Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:05:01.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Compaction as a Constraint to Tree Growth in Tropical & Subtropical Urban Habitats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Chi Yung Jim
Chi Yung Jim
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Biogeography & Soil Science, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the many forms of above- and below-ground stresses facing urban trees, physical soil limitations are generally among the most persistent and least amenable to amelioration. Soil compaction is a common soil malady that afflicts many planting-sites and causes tree decline. The concept of soil structure in terms of porosity and moisture-suction is reviewed, to provide a basis for the interpretation of compaction as structural degradation. The reorganization of solid and interstitial void constituents, which can result in increased dentity of packing, is related to some fundamental physical and physico-chemical soil properties.

Compaction brings about changes in a wide spectrum of related geometric and other soil attributes, the consequences of which are often inimical to plant growth. Many deliberate and inadvertent actions in urban areas increase packing density, which can be diagnosed through some field and laboratory tests. The harmful effects of compaction is exerted via mechanical impediment and other indirect impacts on root growth. Excessively loose soils and soil crusts are discussed in the light of compaction concepts and in relation to tree growth.

A wide range of measures could be adopted to alleviate the problems of soil compaction. Preventive actions taken before tree planting are preferred to post-planting remedies which are cumbersome, and injurious to roots. Soils at planting sites could be partially improved by various mechanical means to reduce packing density and enhance aggregation. Coarse-textured materials with inherently high strength and resistance to dense packing could provide a stable medium for tree growth. The installation of subsurface aeration and drainage pipes could alleviate the ill-effects of compaction. Care should be taken to avoid structural degradation in stockpiling and construction activities.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 35 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdul-Kareem, A.W. & McRae, S.G. (1984). The effects on topsoil of long-term storage in stockpiles. Plant and Soil, 76, pp. 357–63, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, W.A. (1986). Practical aspects of sportsfield drainage. Soil Use and Management, 2(2), pp. 51–4, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberty, C.A., Pellet, H.M. & Taylor, D.H. (1984). Characterization of soil compaction at construction sites and woody plant response. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 2, pp. 48–53, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allmaras, R.R., Gupta, S.C., Swan, J.B. & Nelson, W.W. (1986). Hydro-thermal effects on corn root development in a Millisol. Transactions 13th Congress of International Society of Soil Science, Hamburg, Germany, volume 5, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Anderson, C.J., Campbell, D.J., Ritchie, R.M. & Smith, D.L.O. (1989). Soil shear strength measurements and their relevance to windthrow in Sitka spruce. Soil Use and Management, 5(2), pp. 62–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, J.R. & Smith, P.O. (1972). The relation between bulk density, available water capacity and air capacity of soils. Journal Soil Science, 23, pp. 475–80, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, W. (1966). The effect of traffic compaction on a number of soil properties. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 11, pp. 182–7, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D. (1980). The distribution and effectiveness of the roots of tree crops. Horticultural Reviews, 2, pp. 424–90, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S.W. (1990). Sands for Sports Turf Construction and Maintenance. Sports Turf Research Institute, Bingley, West Yorkshire, England, UK: 58 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bakker, J.W. & Hidding, A.P. (1970). Influence of soil structure and air content on gas diffusion in soils. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 18(1), pp. 37–48, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, B.C. (1987). Air permeability and gas diffusion measurements to quantify soil compaction. Pp. 15–23 in Soil Compaction and Regeneration (Eds Monnier, G. & Goss, M.J.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 167 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Barlett Tree Expert Company (1968). Street Tree Study for the District of Columbia Final Report. Stamford, Connecticut, USA: 253 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bavel, C.H.M. van (1965). Composition of soil atmosphere. Pp. 315–8 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling (Ed. Black, C.A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: 770 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Baver, L.D. & Farnsworth, R.B. (1940). Soil structure effects in the growth of sugar beet. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 5, pp. 45–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, H.H. & Martin, W. (1988). Selected physical properties of three soil types as affected by land use. Catena Supplement, 11, pp. 93–100, illustr.Google Scholar
