Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T07:22:31.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy system change and external effects in climate change mitigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2007

DENNIS ANDERSON
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
SARAH WINNE
Affiliation:
Imperial College London

Abstract

Through a dynamic model of energy system change the paper examines the role of innovation in bringing about a low carbon energy system. The processes of innovation and technological substitution are cumulative, dynamic, and highly non-linear processes such that how the energy system evolves in the long term is extraordinarily sensitive to the strength and duration of the initial policies. It is possible, under some policy assumptions, that energy systems would continue to depend on fossil fuels for so long as fossil fuels remain abundant and the least cost resource; and under other assumptions, after allowing for the unavoidable lags associated with investment and the building up of a new capital stock, that fossil fuels would become almost wholly displaced by the non-carbon alternatives. The implication is that the external benefits of innovation, which include the creation of options and the reduction of costs arising directly from innovation itself, and the reduction of environmental damage, are far greater, perhaps by orders of magnitude, than the traditional cost–benefit models used for the analysis of climate change mitigation. The analysis suggests why a focus on discovery and innovation offers a promising way forward for national and international policies on climate change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research for this paper was made possible by grants from the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change, for which our thanks. It is a product of a joint macro-economic modelling project undertaken in partnership with our colleagues, Terry Barker, Jonathan Koehler and Haoran Pan of Cambridge University, Rachel Warren of The University of East Anglia, and Paul Ekins of the Policy Studies Institute London. Our colleague at Imperial College Tim Foxon also worked on this project and offered many helpful comments as the research proceeded. Two anonymous referees also provided constructive comments, for which our thanks.