Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T02:48:49.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Article: Grading and Strength of Salvaged Lumber from Residential Buildings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Abdol R. Chini  and
Lucy Acquaye
Abdol R. Chini*
Affiliation:
Center for Construction and Environment, M. E Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Lucy Acquaye
Affiliation:
M. E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
*
Abdol R. Chini, Center for Construction and Environment, M. E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction, University of Florida, FAC 101, PO Box 115703, Gainesville, FL 32611; (fax) 352-392-9606; (e-mail) chini@ufl.edu.
Get access

Extract

Buildings that need to be removed are normally demolished and deposed ofin landfills. Current trends focus on material recovery and reuse as a means to conserve our natural resources and promote environmentally acceptable disposal methods. This research was conducted to evaluate the grading and mechanical properties of lumber salvaged from deconstruction of several residential buildings in Gainesville, Florida. Results of visual grading showed that more than half of the pieces (57%) had damages due to use, construction, and deconstruction that resulted in reduction of their grades. Trimming the ends of damaged pieces resulted in grade increase, but of course reduced the length of the salvaged lumber pieces. Compared to virgin lumber with the same grade and tested under the same conditions, the salvaged lumber was on average denser and had a higher bending stress and modulus of elasticity. Although the findings of this study are limited because the sample sizes were rather small, the salvaged lumber was of such strength as to merit its structural use in building construction. More research data is needed to determine if the properties of recycled lumber differ significantly from the properties of virgin lumber.

Type
Features & Reviews
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 247 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Forest & Paper Association. 1997. National Design Specification for Wood Construction Supplement. American Forest & Paper Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1992. D 4442—Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Based Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1993a. D 2395—Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Wood and Wood-Based Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1993b. D 245—Standard Practice for Establishing Structural Grades and Related Allowable Properties for Visually Graded Lumber. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1994. D198—Standard Methods of Static Tests of Lumber in Structural Sizes. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Durbak, I., Green, D. W., Highley, T. L., Howard, J. L., McKeever, D. B., Miller, R. B., Pettersen, R. C., Rowell, R. M., Simpson, W. T., Skog, K. E., White, R. H., Winandy, I. E., Zerbe, J. I.. 1998. Wood. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th edition. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Falk, R. H., DeVisser, D., Cook, S., and Stansbury, D.. 1999. Effect of Damage on the Grade Yield of Recycled Lumber. Forest Products Journal 49(7/8):71–79.Google Scholar
Falk, R. H., Green, D., and Lantz, C. S.. 1999. Evaluation of Lumber Recycled from an Industrial Military Building. Forest Products Journal 49(5):49–55.Google Scholar
Guy, B., and McLendon, S.. 1999. Building Deconstruction: Reuse and Recycling of Building Materials. Center for Construction and Environment, Report to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
Holmes, H. 1997. Bringing Down the House. Hearth & Home, 09/10.Google Scholar
Home-Brine, P., and Falk, R.. 1999. Knock on Wood: Real Reqcycling Opportunities Are Opening Up. Resource Recycling 08:42–46.Google Scholar
Southern Pine Inspection Bureau. 1994. Standard Grading Rules for Southern Pine Lumber. Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, Pensacola, FLGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. 1993. The Northwestern Timber Debate. Environmental Building News 2(3):11–17.Google Scholar