Bernatzky, A. (1978). Tree Ecology and Preservation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: iv + 357 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Blake, G.R. & Hartge, K.H. (1986). Bulk density. Pp. 363–75 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Blevins, R.L., Holowaychuk, N. & Wilding, L.P. (1970). Micromorphology of soil fabric at a tree-soil interface. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 34, pp. 460–5, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodman, G.B. & Constantin, G.K. (1965). Influence of particle size distribution in soil compaction. Hilgardia, 36(15), pp. 567–91, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, G.H. & Koenigs, F.F.R. (1972). Physical and chemical aspects of the stability of soil aggregates. Pp. 955–73 in Proceedings Symposium on Fundamentals of Soil Conditioning (Ed. De Boodt, M.). State University of Ghent, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Ghent, Belgium: 171 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bouwer, H. (1986). Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. Pp. 825–44 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bradford, J.M. (1986). Penetrability. Pp. 463–78 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brewer, R. (1964). Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils. Wiley, New York, USA: xiii + 482 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brewer, R. & Sleeman, J.R. (1988). Soil Structure and Fabric. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, Australia: viii + 173 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1991). Guide for Trees in Relation to Construction (BS 5837: 1991.) Linford Wood, Milton Keynes, England, UK: 36 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. & Tursina, T. (1985). Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research, Albrighton, Wolverhampton, England, UK: 152 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Camp, C.R. & Gill, W.R. (1969). The effect of drying on soil strength parameters. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 33(5), pp. 641–4, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, J.C. Van (1961). Tolerance of trees to soil environment. Pp. 5–19 in Proceedings 37th National Shade Tree Conference (Ed. Tilford, P.E.), 20–25 08 1961, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: 232 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Camp, J.C. Van (1979). Tree preservation: the roots of the problem. The Morton Arboretum Quarterly, 15, pp. 33–40, illustr.Google Scholar
Cannell, R.Q. (1977). Soil aeration and compaction in relation to root growth and soil management. Applied Biology, 2, pp. 1–86, illustr.Google Scholar
Chancellor, W.J. (1971). Effects of compaction on soil strength. Pp. 190–212 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Vanden Berg, G.E.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Chauvel, A., Nobrega, M.T. De & Tessier, D. (1983). The effect of compaction and addition of lime on a latosol. Pp. 237–43 in Soil Micromorphology, Volume 1: Techniques and Applications (Eds Bullock, P. & Murphy, C.P.). A.B. Academic Publishers, Berk-hamsted, England, UK: xii + 366 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Tarchitzky, J., Brouwer, J., Moran, J. & Banin, A. (1980). Scanning electron microscope observation on soil crusts and their formation. Soil Science, 130, pp. 49–55, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevallerie, H. de la (1986). The ecology and preservation of street trees. Pp. 383–97 in Ecology and Design in Landscape (Eds Bradshaw, A.D., Goode, D.A. & Thorp, E.H.P.). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: x + 463 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cochran, P.H. & Brock, T. (1985). Soil Compaction and Initial Height Growth of Planted Ponderosa Pine. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note PNW-434, Portland, Oregon, USA: 4 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colderick, S.M. & Hodge, S.J. (1991). A study of urban trees. Pp. 63–73in Research for Practical Arboriculture (Ed. Hodge, S.J.). Forestry Commission Bulletin 97, HMSO, London, England, UK: vii + 222 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1982). Wilderness Campsite Impacts: Effect of Amount of Use. