Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T10:23:16.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Human Activity on Shorebirds in Two Coastal Bays in Northeastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Joanna Burger
Joanna Burger
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Bureau of Biological Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of human activities on shorebirds migrating through Raritan and Delaware Bays (New Jersey, USA) were examined from late April to late October 1982. Less than 5% of the 471,055 shorebirds counted in the censuses were in Raritan Bay, and only eight species accounted for 95% of the total. Bird populations peaked during late May to early June, and had a secondary peak in early August. People walking accounted for 43% (Raritan Bay) and 50% (Delaware Bay) of the disturbances. Other disturbances, in descending order of abundance, were of fishermen, airplanes, dogs, clam-diggers, off-road vehicles, boats, children, and joggers.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Summer 1986 , pp. 123 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burger, J. (1981). The effect of human activity on birds at a coastal bay. Biological Conservation, 21 (3), pp. 231–41, map.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, P., Sibley, D., Sutton, C. & Wander, W. (1982). Aerial surveys in Delaware Bay: confirming an enormous spring staging area for shorebirds. Wader Study Group Bull, 35, pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.A. (1979). Notes on Charadriiformes of the south coast of Peru. Pp. 49–52 in Pitelka, q.v.Google Scholar
Isleib, M.E. (1979). Migratory shorebird populations on the Cooper River Delta and Eastern Prince William Sound, Alaska. Pp. 125–30 in Pitelka, q.v.Google Scholar
Jenni, D.A. & Betts, B.J. (1978). Sex differences in nest construction, incubation and parental behavior in the polyandrous American Jacana (Jacana spinosa). Anim. Behav., 26, pp. 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R.I.G., Harrington, B.A. & Leddy, L.E. (1979). Migration routes and stopover areas of North American Red Knot Calidris canutus wintering in South America. WSG Bulletin, 28, pp. 35–9.Google Scholar
Pitelka, F.A. (Ed.). (1979). Shorebirds in Marine Environments. (Studies in Avian Biology No. 2.) Cooper Ornithological Society, Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA: vii + 261 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Prater, A.J. (1981). Estuary Birds of Britain and Ireland. T. & A.D. Poyser Ltd, Calton, England, UK: 440 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Senner, S.E. (1979). An evaluation of the Cooper River Delta as a critical habitat for migrating shorebirds. Pp. 131–46 in Pitelka, q.v.Google Scholar
Senner, S.E. & Howe, M.A. (1984). Conservation of nearctic shorebirds. Pp. 379–421in Behavior of Marine Animals, vol. 5: Shorebirds: Populations and Breeding Behavior (Eds Burger, J. & Olla, B.). Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA: xv + 436 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wander, W. & Dunne, P.J. (MS, 1981). A Preliminary Assessment of the Spring Shorebird Migration Along the Delaware Bayshore of New Jersey. Unpubl. Rept, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office Migr. Bird Mgmt [not available for checking].Google Scholar