Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:35:32.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictions for Cairo: A Reaffirmation, A Reversal, A Realignment, and A Refusal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Adil Najam
Adil Najam
Affiliation:
Department of Urban Studies & Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper analyses the preparatory process for the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), to see what it might suggest about the direction that the population debate has taken since the 1974 World Population Conference at Bucharest and its successor conference held at Mexico City in 1984. Given the insights obtained from the ICPD preparatory process, and the legacy of the preceding two UN population conferences, what can we say about the directions that the evolving population agenda may take at Cairo?

In an attempt to answer this question we make four predictions: (i) the linkage between population and development will be reaffirmed; (ii) United States' ‘Mexico City Policy’ will be formally reversed as the US will seek to recapture the leadership role in the field that it conceded in 1984; (iii) women's health issues will take centre-stage as a new focus in the ongoing debate on the larger ‘population question’ as the agenda is again realigned; and (iv) nations will once again refuse attempts by the population establishment to adopt quantitative population targets.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Summer 1994 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, Kurt W. (1989). Family Planning and Population Control: The Challenges of Successful Movement. Twayne, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: vii + 177 pp.Google Scholar
Burke, J. Grant (1974). The World Population Conference: An Overview. Journal of International Law and Economics, 9(3), pp. 367–73.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Betsy (1987). Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control and Contraceptive Choice. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA: xv + 368 pp.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Donald J. (1984). Success or Failure? Family Planning Programs in the Third World. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, USA: xviii + 161 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Holy, See (1994). Statement of the Head of the Delegation of the Holy See at the Beginning of the III Session of the Preparatory Committee for the International Conference on Population and Development. On computer network EcoNet, from Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB), igc:icpd.general, 04 8.Google Scholar
ICPD (1994). ICPD'94 [Briefing Kit]. ICPD Secretariat, New York, NY, USA: folder of 6 loose leaflets.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stanley P. (1987). World Population and the United Nations: Challenge and Response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xxxviii + 357 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David M. (1970). Birth Control in America: The Career of Margaret Sanger. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: xv + 320 pp.Google Scholar
Mahbub-ul-Haq, (1994). We cannot slip a condom on global poverty. The Earth Times (New York), VI(29), 04 20, p. 5, illustr.Google Scholar
Miró, Carmen A. (1977). The World Population Plan of Action: a political instrument whose potential has not been realized. Population and Development Review, 3(4), pp. 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najam, Adil (1993 a). International environmental negotiations: a strategy for the South. Pp. 187–230 in Papers on International Environmental Negotiations, Vol. III (Eds Susskind, Lawrence E., Moomaw, William R. & Najam, Adil). Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: x + 261 pp.Google Scholar
Najam, Adil (1993 b). The Numbers Game: tomorrow's fine, but what about today. The Earth Times (New York), V(37): 12 9, p. 29, illustr.Google Scholar
PDR (1984). Text of the US Position Statement at Mexico City. Population and Development Review, 10(3), pp. [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Tabah, Léon (1984). Preparations for the 1984 International Conference on Population. Population and Development Review, 10(1), pp. 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabbarah, Riad B. (1974). Population policy issues in international instruments: with special reference to the World Population Plan of Action. Journal of International Law and Economics, 9(3), pp. 419–54.Google Scholar
United States of America (cited as US) (1994). Statement of the Head of the Delegation of the United States of America at the III Session of the Preparatory Committee for the International Conference on Population and Development. On computer network EcoNet, from Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB), igc:icpd.general, 04 6.Google Scholar
Warwick, Donald P. (1982). Bitter Pills: Population Policies and their Implementation in Eight Developing Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xvii + 229 pp.Google Scholar