Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:21:37.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CINMa Index: Assessing the potential impact of GM crop management across a heterogeneous landscape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2011

Marcus J. Collier  and
Ewen Mullins

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While significant progress has been made on the modification of crops for the benefit of producers, the same cannot be said in regards to eliciting the potential impact that these crops may have on the wider landscape and the diversity of life therein. Management impacts can create difficulties when making policy, regulation and licensing decisions in those countries where agriculture has a significant social and ecological position in the landscape. To begin to gauge the potential impacts of the management of a selection of GM crops on an agricultural landscape, four key biodiversity stressors (Chemicals, Introgression, Nutrients and Management: CINMa) were identified and a grading system developed using published data. Upon application to five selected GM crops in a case study area, CINMa identifies areas in the wider landscape where biodiversity is likely to be negatively or positively impacted, as well as agricultural zones which may benefit from the land use change associated with the management of GM crops and their associated post market environmental monitoring.

Keywords

biodiversityCINMaGM cropslandscape impactoilseed rapepotato
Type
Opinion paper
Information
Environmental Biosafety Research , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 135 - 145
Copyright
© ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2011

References

Aherne, J, Kelly-Quinn, M, Farrell, EP (2002) A survey of lakes in the Republic of Ireland: hydrochemical characteristics and acid sensitivity. Ambio 31: 452–459 Google ScholarPubMed
Ammann, K (2005) Effects of biotechnology on biodiversity: herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant GM crops. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 388–394 Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, T-H (2003) Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 285–293 Google Scholar
Aviron, S, Sanvido, O, Herzog, F, Baudry, J, Romeis, J, Bigler, F (2006) Monitoring effects of GM crops on butterflies: the use of multiscale approaches for general surveillance. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 1: 85–88 Google Scholar
Barton, JE, Dracup, M (2000) Genetically modified crops and the environment. Agron. J. 92: 797–803 Google Scholar
Bartsch, D, Bigler, F, Castanera, P, Gathmann, A, Gielkens, M, Hartley, S, Lheureux, K, Renckens, S, Schiemann, J, Sweet, J, Wilhelm, R (2006) Concepts for general surveillance of genetically modified (GM) plants: the EFSA position. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 1: 15–20 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Harker, KN, Hall, LM, Warwick, SI, Legere, A, Sikkema, PH, Clayton, GW, Thomas, AG, Leeson, JY, Seguin-Swartz, G, Simard, MJ (2006) A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86: 1243–1264 Google Scholar
Breckling, B, Reuter, H, Middelhoff, U, Glemnitz, M, Wurbs, A, Schmidt, G, Schröder, W, Windhorst, W (2011) Risk indication of genetically modified organisms (GMO): modelling environmental exposure and dispersal across different scales: oilseed rape in Northern Germany as an integrated case study. Ecological Indicators 11: 936–941 Google Scholar
Brussaard, L, de Ruiter, PC, Brown, GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 121: 233–244 Google Scholar
Büchs W (2007) Impact of on-farm landscape structures and farming systems on predators. In David VA, ed, Biocontrol of Oilseed Rape Pests, pp 245–278
Byrne, M, Stone, L (2011) The need for “duty of care” when introducing new crops for sustainable agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3: 50–54 Google Scholar
Cerdeira, AL, Duke, SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. J. Environ. Qual. 35: 1633–1658 Google ScholarPubMed
Champion, GT, May, MJ, Bennett, S, Brooks, DR, Clark, SJ, Daniels, RE, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Hawes, C, Heard, MS, Perry, JN, Randle, Z, Rossall, MJ, Rothery, P, Skellern, MP, Scott, RJ, Squire, GR, Thomas, MR (2003) Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 358: 1801–1818 Google ScholarPubMed
