Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T00:06:38.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remove or redistribute: re-examining the pollution haven hypothesis from ambient regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Rong Ma  and
Xiaojun Shi Open the ORCID record for Xiaojun Shi [Opens in a new window]
Rong Ma
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, P. R. China
Xiaojun Shi*
Affiliation:
China Financial Policy Research Center School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, P. R. China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: sxjstein@126.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper re-examines the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) by taking environmental regulation in ambient regions as a critical determinant concurrent with own regulation. Exploiting the Two Control Zones policy in China as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that both the curbing effect of the local environmental regulation and the spillover effect of ambient regions affect high-polluting foreign direct investment (FDI) location. Moreover, reallocated FDI results in redistributing instead of reducing pollutant emissions. Our evidence enriched by spatial spillover primarily supports the PHH in the context of China. It suggests a national-wide coordinated environmental policy with a unified goal performs better than separately implementing stringent regulations in highly polluted areas.

Keywords

foreign direct investmentenvironmental regulationspillover effectpollution haven hypothesis

JEL classification

R11: Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes F21: International Investment • Long-Term Capital Movements Q53: Air Pollution • Water Pollution • Noise • Hazardous Waste • Solid Waste • Recycling
Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 47 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, L, Van Biesebroeck, J and Zhang, Y (2012) Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics 97, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunel, C and Levinson, A (2016) Measuring the stringency of environmental regulations. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, X, Lu, Y, Wu, M and Yu, L (2016) Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics 123, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, G, Weng, X, Xu, M and Zhou, L-A (2021) Minimum performance target, multitasking, and incentives: theory and evidence from China's air quality controls. Working Paper. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4083512.Google Scholar
Cole, MA and Elliott, RJR (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics 9, 530–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, MA, Elliott, RJR and Shimamoto, K (2005) Why the grass is not always greener: the competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization. Ecological Economics 54, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, BR (2008) The pollution haven hypothesis. In Gallagher KP (ed), Handbook on Trade and the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, chapter 4..Google Scholar
Frankel, JA and Rose, AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksson, PG and Millimet, DL (2002) Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across US states. Journal of Urban Economics 1, 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R (2010) US environmental regulation and FDI: evidence from a panel of US-based multinational firms. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, 158–189.Google Scholar
Hering, L and Poncet, S (2014) Environmental policy and exports: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68, 296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, AB, Peterson, SR, Portney, PR and Stavins, RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?. Journal of Economic Literature 33, 132–163.Google Scholar
Jug, J and Mirza, D (2005) Environmental regulations in gravity equations: evidence from Europe. World Economy 28, 1591–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W and Levinson, A (2002) Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states. Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kheder, SB and Zugravu, N (2012) Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: an economic geography model in an international comparative study. Ecological Economics 77, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konisky, DM (2007) Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: is there a race to the bottom?. American Journal of Political Science 51, 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, A and Taylor, MS (2008) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review 49, 223–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, JA and Co, CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, DL and Roy, J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31, 652–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raspiller, S and Riedinger, N (2008) Do environmental regulations influence the location behavior of French firms?. Land Economics 84, 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, S (2015) Environmental regulations on air pollution in China and their impact on infant mortality. Journal of Health Economics 42, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, UJ and Timmins, CD (2009) Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics 43, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, D (2001) Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries. Journal of Environment and Development 10, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L, Lin, Y, Wang, J and Peng, F (2021) Pollution monitoring, strategic behavior, and dynamic representativeness. Working Paper. Available at https://linyang-econ.com/Manuscript_Yang%20et%20al.pdf.Google Scholar
Zhang, B, Chen, X and Guo, H (2018) Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement?. Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Journal of Public Economics 164, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y (2007) De Facto Federalism in China: Reforms and Dynamics of Central-Local Relations. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ma and Shi supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Ma and Shi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 198 KB