Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T21:21:42.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

British Public Policy and Multinationals during the “Dollar Gap” Era, 1945–1960

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Abstract

This article examines the role of British exchange and import controls in stimulating the dramatic increase in overseas (particularly American) multinationals in Britain from the end of the Second World War to the late 1950s, together with the ways in which the government used controls to regulate the foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow. Exchange controls were both an important stimulus to inward investment and a powerful and flexible means of regulating its volume and character. Government was relatively successful in using these powers to maximize the dollar balance and industrial benefits of FDI to Britain, given initially severe dollar and capacity constraints, and in liberalizing policy once these constraints receded and competition from other FDI hosts intensified.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2002. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

American Chamber of Commerce in London. American Participation in British Industry. London, 1945.Google Scholar
Behrman, Jack N. National Interests and Multinational Enterprise: Tensions among North Atlantic Countries. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1970.Google Scholar
Caves, Richard E. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. New York, 1996.Google Scholar
Dow, J. Christopher R. The Management of the British Economy, 1945–60. Cambridge|U.K., 1964.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H. American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry. London, 1958.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H.. The Globalization of Business. London, 1993.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H.. International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. London, 1981.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H.. Multinationals, Technology, and Competitiveness. London, 1988.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H.. The Role of American Investment in the British Economy. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H.. Studies in International Investment. London, 1970.Google Scholar
Hodges, Michael. Multinational Corporations and National Government: A Case Study of the United Kingdom’s Experience, 1964-1970 . Lexington, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael J. The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952 . New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Lall, Sanjaya. Multinationals, Technology and Exports. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S., and Brennan, George. Britain’s Place in the World: A Historical Enquiry into Import Controls, 1945-60. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Moran, Theodore H., ed. United Nations Library on Transnational Corporations, vol. 7: Governments and Transnational Corporations. New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, SidneyG.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
Safarian, A. Edward. Multinational Enterprise and Public Policy. Brookfield, Vt., 1993.Google Scholar
Schenk, Catherine R. Britain and the Sterling Area: From Devaluation to Convertibility in the 1950s. London, 1994.Google Scholar
Steuer, Max D., et al. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the United Kingdom. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Mira. The Maturing of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from 1914 to 1970. Cambridge, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
Bostock, Frances, and Jones, Geoffrey. “Foreign Multinationals in British Manufacturing, 1850-1962” Business History 36 (Jan. 1994): 89126.Google Scholar
Dunning, John H., Cantwell, John A., and Corley, Thomas A. B.. “The Theory of International Production: Some Historical Antecedents.” In Multinationals: Theory and History, ed. Hertner, Peter and Jones, Geoffrey. Brook-field, Vt., 1986, pp. 941.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, David Kenneth. “The Multinational: A Critique of a Concept.” In Multinational Enterprise in Historical Perspective, ed. Teichova, Alice, Levy-Leboyer, Maurice, and Nussbaum, Helga. New York, 1986, pp. 929.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Robert W.The Policies of England, France, and Germanyas Recipients of Foreign Direct Investment.” In International Mobility and Movement of Capital, ed. Machlup, Fritz, Salant, Walter S., and Tarshis, Lorie. New York, 1972, pp. 397431.Google Scholar
Hemming, M. F.W., Miles, C. M., and Ray, G. F.. “A Statistical Summary of the Extent of Import Control in the United Kingdom since the War. Review of Economic Studies 26 (Feb. 1959): 75109.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey. “The British Government and Foreign Multinationals before 1970.” In Governments, Industries and Markets: Aspects of Government-Industry Relations in the U.K., West Germany and the U.S.A. since 1945, ed. Chick, Martin. Brookfield, Vt., 1990, pp. 194214.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey, and Bostock, Frances. “U.S. Multinationals in British Manufacturing before 1962. Business History Review 70 (Summer 1996): 207–56.Google Scholar
Knox, Bill, and McKinlay, Alan. “Working for the Yankee Dollar: American Inward Investment and Scottish Labour, 1945-70. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 7 (1999): 126.Google Scholar
Lynch, Frances M. B.De Gaulle’s First Veto: France, the Rueff Plan and the Free Trade Area. Contemporary European History 9 (March 2000): 111–35.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Rachael. “New Perspectives of Foreign Direct Investment.” In Foreign Direct Investment, ed. Froot, Kenneth A.. Chicago, 1993, pp.3753.Google Scholar
Schenk, Catherine R.Exchange Controls and Multinational Enterprise: The Sterling-Dollar Oil Controversyin the 1950s. Business History 38 (Oct. 1996): 2140.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter, and Rooth, Tim. “Public Policyand Foreign-Based Enterprises in Britain Prior to the Second World War. Historical Journal 42 (June 1999): 495515.Google Scholar
Teece, David J.Firm Organization, Industrial Structure, and Technological Innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 (Nov. 1996): 193224.Google Scholar
Tiratsoo, Nick, and Tomlinson, Jim. “Exporting the ‘Gospel of Productivity’: United States Technical Assistance and British Industry, 1945-1960. Business HistoryReview 71 (Spring 1997): 4181.Google Scholar
Board of Trade Journal. 7 Aug. 1964.Google Scholar
Business Week. 31 Aug. 1946.Google Scholar
Economist. 5 June 1954; 16 May 1959 Google Scholar
Evening Standard. 26 March 1949.Google Scholar
Foreign Commerce Weekly. 17 Jan. 1955.Google Scholar
OEEC. Private United States Investment in Europe and the Overseas Territories. Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. Canada’s International Investment Position: 1926 to 1967. Ottawa, 1971.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Parliament. Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System (Cmnd. 827, Aug.1959) [Radcliffe Report], paras. 964–77.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1949. Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
Australian Archives. Canberra: A4311/1, 29/4.Google Scholar
Board of Trade Papers, 64. Public Record Office, London.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office Papers, 129, 130, and 134. Public Record Office, London.Google Scholar
Exchange Control Department, 5. Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
SEP Class Papers, 4. Scottish Record Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress Papers, 292. Modern Records Centre, Warwick, England.Google Scholar
TreasuryPapers, 231 and 266. Public Record Office, London.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey, et al. Impact of Foreign Multi-National Investment in Britain since 1850 [computer file], ESRC Data Archive. Colchester, U.K., 1993.Google Scholar