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, Research Paper INT-284, Ogden, Utah, USA: 34 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1983). Campsite Conditions in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, Research Paper INT-312, Ogden, Utah, US A: 18 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1986). Recreational impacts on backcountry campsites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Environmental Management, 10(5), pp. 651–9, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.N. & Fichtler, R.K. (1983). Campsite impact on three western wilderness areas. Environmental Management, 7, pp. 275–88, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craul, P.J. (1985 a). A description of urban soils and their desired characteristics. Journal of Arboriculture, 11(11), pp. 330–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Craul, P.J. (1985 b). Urban soils. Pp. 45–61 in Metria 5: Selecting and Preparing Sites for Urban Trees (Eds Kuhns, L.J. & Patterson, J.C.). Proceedings Fifth Conference Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 23–24 05 1985, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA: 100 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Craul, P.J. & Klein, C.J. (1980). Characterization of streetside soils in Syracuse, New York. Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance (METRIA) Proceedings, 3, 88–101.Google Scholar
Craul, P.J. & Patterson, J.C. (1989). The urban soil as a rooting environment. Pp. 97–102 in Proceedings Fourth National Urban Forestry Conference, 15–19 10 1989, St Louis, Missouri, USA: ix + 258 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, J.B. & Jim, C.Y. (1984). Experimental study of soil microfabrics induced by isotropic stresses of wetting and drying. Geoderma, 34, pp. 43–68, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielson, R.E. & Sutherland, P.L. (1986). Porosity. Pp. 443–61 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Downing, M.F. (1977). Landscape Construction. Spon, London, England, UK: xi + 247 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dunn, B.A., Lockaby, E.G. & Johnson, E.E. (1980). Camping and Its Relationship to Forest Soil and Vegetation Properties in South Carolina. (Forestry Research Series, No 34.) Department of Forestry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA: 20 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Emerson, W.W. (1959). The structure of soil crumbs. Journal of Soil Science, 10, pp. 235–44, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, W.W. (1967). A classification of soil aggregates based on their coherence in water. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 5, pp. 47–57, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D.D. & Buol, S.W. (1968). Micromorphological study of soil crusts. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 32, pp. 19–22, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1977). Soil Survey Interpretation for Engineering Purposes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Soils Bulletin 19, Rome, Italy: 24 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Farres, P. (1978). The role of time and aggregate size in the crusting process. Earth Surface Processes, 3, pp. 243–54, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foil, R.R. & Ralston, C.W. (1967). The establishment and growth of Loblolly Pine seedlings on compacted soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 31, pp. 565–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, H.G. (1987). The importance of pore volume and pore geometry to soil aeration. Pp. 25–9 in Soil Compaction and Regeneration (Eds Monnier, G. & Goss, M.J.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 167 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ghadiri, H. & Payne, D. (1979). Raindrop impact and soil splash. Pp. 95–104 in Soil Physical Properties and Crop Production in the Tropics. (Eds Lal, R. & Greenland, D.J.) John Wiley, New York, NY, USA: xiv + 551 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gill, W. & Berg, G.E. Vanden (1967). Soil Dynamics and Tillage Traction. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Handbook 316, Washington DC, USA: 511 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gilman, E.F., Leone, I.A. & Flower, F.B. (1982). Influence of soil gas contamination on tree root growth. Plant and Soil, 65, pp. 3–10, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, E.F., Leone, I.A. & Flower, F.B. (1987). Effect of soil compaction and oxygen content on vertical and horizontal root distribution. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 5(1), pp. 33–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinski, J. & Lipiec, J. (1990). Soil Physical Conditions and Roots. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA: 250 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Goss, M.J. (1987). The specific effects of roots on the regeneration of soil structure. Pp. 145–55 in Soil Compaction and Regeneration (Eds Monnier, G. & Goss, M.J.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 167 pp.Google Scholar
