Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:11:29.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Cape Industries and Multinational Corporate Liability for a Toxic Hazard, 1950–2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Geoffrey Tweedale  and
Laurie Flynn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘corporate veil’ refers to the separation of legal identity between parent firms and their subsidiaries, which gives the parent protection against the liabilities of its subsidiaries. Fearing that such liability protection would facilitate illicit activity, early twentieth century courts, especially in America, would sometimes ‘pierce’ the corporate veil. This article explores Adams v. Cape (1990), in which American plaintiffs attempted to persuade the English courts to lift the corporate veil and impose liability for industrial disease on Cape Industries, a leading U.K. asbestos manufacturer. This landmark case shows how corporate strategy can be closely intertwined with international corporate law and occupational health and safety issues. It also highlights how limited liability law and separate legal personality can result in significant injustice to claimants against multinational enterprises.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Business and Nature , June 2007 , pp. 268 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Bakan, Joel. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York, 2004.Google Scholar
Bartrip, P. The Way from Dusty Death: Turner and Newall and the Regulation of Occupational Health in the British Asbestos Industry 1890S–1970. London, 2001.Google Scholar
Berk, G. Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917. Baltimore, Md., 1997.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P.I. The Multinational Challenge to Corporate Law: The Search fora New Corporate Personality. New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Brodeur, Paul. Expendable Americans: The Incredible Story of How Tens of Thousands of American Men and Women Die Each Year of Preventable Industrial Disease. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Brodeur, Paul. Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Cape Asbestos Ltd. The Storyofthe Cape Asbestos Company Ltd. London, 1953.Google Scholar
Cape Plc. A Distinguished Past and a Confident Future: A Short History of Cape PLC 1893–1993. London, 1993.Google Scholar
Carroll, S.J. et al., eds. Asbestos Litigation. Santa Monica, Calif., 2005, Posted at: http://www.rand.org.Google Scholar
Castleman, B.I. Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 2005.Google Scholar
Dine, J. The Governance of Corporate Groups. Cambridge, Mass., 2000.Google Scholar
Environmental Working Group. Asbestos: ThinkAgain. Washington, D.C., 2004, Posted at: http://www.ewg.org/reports/asbestos.Google Scholar
Flynn, L. Studded with Diamonds and Paved with Gold: Miners, Mining Communities and Human Rights in South Africa. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Glantz, S. et al., eds. The Cigarette Papers. Berkeley, Calif, 1996.Google Scholar
Grantham, R. and Rickett, C. eds. Corporate Personality in the 20th Century. Oxford, U.K., 1998.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. Ernest Oppenheimerand the Economic Development ofSouth Africa. Cape Town, 1962.Google Scholar
Innes, D. Anglo-American and the Rise ofModern South Africa. London, 1984.Google Scholar
Kessler, D. A Question of Intent: A Great American Battle with a Deadly Industry. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Maines, Rachel. Asbestos and Fire: Technological Trade-offs and the Body at Risk. New Brunswick, N.J., 2005.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. Asbestos Blues: Labour, Capital, Physicians and the State in South Africa. Oxford, U.K., 2002.Google Scholar
Milman, David ed. Regulating Enterprise: Law and Business Organisation in the UK. Oxford, U.K., 1999.Google Scholar
Monopolies Commission. Asbestos and Certain Asbestos Products. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford, U.K., 1995.Google Scholar
New South Wales Government: Cabinet Office. Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into the Medical Research and Compensation Foundation, 2004, Posted at: http://www.cabinet.nsw.gov.au/publications.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. Behind the Corporate Veil: Using Corporate Entities for Illicit Purposes.Paris, 2001, Posted at: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/2101131e.pdf.Google Scholar
