Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-08T23:16:08.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children’s Interpretations of Good and Bad Television Characters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

David Goble  and
Ann Knowles
David Goble*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Ann Knowles
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
*
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Caulfield/Peninsula Section, Dandenong Rd, Caulfield Victoria Australia 3162, Telephone: (03) 9903 2475, Fax: (03) 9903 2501, e-mail: David.Goble@sci.monash.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

While there has been much concern over television’s influence on children, few studies have investigated the way young children and adults differ in their ability to distinguish the behaviour of “good” and “bad” television characters. The present study investigated the extent to which preschool children, primary school students, and adults differed in their interpretations of the actions of a stereotypically good and a stereotypically bad character. An edited television drama programme was examined for comprehension and for the extent to which children and adults differed in their belief that the characters in the programme were real. Preschool children were found to evaluate characters similarly to adults, although significant differences were evident in their comprehension of the programme and their judgement of the reality of the television content.

Keywords

CharactersChildrenReality TestingSemantic DifferentialTelevision
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , November 1996 , pp. 54 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: MacMillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, L., & Rogers, K.H. (1986). A priming effect analysis of media influences. In Bryant, J. & Zillman, D. (Eds.), Perceptions on media violence (pp. 57–81). N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Centerwall, B.S. (1993). Television and violent crime. The Public Interest, 3, 56–71.Google Scholar
Collins, W.A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children’s television viewing. In Bryant, J. & Anderson, D.R. (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television (pp. 125–150). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, W.A., Berndt, T.J., & Hess, V.L. (1974). Observational learning of motives and consequences for television aggression: A developmental study. Child Development, 45, 799–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, W.A., & Wellman, H. (1982). Social scripts and developmental patterns in comprehension of televised narratives. Communications Research, 9, 380–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, A. (1983). No shortcuts to judging reality. In Bryant, J. & Anderson, D.R. (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television (pp. 199–220). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dorr, A. (1986). Television and children: A special medium for a special audience. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Eron, L.D. (1986). Interventions to mitigate the psychological effects of media violence on aggressive behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, B. (1988). The importance of studying viewers’ perceptions of television violence. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 7, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, B. (1991). Children’s views about television. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Gunter, B., & Wober, M. (1988). Violence on television: What the viewers think. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.S., & Casey, D.M. (1992). Young children and television: The retention of emotional reactions. Child Development, 63, 1423–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodge, B., & Tripp, D. (1987). Children and television: A semiotic approach. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Knowles, A.D., & Nixon, M.C. (1989). Children’s comprehension of expressive states depicted in a television cartoon. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, A.D., & Nixon, M.C. (1990). Children’s comprehension of a television cartoon’s emotional theme. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, R.M., & Sprafkin, J. (1988). The early window (3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Huston, A.C., & Wright, J.C. (1983). The forms of television: Effects on children’s attention, comprehension and social behavior. In Meyer, M. (Ed.), Children and the formal features of television: Approaches and findings of experimental and formative research (pp. 21–55). Munich: Saur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, B.G., & Ferguson, T.J. (1986). The effects of media violence on attitudes, emotions, and cognitions. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydin, I. (1983). How children understand television and learn from it: A Swedish perspective. In Meyer, M. (Ed.), Children and the formal features of television (pp. 166–187). Munich: Saur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
van der Voort, T.H.A. (1986). Television violence: A child’s eye view. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wober, M. (1986). The lens of television and the prism of personality. In Bryant, J. & Zillman, D. (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 205–231). N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar