Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T11:08:23.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental Impact of Nuclear Warfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Arthur H. Westing
Affiliation:
Professor of Ecology and Dean, School of Natural Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, USA; formerlySenior Research Fellow of SIPRI.

Extract

Uncertainty may exist about the future likelihood of nuclear war. On the other hand, no doubt exists that nuclear weapons must be eliminated from the arsenals of the world. Even the most modest and restrained nuclear initiative by one belligerent could well be countered in kind, this in turn perhaps leading to an escalating exchange. Even the very limited attacks by the USA during World War II had a profound impact on the enmeshed humans and their artefacts, the medical and social ramifications of which continue to haunt the survivors and their offspring. However, the present paper does not dwell on the effects of nuclear weapons on humans*, but rather upon the natural environment. It summarizes the foreseeable environmental impact in quantitative terms with respect to damage from the blast-wave, the thermal pulse, and the nuclear radiation—doing so, by way of example, for a 20-kiloton atomic bomb and a 1-megaton hydrogen bomb (and also with passing mention for a 1-kiloton neutron bomb).

The effects of a nuclear war—a war in which scores to hundreds, if not thousands, of nuclear bombs might be expended—is summarized in relation to affected portions of the geosphere, the atmosphere, and the Biosphere. A nuclear attack would kill wildlife and destroy the vegetation over a large area through a combination of blast, heat, and nuclear radiation. Wildfires could well extend the zone of immediate destruction. Surface disruption and the loss of vegetation would lead to greatly accelerated wind and water erosion and ‘nutrient dumping’.

It is concluded nevertheless that an area devastated by nuclear warfare would in time recover by the natural processes of ecological succession, but far more slowly and more unpredictably than following other forms of ecological disruption.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bensen, D. W. & Sparrow, A. H. (Eds) (1971). Survival of Food Crops and Livestock in the Event of Nuclear War. US Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC, USA: Symposium Series No. 24, xi + 745 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Committee for the Compilation of Materials on Damage Caused by the Atomic Bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1981). Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Physical, Medical, and Social Effects of the Atomic Bombings (translated from the Japanese by Ishikawa, E. & Swain, D. L.). Basic Books, New York, NY, USA: xlv + 706 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Glasstone, S. & Dolan, P. J. (1977). Effects of Nuclear Weapons (3rd edn). US Departments of Defense & Energy, Washington, DC, USA: 653 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. (1979). Economic and Social Consequences of Nuclear Attacks on the United States. US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Washington, DC, USA: xi + 150 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nier, A. O. C., Friend, J. P., Hempelmann, L. H., McCormick, J. F., Parker, D. R., Reiter, E. R., Seymour, A. H. & Waggoner, P. E. (Eds) (1975). Long-term Worldwide Effects of Multiple Nuclear-weapons Detonations. US National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA: 213 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Okada, S., Hamilton, H. B., Egami, N., Okajima, S., Russell, W. J. & Takeshita, K. (Eds) (1975). Review of thirty years' study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. Journal of Radiation Research (Chiba), 16 (suppl.), pp. 1164.Google Scholar
Rotblat, J. (1981). Nuclear Radiation in Warfare. Taylor & Francis, London, England, UK: xvii + 149 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sharfman, P., Johns, L. S., Medalia, J., Vining, R. W., Lewis, K. & Proctor, G. (1979). Effects of Nuclear War. US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, USA: Public. No. OTA-NS-89, vii + 151 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Thunborg, A. I., Allotey, F. K. A., Bouayad-Agha, F. K., Civic, M., Correa-Villalobos, F., Imai, R., Legault, A., Marker, J. K. A., Otegui, J. M., Oxley, A., Tinca, G. & Vellodi, M. A. (1981). Comprehensive Study on Nuclear Weapons. United Nations, New York, NY, USA: Report No. A/35/392, vii + 172 pp., illusti.Google Scholar
Westing, A. H. (1977). Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Environment. Taylor & Francis, London, England, UK: xi + 95 pp.Google Scholar
Westing, A. H. (1978). Neutron bombs and the environment. Ambio (Stockholm), 7, pp. 93–7.Google Scholar
Westing, A. H. (1980). Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment. Taylor & Francis, London, England, UK: xiv + 249 pp. [Reviewed on page 335 of this issue.]Google Scholar
Westing, A. H. & Lumsden, M. (1979). Threat of Modern Warfare to Man and his Environment: An Annotated Bibliography. UNESCO, Paris, France: Reports & Papers in the Social Sciences No. 40, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Wiesner, J., Brown, H., Drell, S., Garwin, R., Keeny, S., MacDonald, G., Miller, G., Neel, J. & Wood, A. (1975). Analyses of Effects of Limited Nuclear War. US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, USA: v + 156 pp., illustr.Google Scholar