Pallister, D. et al. South Africa Inc.: The Oppenheimer Empire. London, 1988.Google Scholar
Pearce, Frank and Tombs, Steve. Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry. Dartmouth, N.H., 1998.Google Scholar
Pringle, P. Dirty Business: Big Tobacco at the Bar of Justice. London, 1998.Google Scholar
Tweedale, G. Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner and Newall and the Asbestos Hazard. Oxford, U.K., 2d ed., 2001.Google Scholar
Wikeley, N.J. Compensation forIndustrialDisease. Aldershot, U.K., 1993.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Anderson, M. “Transnational Corporations and Environmental Damage: Is Tort Law the Answer?” Washburn Law Journal 41 (Spring 2002): 399–425.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. “ape Asbestos, Barking, Health and Environment: 1928–1946.” American Journal Industrial Medicine 43 (Feb. 2003): 109–19.Google Scholar
Heenan, J. “Graceful Maneuvering: Corporate Avoidance of Liability through Bankruptcy and Corporate Law.” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law (2003). Available from http://www.vjel.org/roscoe/roscoe03a.html.Google Scholar
Hills, B. “The James Hardie Story: Asbestos Victims’ Claims Evaded by Manufacturer.” International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 11 (April/June 2005): 212–14.Google Scholar
Katzenellenbogen, S. (updated by Salamie, R.A.). Anglo-American corporation of South Africa Ltd.” In International Directory of CompanyHistories, ed. Grant, T. London, 1997, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Keller, M. “Business History and Legal History.” Business History Review 53 (Autumn 1979): 295–303.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. and Tweedale, G. “Double Standards: The Multinational Asbestos Industry and Asbestos-Related Disease in South Africa.” International Journal of Health Services 34 (4): (2004), 663–79.Google Scholar
Meeran, Richard. “Cape Plc: South African Mineworkers’ Quest for Justice.” International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 9 (Sept. 2003): 218–27.Google Scholar
Meeran, Richard. “Liability of Multinational Corporations: A Critical Stage in the UK.” In Liability ofMultinational Corporations under International Law, eds.Kamminga, Menno and Zia-Zarifi, Sam. The Hague, 2000, pp. 251–64.Google Scholar
Miller, Sandra K. “Piercing the Corporate Veil among Affiliated Companies in the European Community and in the US: A Comparative Analysis of US, German and UK Veil-Piercing Approaches.” American Business Law Journal 36 (Fall 1998): 73–149.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. “Corporations in International Litigation: Problems of Jurisdiction and the United Kingdom Asbestos Cases.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50 (Jan. 2001): 1–25.Google Scholar
Newhouse, M.L. and Thompson, H. “Mesothelioma of Pleura and Peritoneum Following Exposure to Asbestos in the London Area.” British Journal of Industrial Medicine 22 (Oct. 1965): 261–69.Google Scholar
Ozonoff, D. “Failed Warnings: Asbestos-Related Disease and Industrial Medicine.” In The Health and Safety of Workers, ed. Bayer, R. New York, 1988, pp. 139–218.Google Scholar
Rivlin, K. and Potts, J.D. “Not So Fast: The Sealed Air Asbestos Settlement and Methods of Risk Management in the Acquisition of Companies with Asbestos Liabilities.” New York University Environmental Law Journal 11 (3): (2003), 626–61.Google Scholar
Rolle, Mary E. “Unravelling Accountability: Contesting Legal and Procedural Barriers in International Toxic Tort Cases.” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 15 (Winter 2003): 137–201.Google Scholar
Rosen, C.M. and Sellers, C.C. “The Nature of the Firm: Towards an Eco-cultural History ofBusiness.” Business History Review 73 (Winter 1999): 577–600.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. “The Dusting of America: A Story of Asbestos-Carnage, Cover-Up, and Litigation.” Harvard Law Review 99 (May 1986): 1693–1706.Google Scholar
Wormser, I.M. “Piercing the Veil of Corporate Identity.” Columbia Law Review 12 (Dec. 1912): 496–524.Google Scholar

Newspapers and Trade Publications

CAC (Cape Asbestos Companies) Magazine 3 (Summer 1954); CAC Magazine 4 (Spring 1955); CAC Magazine 9 (Spring 1960).Google Scholar
Financial Times. 26 March 2004.Google Scholar
Guardian. 21 Aug. 2000; 18 Nov. 2003.Google Scholar
Management Today. Dec. 1977.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Manchester Metropolitan University Business School.Google Scholar