No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Impacts of soil and water conservation measures on farm technical efficiency in the semi-arid tropics of central India
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2024
Summary
Natural resources such as soil and water are essential to agriculture, especially in arid and semi-arid rain-fed areas, yet the impacts of managing these crucial natural resources on farm technical efficiency are little known. Using data from 400 households with 1031 plots, we examined the impacts of soil and water conservation measures (SWCMs) on the technical efficiency of farmers in the semi-arid Bundelkhand (central India). We estimated stochastic production frontiers, considering potential self-selection bias stemming from both observable and unobservable factors in the adoption of SWCMs at the farm level. The farm technical efficiency for adopters of SWCMs ranged from 0.68 to 0.72, and that for non-adopters ranged from 0.52 to 0.65, depending on how biases were controlled for. As the average efficiency is consistently higher for adopter farmers than the control group, promoting SWCMs could help to increase input use efficiency, especially in resource-deprived rain-fed systems in the semi-arid tropics.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation
References
Abdulai, A-N, Abdulai, A (2017) Examining the impact of conservation agriculture on environmental efficiency among maize farmers in Zambia. Environment and Development Economics 22: 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, J, Noel, S, Mikhail, M (2009) Review of Agricultural Water Management Intervention Impacts at the Watershed Scale: A Synthesis Using the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Stockholm Environment Institute, Project Report, Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, R, Ghosh, BN, Mishra, PK, Mandal, B, Rao, CS, Sarkar, D et al. (2015) Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability 7: 3528–3570.Google Scholar
Bravo-Ureta, BE, Greene, W, Solís, D (2012) Technical efficiency analysis correcting for biases from observed and unobserved variables: an application to a natural resource management project. Empirical Economics 43: 55–72.Google Scholar
Chavas, J, Petrie, R, Roth, M (2005) Farm household production inefficiency in the Gambia: resource constraints and market failures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 60–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H, Zhu, T, Krotta, M, Calvo, JF, Ganesh, SP, Makot, I (2013) Measurement and evaluation of livelihood assets in sustainable forest commons governance. Land Use Policy 30: 908–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhary, BB, Dev, I, Singh, P, Singh, R, Sharma, P, Chand, K et al. (2022) Impact of soil and water conservation measures on farm productivity and income in the semi-arid tropics of Bundelkhand, central India. Environmental Conservation 49: 263–271.Google Scholar
Datta, N (2015) Evaluating impacts of watershed development program on agricultural productivity, income, and livelihood in Bhalki watershed of Bardhaman district, west Bengal. World Development 66: 443–456.Google Scholar
Diagne, M, Demont, M, Seck, P, Diaw, A (2013) Self-sufficiency policy and irrigated rice productivity in the Senegal river valley. Food Security 5: 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, M (2009) Economies of size in production agriculture. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition 4: 375–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO (2017) Productivity and efficiency measurement in agriculture: literature review and gaps analysis [www document]. URL https://www.fao.org/3/ca6428en/ca6428en.pdf
Google Scholar
Garg, KK, Anantha, KH, Nune, R, Venkataradha, A, Singh, P, Gumma, MK et al. (2020) Impact of landuse changes and management practices on groundwater resources in Kolar district, southern India. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 31: 100732.Google Scholar
GoI (2016a) Desertification and land degradation atlas of India. Indian Space Research Organization, Bengaluru [www document]. URL https://vedas.sac.gov.in/vedas/downloads/atlas/DSM/Desertification_Atlas_2016_SAC_ISRO.pdf
Google Scholar
GoI (2016b) State of Indian Agriculture 2015–16. New Dehli, India: Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India.Google Scholar
Greene, W (2010) A stochastic frontier model with correction for sample selection. Journal of Productivity Analysis 34: 15–24.Google Scholar
Gupta, GS (2019) Land degradation and challenges of food security. Review of European Studies 11: 63–72.Google Scholar
Koirala, KH, Mishra, A, Mohanty, S (2016) Impact of land ownership on productivity and efficiency of rice farmers: the case of the Philippines. Land Use Policy 50: 371–378.Google Scholar
