Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:23:14.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Four Decades of Environmental Change and Their Influence upon Native Wildlife and Fish on the Mid-Columbia River, Washington, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

William H. Rickard  and
Donald G. Watson
William H. Rickard
Affiliation:
Senior Staff Scientist and Senior Research Scientist, respectively, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Donald G. Watson
Affiliation:
Senior Staff Scientist and Senior Research Scientist, respectively, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Hanford Reach of the Columbia River has experienced a great deal of human-imposed environmental change within the past 40 years, as has much of the adjacent land. The major disturbances have been from hydroelectric dams' construction and an intensive expansion of irrigated agriculture. A notable exception to the steady expansion of agriculture and dam-building has been the 1,400 km2 Hanford Site, which was established in 1943. Today, the Hanford Site consists mostly of undeveloped land that still supports native vegetation. It is free from agricultural practices, and has also been essentially free from livestock grazing and the shooting of animal wildlife. This conservative land-use has favoured populations of native wildlife that use the riverine habitats of the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River—e.g. Mule Deer, Canada Goose, and Great Blue Heron, are notable instances.

The Hanford Reach supports the only mainstem Chinook Salmon spawning habitat on the Columbia River. This population is maintained by a combination of natural spawning and artificial propagation in concert with a regulated harvest of returning adults. Numbers of mainstem spawning Salmon have increased markedly in the past 10 years, and this has attracted increasing numbers of wintering Bald Eagles to the Hanford Reach.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1985 , pp. 241 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ball, I.J., Bowhay, E.L. & Yocum, C.E. (1982). Ecology and Management of the Western Canada Goose in Washington. Washington Dept of Game, Biol. Bull. No. 17, vii + 67 pp.Google Scholar
Beasley, T.M., Ball, L.A. & Andrews, J.E. (1981). Hanfordderived plutonium in Columbia River sediments. Science, 214, pp. 913–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, C.D. (1973). Columbia River thermal effects study: Reactor effluent problems. J. Water Pollution Control Federation, 45(5), pp. 850–69.Google Scholar
Becker, C.D. & Fujihara, M.P. (1978). The bacterial pathogen, Flexibacter columnaris, and its epizootiology among Columbia River fish. American Fisheries Society, Monograph No. 2, 92 pp.Google Scholar
Blus, L.J., Henny, C.J., Lenhart, D.J. & Cromartie, E. (1979). Effects of heptachlor-treated cereal grains on Canada Geese in the Columbia Basin. Pp. 105–16 in Management and Biology of Pacific Flyway Geese (Eds Jarvis, R.L. & Bartonek, J.C.). Oregon State University Bookstore, Corvallis, Oregon, USA: 346 pp.Google Scholar
Books, G.G. (in press). Avian interactions with mid-Columbia River water-level fluctuations. Northwest Science.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R., Thompson, B.C., Fitzner, R.E. & Miller, D.E. (1979). Increasing populations of Ring-billed and California Gulls in Washington State. Western Birds, 10, pp. 31–6.Google Scholar
Cushing, C.E., Watson, D.G., Scott, A.J. & Gurtisen, J.M. (1981). Decrease of radionuclides in Columbia River biota following the closure of Hanford reactors. Health Physics, 41, pp. 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daubenmire, R. (1970). Steppe vegetation of Washington. Wash. State Agric. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull., 60, 131 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, J.J. & Foster, R.F. (1958). Bioaccumulation of radioisotopes through food-chains. Ecology, 39, pp. 530–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWaard, B.D. (1981). Reproduction and Ecology of Canada Geese on the Hanford Reservation, 1953–1980. MS thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA: 87 pp.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, L.E., Hanson, E.E. & Cadwell, L.L. (1984). Movement and activity patterns of Mule Deer in the sagebrushsteppe region. J. Mammalogy, 65, pp. 404–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzner, R.E. & Hanson, W.C. (1979). A congregation of wintering Bald Eagles. Condor, 81, pp. 311–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzner, R.E., Rickard, W.H. & Hinds, W.T. (1982). Excrement from Heron colonies for environmental assessment of toxic elements. Env. Monit. and Assessment, 1, pp. 383–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzner, R.E. & Rickard, W.H. (1983). Canada Goose nesting performance along the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River, 1971–1981. Northwest Science, 57. pp. 267–72.Google Scholar
Foster, R.F. (1972). The Hanford story and its contributions of radioactivity to Columbia River water. Chapter 1 in The Columbia River Estuary and Adjacent Ocean Waters Bioenvironmental Studies (Eds Pruter, A.T. & Alverson, D.L.). University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA: xiii + 868 pp.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C. (1960). Accumulation of radioisotopes from fallout by terrestrial animals at Hanford, Washington. Northwest Science, 34, pp. 89–98.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C. & Case, A.C. (1963). A method of measuring waterfowl dispersion utilizing phosphorus-32 and zinc-65. Pp. 451–4 in Radioecology: Proceedings of the First National Symposium in Radioecology held at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado (Eds Schultz, V. & Klement, A.W.). (10–15 September 1961.) Rheinhold Publishing Corporation. New York, NY, USA: xvii + 746 pp.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C. & Eberhardt, L.L. (1971). A Columbia River Canada Goose population. Wildl. Monogr., No. 28, 61 pp.Google Scholar
Haynes, J.M., Gray, R.H. & Montgomery, J.C. (1981). Diet and seasonal movements of sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in the mid-Columbia River. Fish Bull., 79, pp. 367–70.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J.D. (1975). Tagging Mule Deer fawns in south-central Washington. Northwest Science 4. pp. 253–60.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. & Foster, R.F. (1957). Studies of Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus dolomieui) in the Columbia River near Richland, Washington. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 86, pp. 112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, R.J. (1982). Wildlife toxicology. Env. Set and Tech., 16, pp. 448A–53A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J.C., Fickeisen, D.H. & Becker, C.D. (1980). Factors influencing Smallmouth Bass production in the Hanford area, Columbia River. Northwest Science, 54(4), pp. 296–305.Google Scholar
Page, T.L., Neitzel, D.A. & Gray, R.H. (1978). Comparative fish impingement at two adjacent water intakes on the mid-Columbia River. Pp. 257–66 in Fourth National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement (Ed. Jensen, L.D.). Ecological Analysts, Melville, New York, NY, USA: xx + 424 pp.Google Scholar
Rickard, W.H. & Sweany, H.A. (1977). Radionuclides in Canada Goose eggs. Pp. 623–7 in Biological Implications of Metals in the Environment (Eds Wildung, R.E. & Drucker, H.). Conf-750929, TIC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA: ix + 682 pp.Google Scholar
Rickard, W.H., Hedlund, J.D. & Schreckhise, R.G. (1978). Rejecta cast from heron nests as an indicator of food-chain contamination. The Auk, 95, pp. 425–7.Google Scholar
Rickard, W.H., Hanson, W.C. & Fitzner, R.E. (1982). The nonfisheries biotic resources of the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River. Northwest Science, 56, pp. 62–76.Google Scholar
Sauer, R.H. & Leder, J.E. (in press). The status of Yellowcress in Washington. Northwest Science (accepted).Google Scholar
Sauer, R.H., Mastrogiuseppe, J. & Smookler, R. (1978). Astragalus columbianus: Rediscovery of an ‘extinct’ species. Brittonia, 31, pp. 261–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servheen, C. W. (1975). Ecology of Wintering Bald Eagles on the Skagit River, Washington. M.S. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA: 96 pp.Google Scholar
Springer, J.T. (1980). Fishing behavior of Coyotes on the Columbia River. J. Mammalogy, 61, pp 373–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalmaster, M.V., Newman, J.R. & Hansen, A.J. (1979). Population dynamics of wintering Bald Eagles on the Nooksack River, Washington. Northwest Science, 53. pp. 126–31.Google Scholar
Steigers, W.D. & Flinders, J.T. (1980). Mortality of Mule Deer fawns in south-central Washington. J. Wildlife Manage., 44, pp. 381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sula, M.J. (1980). Radiological Survey of Exposed Shorelines and Islands of the Columbia River between Vernita and the Snake River Confluence. (PNL-3127.) Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA: 42 pp. + appendix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D.G. (1970). Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning in the Columbia River Near Hanford, 1947–1979. (BNWL-1515.) Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA: 40 pp. + appendix.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D.G. & Davis, J.J. (1957). Concentration of Radioisotopes in Columbia River Whitefish in the Vicinity of the Hanford Atomic Products Operation, Richland, Washington. (HW-4852.) Hanford Atomic Products Operations, Richland, Washington, USA: 136 pp. + appendix.Google Scholar