Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T04:33:49.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional idiosyncrasies of suggesting constructions in British English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2023

MIN-CHANG SUNG Open the ORCID record for MIN-CHANG SUNG [Opens in a new window]
MIN-CHANG SUNG*
Affiliation:
Department of English Education Gyeongin National University of Education 62, Gyesan-ro Gyeyang-gu, Incheon (21044) South Korea (Republic of Korea) mcsung@ginue.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to examine functional idiosyncrasies of seemingly synonymous constructions and explain their frequency distributions in different spoken registers. To this end, lexical and discoursal approaches in the corpus-based research of constructions are combined to investigate how significant collocates of three suggesting constructions – namely, let's, what/how about and why don't you/we – are contextually situated in British English. Constructional analyses of the spoken part of the British National Corpus show that the three suggesting constructions primarily perform different metadiscourse and directive functions. Based on these functional variations, the present study explains the distribution and usage of the three suggesting constructions across the five spoken registers.

Keywords

British Englishspoken registerssuggesting constructionscollocationdiscourse
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 321 - 344
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2, 119–27.Google Scholar
Dunning, Ted E. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Lee-Goldman, Russell & Rhodes, Russell. 2012. The framenet constructicon. In Boas, Hans C. & Sag, Ivan A. (eds.), Sign-based construction grammar, 283–322. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2015. The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners: A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1), 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1999. The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), The emergence of language, 197–212. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2014. Stance markers. In Aijmer, Karin & Rühlemann, Christoph (eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook, 219–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas, Hampe, Beate & Schönefeld, Doris. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4), 635–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1), 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2019. Construction grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses: The case of the way in which construction. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3), 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian & Evert, Stefan. 1996. BNCweb (CQP-edition). http://bnc-web.lancs.ac.uk (accessed January 2022).Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Yingying & Lu, Xiaofei. 2020. N1 of N2 constructions in academic written discourse: A pattern grammar analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young. 2000. Actually and in fact in American English: A data-based analysis. English Language & Linguistics 4(2), 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent. 2014. Rethinking constructional polysemy: The case of the English conative construction. In Glynn, Dylan & Robinson, Justyna A. (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 61–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent & Patten, Amanda L.. 2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3), 354–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Römer, Ute & Berger, Cynthia M.. 2019. Observing the emergence of constructional knowledge: Verb patterns in German and Spanish learners of English at different proficiency levels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(5), 1089–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, Min-Chang. 2020. Underuse of English verb–particle constructions in an L2 learner corpus: Focus on structural patterns and one-word preference. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(1), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, Min-Chang & Park, Ji-Hyun. 2023. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (online). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Ek, Jan Ate & Alexander, Leonard George. 1980. Threshold level English. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & Miglio, Viola G.. 2016. Constructions with subject vs. object experiencers in Spanish and Italian. In Yoon, Jiyoung & Gries, Stefan Thomas (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to construction grammar, 65–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David A. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo & Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2021. Poisson regression for linguists: A tutorial introduction to modelling count data with brms. Language and Linguistics Compass 15(11), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie, Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2007. Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In Radden, Günter, Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, Berg, Thomas & Siemund, Peter (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 265–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Online dictionaries (accessed January 2022):Google Scholar
Collins Dictionary. www.collinsdictionary.comGoogle Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. www.ldoceonline.comGoogle Scholar
Macmillan Dictionary. www.macmillandictionary.comGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. www.oed.comGoogle Scholar