Grable, A.R. (1971). Effects of compaction on content and transmission of air in soils. Pp. 154–64 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Vanden Berg, G.E.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Greacen, E.L. (1986). Root response to soil mechanical properties. Transactions 13th Congress of International Society of Soil Science, Hamburg, Germany, volume 5, pp. 20–47.Google Scholar
Greacen, E.L. & Sands, R. (1980). Compaction of forest soils — review. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 18(2), pp. 163–89, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greacen, E.L., Barley, K.P. & Farrell, D.A. (1969). The mechanics of root growth in soils with particular reference to the implications for root distribution. Pp. 256–69 in Root Growth (Ed. Whittington, W.J.). Butterworths, London, England, UK: xi + 450 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Grey, G.W. & Deneke, F.J. (1986). Urban Forestry, 2nd edn.Wiley, New York, NY, USA: xv + 299 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. (1965). Micro-organisms and soil structure. Biological Reivew, 40, pp. 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S.C. & Larson, W.E. (1979). A model for predicting packing density of soils using particle size distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43, pp. 758–64, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haan, F.A.M. de & Valk, G.G.M. van der (1970). Effects of soil compaction, restricted aeration and frost injury on flower-bulb crops, I: Effects of compaction on physical properties of soil and root growth of ornamental bulbs. Proceedings 1st International Symposium on Flower Bulbs, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 326–32, illustr.Google Scholar
Hall, D.G.M., Reeve, M.J., Thomasson, A.J. & Wright, V.F. (1977). Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 9, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, England, UK: 75 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harris, R.F., Chesters, G. & Allen, O.N. (1966). Dynamics of soil aggregation. Advances in Agronomy, 18, pp. 107–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.W. (1983). Arboriculture: Care of Trees, Shrubs, and Vines in the Landscape. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: xiii + 688 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harris, W.L. (1971). The soil compaction process. Pp. 9–43 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Vanden Berg, G.E.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Heilman, P. (1981). Root penetration of Douglas-fir seedlings into compacted soil. Forest Science, 27, pp. 660–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Heinonen, R. (1977). Towards ‘normal’ soil bulk density. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41, pp. 1214–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R.E. & Patrick, W.H. jun., (1982). Soil aeration and plant productivity. Pp. 51–69 in CRC Handbook of Agricultural Productivity, Volume 1: Plant Productivity. (Ed. Rechcigl, M. jun.) CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA: 468 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hibberd, E.G. (1989). Urban Forestry Practice. Forestry Commission Handbook 5, HMSO, London, England, UK: 150 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hills, R.C. (1970). The Determination of the Infiltration Capacity of Field Soils Using the Cylinder Infiltrometer. Technical Bulletin No. 3, British Geomorphological Research Group, Geo Abstracts, Norwich, England, UK: 25 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J.M. (Ed.) (1974). Soil Survey Field Handbook: Describing and Sampling Soil Profiles. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, England, UK: ix + 99 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R.M. & Patrick, W.H. jun., (1969). Combined effect of oxygen content and soil compaction on root penetration. Soil Science, 108, pp. 408–13, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, B., Walmsley, T.J. & Bradshaw, A.D. (1991). Importance of soil physical conditions for urban tree growth. Pp. 51–62 in Research for Practical Arboriculture (Ed. Hodge, S.J.). Forestry Commission Bulletin 97, HMSO, London, England, UK: vii + 222 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. & Currie, J.A. (1956). Structural changes during bulk soil storage. Journal of Soil Science, 7, pp. 75–80, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impe, W.F. Van (1989). Soil Improvement Techniques and their Evolution. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: vi + 125 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Impe, W.F. Van, Boodt, M. De & Meyus, I. (1988). Improving the bearing capacity of top soil layers by means of a polymer mixture grout. Catena Supplement, 11, pp. 1–14, illustr.Google Scholar
