Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T14:19:15.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation and comparison of three commonly used statistical models for automatic detection of outbreaks in epidemiological data of communicable diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2005

P. ROLFHAMRE  and
K. EKDAHL
P. ROLFHAMRE
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), Solna, Sweden Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm University, Sweden Stockholm Group for Epidemic Modelling (S-GEM)
K. EKDAHL
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), Solna, Sweden Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm Group for Epidemic Modelling (S-GEM)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We evaluated three established statistical models for automated ‘early warnings’ of disease outbreaks; counted data Poisson CuSums (used in New Zealand), the England and Wales model (used in England and Wales) and SPOTv2 (used in Australia). In the evaluation we used national Swedish notification data from 1992 to 2003 on campylobacteriosis, hepatitis A and tularemia. The average sensitivity and positive predictive value for CuSums were 71 and 53%, for the England and Wales model 87 and 82% and for SPOTv2 95 and 49% respectively. The England and Wales model and the SPOTv2 model were superior to CuSums in our setting. Although, it was more difficult to rank the former two, we recommend the SPOTv2 model over the England and Wales model, mainly because of a better sensitivity. However, the impact of previous outbreaks on baseline levels was less in the England and Wales model. The CuSums model did not adjust for previous outbreaks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 134 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 863 - 871
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press