Chandler, S, Dunwell, JM (2008) Gene flow, risk assessment and the environmental release of transgenic plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27: 25–49 Google Scholar
Cockburn, A (2002) Assuring the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods: the importance of an holistic, integrative approach. J. Biotechnol. 98: 79–106 Google ScholarPubMed
Conner, AJ, Glare, TR, Nap, JP (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J. 33: 19–46 Google ScholarPubMed
Connolly L, Kinsella A, Quinlan G, Moran B (2009) National Farm Survey 2008. Teagasc, Athenry, p 108
Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p 25
Dale, VH, Polasky, S (2007) Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 64: 286–296 Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Food (2007) Pesticide Usage Survey: arable crops 2004 – Report No. 2. Stationary Office, Dublin, p 56
Devos, Y, Cougnon, M, Vergucht, S, Bulcke, R, Haesaert, G, Steurbaut, W, Reheul, D (2008) Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize. Transgenic Res. 17: 1059–1077 Google ScholarPubMed
Devos, Y, De Schrijver, A,Reheul, D (2009) Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives. Environ. Monit. Assess. 149: 303–322 Google ScholarPubMed
Dewar, AM, May, MJ, Woiwod, IP, Haylock, LA, Champion, GT, Garner, BH, Sands, RJN, Qi, A, Pidgeon, JD (2003) A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 335–340 Google Scholar
Dunfield, KE, Germida, JJ (2004) Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities. J. Environ. Qual. 33: 806–815 Google ScholarPubMed
EC (European Commission) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327: 1–72
EC (European Commission) (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities: L 106/101
EEC (European Economic Community) (1991) Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. European Economic Communities, Luxembourg
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority – GMO Panel) (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 8: 1879
Ellstrand, NC, Whitkus, R, Rieseberg, LH (1996) Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 5090–5093 Google ScholarPubMed
Ellstrand, NC, Prentice, HC, Hancock, JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539–563 Google Scholar
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2006) Environment in Focus 2006: Environment indicators for Ireland. Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford, p 116
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation of the UN) (2002) Soil Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture: paper prepared as a background paper for the Ninth Regular Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA) FAO-Rome, 14–18 October 2002, Food and Agricultural Organisation of the UN, Rome, p 21
Firbank, LG (2003) The Farm Scale Evaluations of spring-sown genetically modified crops – Introduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 358: 1777–1778 Google Scholar
Flannery, ML, Mead, C, Mullins, E (2005) Employing a composite gene-flow index to numerically quantify a crop’s potential for gene flow: an Irish perspective. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 29–43 Google Scholar
Forman, RTT, Baudry, J (1984) Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology. Environ. Manage. 8: 495–510 Google Scholar
Forristal D (2008) Reduced fuel costs for tillage farmers. In Proceedings of the National Tillage Conference, 2008, Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland, pp 32–46
Good, AG, Johnson, SJ, De Pauw, M,Carroll, RT, Savidov, N, Vidmar, J, Lu, Z, Taylor, G, Stroeher, V (2007) Engineering nitrogen use efficiency with alanine aminotransferase. Can. J. Bot. 85: 252–262 Google Scholar
Haas, G, Wetterich, F, Geier, U (2000) Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 5: 345–348 Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R (2009) Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 26 (Supplement 1): S178–S186 Google Scholar
Håkansson, I, Voorhees, WB, Riley, H (1988) Vehicle and wheel factors influencing soil compaction and crop response in different traffic regimes. Soil Tillage Res. 11: 239–282 Google Scholar
Heard, MS, Hawes, C, Champion, GT, Clark, SJ, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Parish, AM, Perry, JN, Rothery, P, Scott, RJ (2003) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 358: 1819–1832 Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, J, Greef, JM (2003) Mosaic indicators – theoretical approach for the development of indicators for species diversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 387–394 Google Scholar