Insley, H. & Buckley, G.P. (1986). Causes and prevention of establishment failure in amenity trees. Pp. 127–41 in Ecology and Design in Landscape (Eds Bradshaw, A.D., Goode, D.A. & Thorp, E.H.P.). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: 463 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1986). Experimental study of soil microfabrics induced by anisotropic stresses of confined swelling and shrinking. Geoderma, 37, pp. 91–112, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1987 a). Camping impacts on vegetation and soil in a Hong Kong country park. Applied Geography, 7, pp. 317–32, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1987 b). Trampling impacts of recreationists on picnic sites in a Hong Kong country park. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), pp. 117–27, 6 figs and 5 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1990). Stress, shear deformation and micromorphological clay orientation: a synthesis of various concepts. Catena, 17(4/5), pp. 431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kays, B.L. & Patterson, J.C. (1982). Soil drainage and infiltration. Pp. 5.1–5.25 in Urban Forest Soils: a Reference Workbook (Ed. Craul, P.J.). College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, USA: various paging, illustr.Google Scholar
Kirby, J.M. (1991). The influence of soil deformations on the permeability of air. Journal of Soil Science, 42(2), pp. 227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klute, A. (1986). (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, P.A. (1989). Natural recovery of compacted soils in semi-arid Montana. Physical Geography, 10(2), pp. 165–75, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, P.A. (1991). Long-term soil and vegetation recovery in five semi-arid Montana ghost towns. Professional Geographer, 43(4), pp. 486–99, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopinga, J. (1985 a). Site preparation practices in The Netherlands. Pp. 62–71 in METRIA 5: Selecting and Preparing Sites for Urban Trees (Eds Kuhns, L.J. & Patterson, J.C.). Proceedings Fifth Conference Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 23–24 05 1985, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA: 100 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kopinga, J. (1985 b). Research on street tree-planting practices in The Netherlands. Pp. 72–84 in METRIA 5: Selecting and Preparing Sites for Urban Trees (Eds Kuhns, L.J. & Patterson, J.C.). Proceedings Fifth Conference Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 23–24 05 1985, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA: 100 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Koppi, A.J., Douglas, J.T. & Moran, C.J. (1992). An image analysis evaluation of soil compaction in grassland. Journal of Soil Science, 43(1), pp. 15–25, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhns, L.J., Meyer, P.W. & Patterson, J.C. (1985 a). Creative site preparation. Pp. 92–100 in METRIA 5: Selecting and Preparing Sites for Urban Trees (Eds Kuhns, L.J. & Patterson, J.C.). Proceedings Fifth Conference Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 23–24 05 1985, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA: 100 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kuhns, L.J., Meyer, P.W. & Patterson, J. (1985 b). Creative site preparation. Agora (The Landscape Architecture Foundation Journal), 5(1), pp. 7–10, illustr.Google Scholar
Lees, J.C. (1972). Soil aeration response to drainage intensity in basin peat. Forestry, 45, pp. 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, M.H. & Schneider, G. (1977). Soil deterioration on campsites: northern forest types. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41, pp. 437–41, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, P. & Lutz, J.F. (1957). Soil crusting and some factors affecting it. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 21, pp. 485–91, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logsdon, S.D., Parker, J.C. & Reneau, R.B. jun., (1987). Root growth as influenced by aggregate size. Plant and Soil, 99, pp. 267–75, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D.S. (1958 a). Soil splash and the formation of surface crusts by raindrop impact. Soil Science, 85, pp. 261–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D.S. (1958 b). Permeability measurement of soil crusts formed by raindrop impact. Soil Science, 85, pp. 185–9, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie-Dawson, L.A., Mullins, C.E., Fitzpatrick, E.A. & Court, M.N. (1989). Seasonal changes in the structure of clay soils in relation to soil management and crop type, 1: Effect of crop rotation at Cruden Bay, NE Scotland. Journal of Soil Science, 40, pp. 269–81, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J.H. (1971). Practical Turfgrass Management. