Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:35:28.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘If labels for GM food were present, would consumers trust them?’ Insights from a consumer survey in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2013

Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe ,
José Falck-Zepeda  and
Justus Wesseler
Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe
Affiliation:
Georg-August-University Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5, 37073 Goettingen, Germany. E-mail: ekikulw@gwdg.de; emkikulwe@gmail.com
José Falck-Zepeda
Affiliation:
Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, USA. E-mail: j.falck-zepeda@cgiar.org
Justus Wesseler
Affiliation:
Technische Universitaet München, Agricultural and Food Economics, Germany. E-mail: justus.wesseler@wzw.tum.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Food labelling is costly. Food labelling is often demanded with the introduction of new food products such as genetically modified (GM) food. If consumers do not have trust in the label, scarce resources are wasted. This paper investigates factors affecting the trust in food labels among Ugandan consumers. The results suggest that older, less-educated individuals of smaller household sizes and with trust in government institutions have more trust in food labels. Other factors were also found to be important. The government has to consider those differences in consumer trust when designing a GM labelling policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 786 - 805
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2002), ‘Who trusts others?’, Journal of Public Economics 85: 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., Valenzuela, E., and Jackson, L.A. (2008), ‘Recent and prospective adoption of genetically modified cotton: a global computable general equilibrium analysis of economic impacts’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 56(2): 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahry, D., Kosolapov, M., Kozyreva, P., and Wilson, R.K. (2005), ‘Ethnicity and trust: evidence from Russia’, American Political Science Review 99(3): 521–532.Google Scholar
Bellemare, C. and Kröger, S. (2007), ‘On representative social capital’, European Economic Review 51: 183–202.Google Scholar
Botha, G.M. and Viljoen, C.D. (2009), ‘South Africa: a case study for voluntary GM labelling’, Food Chemistry 112(3): 1060–1064.Google Scholar
Bouët, A. and Gruère, G.P. (2011), ‘Refining opportunity cost estimates of not adopting GM cotton: an application in seven Sub-Saharan African countries’, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 33(2): 260–279.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2012), ‘The income and production effects of biotech crops globally 1996–2010’, GM Crops and Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain 3(4): 265–272.Google Scholar
Cox, J. (2004), ‘How to identify trust and reciprocity’, Games and Economic Behavior 46: 260–281.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2006), Risk Issues: Executive Summary On Food Safety, Special Eurobarometer 238/Wave 64.1 – TNS Opinion and Social, Brussels: European Commission, [Available at] http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/risk_issues_executive_summary_on_food_safety.pdf.Google Scholar
Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., and Shepherd, R. (1999), ‘Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source of characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness’, Public Understanding of Science 8(1): 35–50.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., and Soutter, C.L. (2000), ‘Measuring trust’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 811–846.Google Scholar
Gruère, G.P. and Rao, S.R. (2007), ‘A review of international labelling policies of genetically modified food to evaluate India's proposed rule’, AgBioForum 10(1): 51–64.Google Scholar
Gruère, G.P., Carter, C.A., and Farzin, Y.H. (2009), ‘Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labelling policies’, Review of International Economics 17(3): 393–408.Google Scholar
Holgado, B., Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A., De Irala-Estevez, J., Gibney, M., Kearney, J., and Martinez, J.A. (2000), ‘Sources of information about diet and health in a Mediterranean country – comparison with other European member states’, European Journal of Public Health 10(3): 185–191.Google Scholar
Horna, D., Smale, M., and Falck-Zepeda, J. (2007), ‘Assessing the potential economic impact of genetically modified crops in Ghana’, [Available at] http://programs.ifpri.org/pbs/pbspubs.Google Scholar
Huffman, W.E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J.F., and Tegene, A. (2004), ‘Who do consumers trust for information: the case of genetically modified foods?’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 1222–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M., and Martinsson, P. (in press), ‘Trust, trust games and stated trust: evidence from rural Bangladesh’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization; doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.022.Google Scholar
Karlan, D. (2005), ‘Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions’, American Economic Review 95: 1688–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikulwe, E., Wesseler, J., and Falck-Zepeda, J. (2008), ‘Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions’, Discussion Paper No. 767, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kikulwe, E.M., Birol, E., Wesseler, J., and Falck-Zepeda, J. (2011a), ‘A latent class approach to investigating demand for genetically modified banana in Uganda’, Agricultural Economics 42(5): 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikulwe, E.M., Wesseler, J., and Falck-Zepeda, J. (2011b), ‘Attitudes, perceptions, and trust: insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda’, Appetite 57(5): 401–413.Google Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997), ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(3): 1251–1288.Google Scholar
Lobb, A., Mazzocchi, M., and Triaill, W. (2007), ‘Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information with the theory of planned behaviour’, Food Quality and Preference 18: 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J.S. (1997), Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables: Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, No. 7, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
McLean-Meyinsse, P.E. (2001), ‘An analysis of nutritional label use in the southern United States’, Journal of Food Distribution Research 32(1): 110–114.Google Scholar
Moola, S. and Munnik, V. (2007), ‘GMOs in Africa: food and agriculture’, Status Report 2007, Biosafety, Biopiracy and Biopolitics, Series 4, African Centre for Biosafety, Durban, [Available at] http://stopogm.net/sites/stopogm.net/files/GMOAfrica.pdf.Google Scholar
Mosley, P. and Verschoor, A. (2005), ‘The development of trust and social capital in rural Uganda: an experimental approach’, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, ISSN 1749-8368.Google Scholar
Nayga, R.M. Jr. (1996), ‘Determinants of consumers’ use of nutritional information on food packages’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28(2): 303–312.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, R. (2008), Starved for Science: How Biotechnology is Being Kept Out of Africa, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.W.B and McNeill, H. (2000), ‘A survey of national labelling policies for GM foods’, AgBioForum 3(3): 219–224.Google Scholar
Roosen, J., Lusk, J.L., and Fox, J.A. (2003), ‘Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labelling strategies in France, Germany and the UK’, Agribusiness 19(1): 77–90.Google Scholar
Schechter, L. (2007), ‘Traditional trust measurement and risk of cofound: an experiment in rural Paraguay’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 62: 72–92.Google Scholar
Venus, T. and Wesseler, J. (2012), ‘Bereits doppelt so viel “ohne Gentechni” – Milch als Biomilch in Deutschland: Welche Bedeutung hat GVO – freie Milch für unsere Milchwirtschaft?’, Deutsche Molkerei Zeitung 133(2): 24–26.Google Scholar
Wandel, M. (1997), ‘Food labelling from a consumer perspective’, British Food Journal 99(6): 212–220.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.K. and Eckel, C.E. (2011), ‘Trust and social exchange’, in Drunckman, J.N., Green, D.P., Kuklinski, J.H., and Lupia, A. (eds), The Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerfu, D., Zikhali, P., and Kabenga, I. (2009), ‘Does ethnicity matter for trust? Evidence from Africa’, Journal of African Economies 18(1): 153–175.Google Scholar