Holland, JM (2004) The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 103: 1–25 Google Scholar
Kelly F, Champ T, McDonnell N, Kelly-Quinn M, Harrison S, Arbuthnott A, Giller P, Joy M, McCarthy K, Cullen P, Harrod C, Jordan P, Griffiths D, Rosell R (2007) Investigation of the Relationship between Fish Stocks, Ecological Quality Ratings (Q-Values), Environmental Factors and Degree of Eutrophication (2000-MS-4-M1). Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford, p 134
Krogh, PH, Griffiths, B (2007) ECOGEN-Soil ecological and economic evaluation of genetically modified crops. Pedobiologia 51: 171–173 Google Scholar
Kuhlman, T, Reinhard, S, Gaaff, A (2010) Estimating the costs and benefits of soil conservation in Europe. Land Use Policy 27: 22–32 Google Scholar
Laggoun-Défarge, F, Mitchell, E, Gilbert, D, Disnar, J-R, Comont, L, Warner, BG, Buttler, A (2008) Cut-over peatland regeneration assessment using organic matter and microbial indicators (bacteria and testate amoebae). J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 716–727 Google Scholar
Lalor STJ, Coulter BS, Quinlan G, Connolly L (2010) A Survey of Fertilizer use in Ireland from 2004–2008 for Grassland and Arable Crops (RMIS 5943 End of Project Report). Teagasc, Wexford, p 100
Le Cœur, D, Baudry, J, Burel, F, Thenail, C (2002) Why and how we should study field boundary biodiversity in an agrarian landscape context. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: 23–40 Google Scholar
Locke, MA, Zablotowicz, RM, Reddy, KN (2008) Integrating soil conservation practices and glyphosate-resistant crops: impacts on soil. Pest Manage. Sci. 64: 457–469 Google Scholar
Lutman, PJW, Freeman, SE, Pekrun, C (2004) The long-term persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in arable fields. J. Agric. Sci. 141: 231–240 Google Scholar
Mette R, Uckert G, Sattelmacher B (2001) A holistic approach towards sustainable land use management in the hedgerow-field crop interface. In Horst WJ, Schenk MK, Bürkert A, Claassen N, Flessa H, Frommer WB, Goldbach H, Olfs H-W, Römheld V, Sattelmacher B, Schmidhalter U, Schubert S, Wirén Nv, Wittenmayer L, eds, Plant Nutrition – food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems, Kluwer, pp 1026–1027
O’Brien, M, Mullins, (2009) Relevance of genetically modified crops in light of future environmental and legislative challenges to the agri-environment. Ann. Appl. Biol. 254: 323–340 Google Scholar
O’Brien, M, Spillane, C, Meade, C, Mullins, E (2008) An insight into the impact of arable farming on Irish biodiversity: a scarcity of studies hinders a rigorous assessment. Biology & Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 108 (B): 97–108 Google Scholar
Owen, MDK, Zelaya, IA (2005) Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manage. Sci. 61: 301–311 Google ScholarPubMed
Petit, S, Stuart, RC, Gillespie, MK, Barr, CJ (2003) Field boundaries in Great Britain: stock and change between 1984, 1990 and 1998. J. Environ. Manage. 67: 229–238 Google ScholarPubMed
Petti, C, Meade, C, Downes, M, Mullins, E (2007) Facilitating co-existence by tracking gene dispersal in conventional potato systems with microsatellite markers. Environ. Biosafety Res. 6: 223–235 Google ScholarPubMed
Powell, JR, Levy-Booth, DJ, Gulden, RH, Asbil, WL, Campbell, RG, Dunfield, KE, Hamill, AS, Hart, MM, Lerat, S, Nurse, RE, Pauls, KP, Sikkema, PH, Swanton, CJ, Trevors, JT, Klironomos, JN (2009) Effects of genetically modified, herbicide-tolerant crops and their management on soil food web properties and crop litter decomposition. J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 388–396 Google Scholar
Raybould, A (2006) Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5: 119–125 Google ScholarPubMed
Reuter, H, Schmidt, G, Schröder, W, Middelhoff, U, Pehlke, H, Breckling, B (2011) Regional distribution of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – up-scaling the dispersal and persistence potential of herbicide resistant oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Ecological Indicators 11: 989–999 Google Scholar
Sanvido, O, Widmer, F, Winzeler, M, Bigler, F (2005) A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 13–27 Google ScholarPubMed
Sanvido O, Romeis J, Bigler F (2007) Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation. In Fiechter A, Sautter C, eds, Green Gene Technology, Springer, Berlin, pp 235–278