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, NY, USA: vii + 466 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Miller, R.W. (1988). Urban Forestry — Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: xii + 404 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Moehring, D.M. & Rawls, I.W. (1970). Detrimental effects of wet weather logging. Journal of Forestry, 68, pp. 166–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Monti, P.W. & Mackintosh, E.E. (1979). Effect of camping on surface soil properties in the boreal forest region of northwestern Ontario, Canada. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43, pp. 1024–9, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, C.E. (1991). Physical properties of soils in urban areas. Pp. 87–118 in Soils in the Urban Environment (Eds Bullock, P. & Gregory, P.J.). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: 152pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K. (1954). The swelling of montmorrillonite. Discussions Faraday Society, 18, pp. 120–34, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K. (1973). Forces between clay particles. Pp. 375–83 in Proceedings International Clay Conference (Ed. Serratosa, S.M.), 06 1972, Madrid, Spain: 453 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Olphen, H. Van (1963). An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry. Interscience, New York, NY, USA: 301 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pagliai, M. (1987). Micromorphometric and micromorphological investigation on the effect of compaction by pressures and deformations resulting from tillage and wheel traffic. Pp. 31–8 in Soil Compaction and Regeneration (Eds Monnier, G. & Goss, M.J.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: vi + 167 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pan, E. & Bassuk, N. (1985). Effects of soil type and compaction on the growth of Ailanthus altissima seedlings. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 3(4), pp. 158–62, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankhurst, E.S. (1980). The effect of natural gas on trees and other vegetation. Landscape Design, 2, pp. 32–3, illustr.Google Scholar
Patterson, J.C. (1976). Soil compaction and its effects upon urban vegetation. Pp. 91–102 in Better Trees for Metropolitan Landscapes (Eds Santamour, F.S. jun., Gerhold, H.D. & Little, S.). General Technical Report NE-22, US Department of Aglriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, USA: 256 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Patterson, J.C. (1977). Soil compaction — effects on urban vegetation. Journal of Arboriculture, 3, pp. 161–7.Google Scholar
Patterson, J.C. & Mader, D.L. (1982). Soil compaction: causes and control. Pp. 3.1–3.15 in Urban Forest Soils: a Reference Workbook (Ed. Craul, P.J.). College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, USA: various paging, illustr.Google Scholar
Patterson, J.C., Murray, J.J. & Short, J.R. (1980). The impact of urban soil on vegetation. Proceedings Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, 18–20 06 1980, State University of New Jersey, Rutgers, New Jersey, USA, volume 3, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Payne, D. (1954). Some factors affecting the breakdown of soil crumbs on rapid wetting. Transactions 5th International Congress of Soil Science, volume 2, pp. 52–8.Google Scholar
Pearson, R.W. (1965). Soil environment and root development. Pp. 110–5 in Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use (Eds Pierre, W.H., Kirkham, D., Pesek, J. & Shaw, R.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xii + 295 pp.Google Scholar
Perry, T.O. (1982). The ecology of tree roots and the practical significance thereof. Journal of Arboriculture, 8(8), pp. 197–211, illustr.Google Scholar
Perry, R.H. & Green, D.W. (Eds) (1984). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA: various paging, illustr.Google Scholar
Phene, C.J. (1986). Oxygen electrode measurement. Pp. 1137–59 in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xxviii + 1188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pirone, P.P., Hartman, J.R., Sall, M.A. & Pirone, T.P. (1988). Tree Maintenance, 6th edn.Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA: xiii + 514 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pittenger, D.R. & Stamen, T. (1990). Effectiveness of methods used to reduce harmful effects of compacted soil around landscape trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 16(3), pp. 55–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, D. (1992). Compacted soil — the silent killer. Tree Care Industry, 04 1992, pp. 22–4, illustr.Google Scholar
Quirk, J.P. (1978). Some physico-chemical aspects of soil structural stability — a review. Pp. 3–16 in Modification of Soil Structure (Eds Emerson, W.W., Bond, R.D. & Dexter, A.R.). Wiley, New York, NY, USA: xvii + 438 pp.Google Scholar