Kosoe, EA, Osumanu, IK, Nabiebakye, HN (2020) Land degradation in semi-arid areas and farmers’ livelihoods: experiences from the lawra municipality of Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development 6: 752–760.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Singh, DR, Singh, A, Singh, NP, Jha, GK (2020) Does adoption of soil and water conservation practice enhance productivity and reduce risk exposure? Empirical evidence from semi-arid tropics (SAT), India. Sustainability 12: 6965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuven, E, Sianesi, B (2003) PSMATCH2: STATA Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing. Statistical Software Components Series S432001. Chestnut Hill, MA, USA: Department of Economics, Boston College.Google Scholar
Ma, W, Renwick, A, Yuan, P, Ratna, N (2018) Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China: an analysis accounting for selectivity bias. Food Policy 81: 122–132.Google Scholar
Malav, LC, Yadav, B, Tailor, BL, Pattanayak, S, Singh, SV, Kumar, N et al. (2022) Mapping of land degradation vulnerability in the semi-arid watershed of Rajasthan, India. Sustainability 14: 10198.Google Scholar
Mayen, C, Balagtas, J, Alexander, C (2010) Technology adoption and technical efficiency: organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meter, KJV, Steiff, M, McLaughlin, DL, Basu, NB (2016) The socio-ecohydrology of rainwater harvesting in India: understanding water storage and release dynamics across spatial scales. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 20: 2629–2647.Google Scholar
Mishra, PK, Singh, M, Kumar, G (2018) Water Management and Conservation Innovations for Doubling Farmers’ Income. ISSS Bulletin No. 32, Soil and Water Management Innovations towards Doubling the Farmers’ Income. New Dehli, India: Indian Society of Soil Science.Google Scholar
Mondal, B, Singh, A, Jha, GK (2012) Impact of watershed development programmes on farm-specific technical efficiency: a study in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Economics Research Review 25: 299–308.Google Scholar
Morais, GAS, Silva, FF, Freitas, COD, Braga, MJ (2021) Irrigation, technical efficiency, and farm size: the case of Brazil. Sustainability 13: 1132.Google Scholar
Nkegbe, PK, Shankar, B (2014) Adoption intensity of soil and water conservation practices by smallholders: evidence from northern Ghana. Bio-based and Applied Economics 3: 159–174.Google Scholar
Palanisami, K, Kumar, DS, Wani, SP, Giordano, M (2009) Evaluation of watershed development programmes in India using economic surplus method. Agricultural Economics Research Review 22: 197–207.Google Scholar
Pathak, H, Pal, S, Mohapatra, T (2020) Mahatma Gandhi’s Vision of Agriculture: Achievements of ICAR. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR, Rubin, DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55.Google Scholar
Singh, K, Tewari, SK (2021) Does the road to land degradation neutrality in India is paved with restoration science? Restoration Ecology 30: e13585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P, Choudhary, BB, Dwivedi, RP, Arunachalam, A, Kumar, S, Dev, I (2023) Agroforestry improves food security and reduces income variability in semi-arid tropics of central India. Agroforestry Systems 97: 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, RK, Chaudhary, RS, Somasundaram, J, Sinha, NK, Mohanty, M, Hati, KM et al. (2020) Soil and nutrients losses under different crop covers in vertisols of central India. Journal of Soils and Sediments 20: 609–620.Google Scholar
Singha, C (2017) Causal Impact of the Adoption of Soil Conservation Measures on Farm Profit, Revenue and Variable Cost in Darjeeling District, India. SANDEE Working Paper No. 121-17. Kathmandu, Nepal: SANDEE.Google Scholar
Solís, D, Bravo-Ureta, BE, Quiroga, R (2007) Soil conservation and technical efficiency among hillside farmers in Central America: a switching regression model. Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 51: 491–510.Google Scholar
Stocking, M, Murnagham, N (2001) Handbook for the Field Assessment of Land Degradation. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Villano, R, Bravo-Ureta, BE, Solís, D, Fleming, E (2015) Modern rice technologies and productivity in the Philippines: disentangling technology from managerial gaps. Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vittal, KPR, Sinha, PK, Chary, GR, Sankar, GM, Srijaya, T, Ramakrishna, YS et al. (2004) Districtwise Promising Technologies for Rainfed Rice Based Production System in India. All India Co-Ordinated Research Project Dryland Agriculture. Hyderabad, India: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Wang, L, Huo, X, Kabir, MS (2013) Technical and cost efficiency of rural household apple production. China Agricultural Economic Review 5: 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaebiyo, G, Tesfay, Y, Assefa, D (2015) Socio-economic impact assessment of integrated watershed management in Sheka watershed, Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 6: 202–213.Google Scholar
Singh et al. supplementary material 1
Singh et al. supplementary material
File
73.2 KB
Singh et al. supplementary material 2
Singh et al. supplementary material
File
12 KB
Singh et al. supplementary material 3
Singh et al. supplementary material
File
11 KB
Singh et al. supplementary material 4
Singh et al. supplementary material
File
11.9 KB