Schiemann, J (2003) Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2: 213–217 Google ScholarPubMed
Schloter, M, Dilly, O, Munch, JC (2003) Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 255–262 Google Scholar
Smil, V (1999) Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13: 647–662 Google Scholar
Smil, V (2000) Phosphorous in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 25: 53–88 Google Scholar
Snow, AA (2002) Transgenic crops – why gene flow matters. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 542 Google ScholarPubMed
Snow, AA, Pilson, D, Rieseberg, LH, Paulsen, MJ, Pleskac, N, Reagon, MR, Wolf, DE, Selbo, SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol. Appl. 13: 279–286 Google Scholar
Stewart, CN Jr, Halfhill, MD, Warwick, SI, (2003) Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nature 4: 806–817 Google ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, WJ, Bailey, MJ, Bainbridge, IP, Brereton, T, Dick, JTA, Drewitt, J, Dulvy, NK, Dusic, NR, Freckleton, RP, Gaston, KJ, Gilder, PM, Green, RE, Heathwaite, AL, Johnson, SM, Macdonald, DW, Mitchell, R, Osborn, D, Owen, RP, Pretty, J, Prior, SV, Prosser, H, Pullin, AS, Rose, P, Stott, A, Tew, T, Thomas, CD, Thompson, DBA, Vickery, JA, Walker, M, Walmsley, C, Warrington, S, Watkinson, AR, Williams, RJ, Woodroffe, R, Woodroof, HJ (2008) Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 821–833 Google Scholar
Sutherland, WJ, Clout, M, Côté, IM, Daszak, P, Depledge, MH, Fellman, L, Fleishman, E, Garthwaite, R, Gibbons, DW, De Lurio, J,Impey, AJ, Lickorish, F, Lindenmayer, D, Madgwick, J, Margerison, C, Maynard, T, Peck, LS, Pretty, J, Prior, S, Redford, KH, Scharlemann, JPW, Spalding, M, Watkinson, AR (2010) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 1–7 Google ScholarPubMed
Swift, MJ, Andren, O, Brussaard, L, Briones, M, Couteaux, M-M, Ekschmitt, K, Kjoller, A, Loiseau, P, Smith, P (1998) Global change, soil biodiversity, and nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: three case studies. Glob. Chang. Biol. 4: 729–743 Google Scholar
Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (1983) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, p 538
Teagasc (2004) Farm Management Data Handbook. Teagasc, Carlow
Thompson, CJ, Thompson, BJP, Ades, PK, Cousens, R, Garnier-Gere, P, Landman, K, Newbigin, E, Burgman, MA (2003) Model-based analysis of the likelihood of gene introgression from genetically modified crops into wild relatives. Ecol. Modell. 162: 199–209 Google Scholar
Thorne FS, Hanarahan K, Mullins E (2008) The Economic Evaluation of a GM Free Country: an Irish Case Study: RERC Working Paper 05-WP-RE-08, The Rural Economy Research Centre Working Paper Series, Teagasc, Carlow, p 37
Tilman, D, Fargione, J, Wolff, B, D’Antonio, C, Dobson, A, Howarth, R, Schindler, D, Schlesinger, WH, Simberloff, D, Swackhamer, D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292: 281–284 Google ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D, Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R, Polasky, S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671–677 Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, R (2004) The field-scale evaluation of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified crops conducted in the UK (1998–2003). J. Commercial Biotechnology 10: 224–233 Google Scholar
Viaud, V, Merot, P, Baudry, J (2004) Hydrochemical buffer assessment in agricultural landscapes: from local to catchment scale. Environ. Manage. 34: 559–573 Google ScholarPubMed
Warwick, SI, Légère, A, Simard, M-J, James, T (2008) Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1387–1395 Google Scholar
Weekes, R, Allnutt, T, Boffey, C, Morgan, S, Bilton, M, Daniels, R, Henry, C (2007) A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK. Transgenic Res. 16: 203–211 Google Scholar
Wilhelm, R, Sanvido, O, Castanera, P, Schmidt, K, Schiemann, J (2009) Monitoring the commercial cultivation of Bt maize in Europe – conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring practice. Environ. Biosafety Res. 8: 219–225 Google ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, MJ, Tepfer, M (2009) Fitness and beyond: preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ. Biosafety Res. 8: 1–14 Google ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, MJ, Elliott, LJ, Allainguillaume, J, Shaw, MW, Norris, C, Welters, R, Alexander, M, Sweet, J, Mason, DC (2003) Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom. Science 302: 457–459 Google Scholar