Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:15:57.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptation of Mahoney, Type I, poliomyelitis virus to suckling mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Golda selzer
Affiliation:
The C.S.I.R.O. and U.C.T. Virus Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Cape TownZA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Mahoney, Type I, poliomyelitis virus undergoes two ‘cycles’ of multiplication in the CNS of suckling mice—the first within 48 hr. after intracerebral inoculation, and the second approximately 10 days later. The former may not be associated with paralysis whilst the latter usually is.

By to-and-fro passage in suckling mouse brain and monkey kidney-tissue culture there is a gradual increase in the amount of virus obtained during the early multiplication cycle in suckling mouse brains and associated with this is the occurrence of early paralysis in 80% or more of these mice. The virus capable of causing early paralysis in infant mice is gradually lost by direct mouse-to-mouse passage.

The occurrence of two variants is postulated, one of these apparently nonparalytic and multiplying selectively in suckling brains.

The author would like to thank the late Prof. M. van den Ende for his stimulating discussions and advice, Dr P. K. Olitsky of New York for his constant interest, and Mr T. C. Norcott for his able technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

References

Cairns, H. J. F. (1951). The growth of influenza viruses and Newcastle disease virus in mouse brain. Brit. J. exp. Path. 32, 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Melnick, J. L., Rappaport, C., Banker, D. D. & Bhatt, P. N. (1955). Stabilized suspension of monkey kidney cells suitable for intercontinental shipment. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 88, 678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, R. W. & Frankel, J. W. (1952). Interference as a factor in the adaptation to mice of a strain of dengue virus. Bact. Proc. Soc. Amer. Bact. p. 85.Google Scholar
Selzer, G., Sacks, M. & van den Ende, M. (1952). Adaptation and multiplication rate of the MEF1 strain of poliomyelitis in new-born mice. S. Afr. med. J. 26, 201.Google Scholar
van den Ende, M., Linder, A. M. & Kaschula, V. R. (1954). Experiments with the Cyprus strain of bluetongue virus: multiplication in the CNS of mice and complement fixation. J. Hyg., Camb., 52, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar