Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T20:57:37.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To do or not to do: willingness to communicate in the ESL context

Pakistani students are highly willing to communicate in English in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2016

Syeda Farzana Bukhari  and
Xiaoguang Cheng
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

English is used by more than one and a half billion people as a first, second or foreign language for communication purposes (Strevens, 1992). In this context, the purpose of teaching English has shifted from mastery of the grammatical rules to the ability to use the target language for successful communication. Consequently, the communication aspect of teaching and learning English has become the key issue in the domain of second language acquisition (Yashima, 2002: 54). Therefore, the issue of whether the learners will communicate in English when they have the chance to do so and to what extent they are willing to communicate gain importance. These questions have led to the emergence of an important construct in the field of L2 instruction, i.e. willingness to communicate (hereafter, WTC), which is defined as a learner's ‘readiness to enter into discourse at a particular time with a specific person or persons, using a L2’ (MacIntyre et al., 1998: 547). MacIntyre and his associates even proposed that WTC in L2 should be conceptualized as ‘the primary goal’ of language instruction (MacIntyre et al., 1998: 545). This paper explores the important concept of WTC by looking into Pakistani students' WTC in Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 36 - 42
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, D. 2013. ‘Willingness to communicate in English as a second language as a stable trait or context-influenced variable: Case studies of Iranian migrants to New Zealand.’ Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetinkaya, Y. B. 2005. ‘Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kim, S. J. 2004. ‘Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a foreign language) students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. 2001. ‘Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students.’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. 1998. ‘Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation.’ The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mari, M., Pathan, H., & Shahriar, A. 2011. ‘Willingness to communicate in L2: A perception of Pakistani university students.’ ELF Annual Research Journal, 13, 65–82.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J. C. 1992. ‘Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale.’ Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. 1990. ‘Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives.’ Southern Journal of Communication, 56(1), 72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, P. 1992. ‘English as an international language: Directions in the 1990s.’ The Other Tongue: English across Cultures, 2, 27–47.Google Scholar
Xie, Q. M. 2011. ‘Willingness to communicate in English among secondary school students in the rural Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom.’ Unpublished MA thesis. New Zealand: Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
Yashima, T. 2002. ‘Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context.’ The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. 2004. ‘The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication.’ Language Learning, 54(1), 119–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, M. 2010. ‘Chinese students' willingness to communicate in English in Canada.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Ontario: University of Windsor.Google Scholar