Ramsay, W.J.H. (1986). Bulk soil handling for quarry restoration. Soil Use and Management, 2(1), pp. 30–9, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, W.J. (1983). Estimating soil bulk density from particle size analysis and organic matter content. Soil Science, 135(2), pp. 123–5, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M.J., Smith, P.O. & Thomasson, A.J. (1973). The effect of density on water retention properties of field soils. Journal of Soil Science, 24, pp. 355–67, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisinger, T.W., Simmons, G.L. & Pope, P.E. (1988). The impact of timber harvesting on soil properties, and seedling growth in the south. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 12, pp. 58–67, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmer, D.L. (1991). Soil storage and handling. Pp. 76–86 in Soils in the Urban Environment (Eds Bullock, P. & Gregory, P.J.). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: ix + 152 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolf, K. (1991). Soil improvement and increased growth response from subsoil cultivation. Journal of Arboriculture, 17(7), pp. 200–4, illustr.Google Scholar
Ruark, G.A., Mader, D.L. & Tattar, T.A. (1982). The influence of soil compaction and aeration on the root growth and vigour of trees — a literature review, Part I. Arboricultural Journal, 6, pp. 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruark, G.A., Mader, D.L. & Tattar, T.A. (1983). The influence of soil moisture and temperature on the root growth and vigour of trees — a literature review, Part II. Arboricultural Journal, 7, pp. 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E.W. (1971). Soil structure: its maintenance and improvement. Journal of Soil Science, 22, pp. 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R.S. (1977). Plant Root Systems: Their Function and Interaction with the Soil. McGraw-Hill, London, England, UK: 298 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sands, R. (1984). Transplanting stress in Radiata Pine. Australian Forestry Research, 14, pp. 67–72, illustr.Google Scholar
Sands, R., Greacen, E.L. & Gerard, C.J. (1979). Compaction of sandy soils in Radiata Pine forests, I: A penetrometer study. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 17, pp. 101–13, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamour, F.S. jun., Gerhold, H.D. & Little, S. (Eds) (1976). Better Trees for Metropolitan Landscapes. US Dpartment of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-22, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, USA: 256 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Schnelle, M.A., Fencht, J.R. & Klett, J.E. (1989). Root systems of trees — facts and fallacies. Journal of Arboriculture, 15(9), pp. 201–5, illustr.Google Scholar
Shoba, S.A. & Sokolov, L.A. (1982). Changes in the microfabric of sod-podzolic soils in recreational load zones. Soviet Soil Science, 14(3), pp. 85–91, illustr.Google Scholar
Short, J.R. & Patterson, J.C. (1984). Urban soils of the Mall in Washington, DC. Park Science, 5(1), pp. 3–5, illustr.Google Scholar
Short, J.R., Fanning, D.S., Foss, J.E. & Patterson, J.C. (1986). Soils of the Mall in Washington, DC, II: Genesis, Classification and Mapping. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, pp. 705–10, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, E.T., Watson, G.W., Fraedrich, B.R. & Booth, D.C. (1990). Evaluation of soil aeration equipment. Journal of Arboriculture, 16(5), pp. 118–29, illustr.Google Scholar
Smith, G.D., Coughlin, K.J. & Fox, W.E. (1978). The role of texture in soil structure. Pp. 79–86 in Modification of Soil Structure (Eds Emerson, W.W., Bond, R.D. & Dexter, A.R.). Wiley, New York, NY, USA: xii + 438 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, P. & Thomasson, A.J. (1974). Density and water-release characteristics. Pp. 42–56 in Soil Survey Laboratory Methods (Eds Avery, B.W. & Bascomb, C.L.). Soil Survey England and Wales, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, England, UK: vi + 83 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1971). Guide for Interpreting Engineering Uses of Soils. Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA: 9 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1975). Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 436, Washington, DC, USA: v + 754 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Stewart, V.I. & Scullion, J. (1989). Principles of managing man-made soils. Soil Use and Management, 5(3), pp. 109–16, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacey, W.H. & Glossop, B.L. (1980). Assessment of topsoil handling techniques for rehabilitation of sites mined for bauxite within the Jarrah Forest of Western Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, pp. 195–201, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackett, J.L. & Pearson, R.W. (1964). Oxygen requirements for cotton seedling root penetration of compacted soil cores. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 28, pp. 600–5, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H.M. (1974). Root behavior as affected by soil structure and strength. Pp. 271–91 in The Plant Root and its Environment (Ed. Carson, E.W.). University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA: 324 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Taylor, H.M., Robertson, G.M. & Parker, J.J. jun., (1966). Soil strength-root penetration relations for medium- to coarse-textured soil materials. Soil Science, 102(1), pp. 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, U.M. (1971). Soil conditions as they affect plant establishment, root development, and yield: (F) effect of soil strength on seedling emergence, root growth and crop yield. Pp. 292–305 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Berg, G.E. Vanden). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A.J. (1978). Towards an objective classification of soil structure. Journal of Soil Science, 29, pp. 38–44, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P.J., Jansen, I.J. & Hooks, C.L. (1987). Penetrometer resistance and bulk density as parameters for predicting rootsystem performance in mine soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, pp. 1288–92, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vomocil, J.A. & Flocker, W.J. (1961). Effect of soil compaction on storage and movement of soil air and water. Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 4, pp. 242–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Waddington, D.V. & Barker, J.H. (1965). Influence of soil aeration on the growth and chemical composition of three grass species. Agronomy Journal, 57, pp. 253–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagar, J.A. (1985). Reducing surface rooting of trees with control planters and wells. Journal of Arboriculture, 11(6), pp. 165–71, illustr.Google Scholar
Walmsley, T.J., Hunt, B. & Bradshaw, A.D. (1991). Root growth, water stress and tree establishment. Pp. 38–44 in Research for Practical Arboriculture (Ed. Hodge, S.J.). Forestry Commission Bulletin 97, HMSO, London, England, UK: vii + 222 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wargo, P.M. (1983). Effects and consequences of stress on root physiology. Journal of Arboriculture, 9(7), pp. 173–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Warkentin, B.P. (1971). Effects of compaction on content and transmission of water in soils. Pp. 126–53 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Vanden Berg, G.E.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Warner, J.W. jun., & Hanna, W.W. (1982). Preliminary Report Soil Survey of Central Park, New York, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, and Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, New York, NY, USA: 107 pp.Google Scholar
Watson, G.W. (1988). Organic mulch and grass competition influence tree root development. Journal of Arboriculture, 14(8), pp. 200–3, illustr.Google Scholar
Weddle, A.E. (1979). Landscape Techniques, 2nd edn. Heinemann, London, England, UK: 265 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Whiteley, G.M. & Dexter, A.R. (1984). Displacement of soil aggregates by elongating roots and emerging shoots of crop plants. Plant and Soil, 77, pp. 131–40, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersum, L.K. (1957). The relationship of the size and structural rigidity of pores to their penetration by roots. Plant and Soil, 9, pp. 75–85, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, W.O. & Raney, W.A. (1971). Effect of compaction on content and transmission of heat in soils. Pp. 165–77 in Compaction of Agricultural Soils (Eds Barnes, K.K., Carleton, W.M., Taylor, H.M., Throckmorton, R.I. & Vanden Berg, G.E.). American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA: 471 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Yelenosky, G. (1963). Soil aeration and tree growth. Proceedings 39th International Shade Tree Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 08 1963, pp. 16–25.Google Scholar
Yelenosky, G. (1964). Tolerance of trees to deficiencies of soil aeration. Proceedings 40th International Shade Tree Conference, Houston, Texas, 08 1964, pp. 127–47.Google Scholar
Yong, R.N. & Warkentin, B.P. (1975). Soil Properties and Behaviour. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 449 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Youngberg, C.T. (1959). The influence of soil conditions following tractor logging on the growth of planted Douglas-fir seedlings. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 23, pp. 76–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zisa, R.P., Halverson, H.G. & Stout, B.B. (1980). Establishment and Early Growth of Conifers on Compact Soils in Urban Areas. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Experimental Station Research Paper NE-451, Bromall, Pennsylvania, USA: 8 pp., illustr.Google Scholar