Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T08:55:53.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustainable economic development: on the coexistence of resource-dependent and resource-impacting industries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2010

RAMÓN LÓPEZ
RAMÓN LÓPEZ*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland at College Park, 2200 Symons Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Email: rlopez@arec.umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the interactions between harvesters, whose income depends on a renewable natural resource as a key factor of production (e.g., fisheries) and industries that can have important impacts on the renewable resource, but whose production does not depend on it (e.g., off-shore oil extraction) in the context of a growing economy. We examine these issues for a closed economy focusing on how the co-existence between these two sectors affects sustainable development and the well-being of the poor, i.e., the harvesters. We show that under certain conditions the existence and expansion of a resource-impacting industrial sector may be consistent with sustainable development. However, if these conditions are not met, growth of the resource-impacting sector leads to further resource depletion and may even threaten the feasibility of sustainable development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 6: 15 YEARS OF EDE – ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES IN ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS , December 2010 , pp. 687 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baland, J.M. and Platteau, J.P. (1997), ‘Wage inequality and efficiency in the Commons, part I: the unregulated case’, Oxford Economic Papers 49 (3): 451–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baland, J.M. and Platteau, J.P. (1998), ‘Wage inequality and efficiency in the Commons, part II: the regulated case’, Oxford Economic Papers 50 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J. and Taylor, S. (1997), ‘International trade and open-access renewable resources: the small open economy case’, Canadian Journal of Economics 30: 526–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J. and Taylor, S. (1998), ‘The simple economics of Easter Island: a Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use’, American Economic Review 88 (1): 119–138.Google Scholar
Brooke, J. (1994), ‘Texaco shares the blame for Amazon's pollution’, The Houston Chronicle, 22 March 1994, Section A, p. 10.Google Scholar
Chelala, C. (1998), ‘Colombian U'wa face hazards of oil drilling’, The Lancet 352 (9123): 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1990), Mathematical Economics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. and Taylor, S. (2009), ‘Trade, tragedy, and the Commons’, American Economic Review 99: 725–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. (2005), ‘Sustainable economic development in the world of today's poor’, in Simpson, R., Toman, M., and Ayres, R. (eds), Scarcity and Growth Revisited, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 267–279.Google Scholar
Engel, S. and López, R. (2008), ‘Exploiting common resources with capital-intensive technologies: the role of external forces’, Environment and Development Economics 13 (5): 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H.S. (1954), ‘The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery’, Journal of Political Economy 62: 124–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinji, N. (2006), ‘International trade and terrestrial open-access renewable resources in a small open economy’, Canadian Journal of Economics 39: 790–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, J. (1996), Savages, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
López, R. (1997), ‘Environmental externalities in traditional agriculture and the impact of trade liberalization’, Journal of Development Economics 53 (1): 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, R. (1998), ‘The tragedy of the Commons in Cote d'Ivoire agriculture: empirical evidence and implications for evaluating trade policy’, The World Bank Economic Review 12 (1): 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, M., Burris, P., and Bingcang, J.F. (2003), Mining and Critical Ecosystems: Mapping the Risks, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Moffat, D. and Linden, O. (1995), ‘Perception and reality: assessing priorities for sustainable development in the Nigeria River Delta’, Ambio 24 (7–8): 527–538.Google Scholar
Nwilo, P.C. and Badejo, O.T. (2006), ‘Impacts and management of oil spill pollution along the Nigerian coastal areas’, in Sutherland, M. and Nichols, S. (eds), Administering Marine Spaces: International Issues, Fredriksberg, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors, pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and James, W. (1994), Rules, Games, and Common Pool Resources, Ann Harbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, M. (1957), ‘Some considerations of population dynamics and economics in relation to the management of marine fisheries’, Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 14: 669–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R., Toman, M., and Ayres, R. (2005), Scarcity and Growth Revisited, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Smulders, S., Van Soest, D., and Withagen, C. (2004), ‘International trade, species diversity, and habitat conservation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48: 891–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumulty, K. and Eilperin, J. (2010), ‘A major test for President Obama: contain the oil spill and the fallout’, Washington Post, 15 May 2010, A1.Google Scholar