No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The relation between kinaesthetic acuity and skilled motor ability for primary aged female athletes and non-athletes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2015
Abstract
The present study examined sensitivity to kinaesthetic information for fifty-one girls aged 9 to 10 years. Girls with competitive sporting experience were divided into a gymnastics group, ball-skills group and a combined (gymnastic and ball-skills) group. A non-athlete control group was also included. Baseline measures of general motor ability were obtained using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Henderson and Sugden, 1992) and measures of sensitivity to kinaesthetic information were obtained using the Kinaesthetic Acuity Test (KAT) [Livesey and Parkes, 1995]. Results revealed a moderate but significant correlation between motor proficiency and kinaesthetic acuity. A stronger finding was the ability of the Kinaesthetic Acuity Test (KAT) to predict the motor performance of girls with high and low kinaesthetic acuity within the sample. High kinaesthetic acuity predicted significantly better motor proficiency and low kinaesthetic acuity predicted significantly poorer motor proficiency. Results further indicated that kinaesthetic acuity did not differ as a function of specific sporting experience.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2005
References
Bairstow, P.J. & Laszlo, J.I. (1981). Kinaesthetic sensitivity to passive movements and its relationship to motor development and motor control. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 606–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, R., Piek, J.P., & Livesey, D.J. (2001) A longitudinal study of motor ability and kinaesthetic acuity in young children at risk of developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 20, 95–100.Google Scholar
Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised. Published by American Guidance Service. Minnesota.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.M., Connolly, K..J. & Doyle, A.J.R, (1988). Development of kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 30, 80–92.Google Scholar
Freeman, M.L. & Broderick, P. (1996). Kinaesthetic sensitivity of adolescent male and female athletes and non-athletes. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Jun:28(2): 46–9.Google Scholar
Henderson, S.E., (1993). Motor development and minor handicap. In Kalverboer, A.F., Hopkins, B./George, R.. Motor Development in early and later childhood: Longitudinal approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 286–306
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S.E. & Sugden, D.A. (1992). Movement assessment battery for children. UK: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hoare, D. & Larkin, D.(1991). Kinaesthetic abilities of clumsy children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 671–678.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Biggerstaff, A., Moran, G., McKinlay, I. (1982). Visual, Kinaesthetic and Cross-modal judgements of length by normal and clumsy children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24, 461–471.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J.I. & Bairstow, P.J. (1983). Kinaesthesis: Its measurements, training and relationship to motor control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 411–421.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J.I. & Bairstow, P.J. (1985). Perceptual Motor Behaviour: Developmental Assessment and Therapy. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J.I. & Bairstow, P.J. (1985b). Test of Kinaesthetic Sensitivity. Senkit Pty Ltd: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Livesey, D.J. & Parkes, N.A. (1995). Testing Kinaesthetic acuity in preschool children. The Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 3, 160–163.Google Scholar
Livesey, D.J., & Intilli, D. (1996). A gender difference in visual-spatial ability in 4-year-old children: Effects on performance of a kinaesthetic acuity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 436–446.Google Scholar
Livesey, D.J. & Kangas, M. (1997). The role of visual movement imagery in kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance. The Australian Education and Developmental Psychologist, 14,1, 3–10.Google Scholar
Livesey, D.J. & Coleman, R. (1998). The development of kinaesthesis and its relationship to motor ability in preschool children. In Piek, Jan P. (Ed), Motor Behaviour and Human Skill: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Livesey, D.J. (2002) Age differences in the relationship between visual movement imagery and performance on kinaesthetic acuity tests. Developmental Psychology, Vol 38, No. 2, 279–287.Google Scholar
Lord, R. & Hulme, C. (1987). Kinaesthetic sensitivity of normal and clumsy children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 29, 720–725.Google Scholar
Pick, J.P. & Coleman, R. (1995). Kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children with Developmental coordination Disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 976–984.Google Scholar
Sims, K. & Morton, J. (1998). Modelling the Training effects of Kinaesthetic Acuity Measurement in Children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 5, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, J., & Geuze, R.H. (2000) Kinaesthetic acuity in adolescent boys: A longitudinal study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 42, 93–96.Google Scholar