Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T03:28:39.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clerical Errors in the Scoring of the WISC-R.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Darko J. Hajzler
Darko J. Hajzler*
Affiliation:
Student Services, Ministry of Education, Victoria
Get access

Abstract

The nature, frequency and effect of clerical errors in the scoring of the WISC-R were examined. The most frequent errors were those associated with addition tasks and in the calculation of the subject's age at the time of assessment. Some errors, whether occurring singly or in a compounding effect, significantly distorted Full Scale IQ.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1987 , pp. 24 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Collier Macmillan Publisher.Google Scholar
Dean, R.S. (1983). Manual: Report of individual evaluation for use with the WISC-R. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley-lnterscience.Google Scholar
Sattler, J.M. (1982). Assessment of children’s intelligence and special abilities. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
Sattler, J.M., Andres, J.R., Squire, L.S., Wisley, R., & Maloy, C.F. (1978). Examiner scoring of ambigious WISC-R responses. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 486–489.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar