Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T04:40:49.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of factors governing potato-starch refection in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. M. Kon ,
S. K. Kon  and
A. T. R. Mattick
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

No accepted or acceptable explanation of the phenomenon has yet been put forward. It has been suggested by the various authors and particularly by Fridericia et al. (1927) that bacterial synthesis of vitamin B in the intestine of the rat may be the explanation of the condition. Schieblich & Rodenkirchen (1929) have described a “vibrio-like” organism which they claim to be responsible for refection, but this finding has so far not been confirmed. In a recent dissertation on refection Nathan (1935) believes that the explanation is coupled with the nature of the starch in the diet rather than with an infection with a specific type of organism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 1938 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

References

REFERENCES

Bechdel, , Eckles, & Palmer, (1926). J. Dairy Sci. 9, 409.Google Scholar
Bechdel, , Honeywell, , Dutcher, & Knutsen, (1927). Bull. Penn. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 213, p. 16.Google Scholar
Bechdel, , Honeywell, , Dutcher, & Knutsen, (1928). J. Biol. Chem. 80, 231.Google Scholar
Bliss, (1936). J. Nutrit. 11, 1.Google Scholar
Booher, & Kaneko, (1932). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 30, 69.Google Scholar
Clark, & Waters, (1933). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 52, 271.Google Scholar
Clark, , Zoller, , Dahlberg, & Weimar, (1920). J. Industr. Enging Chem. 12, 1165.Google Scholar
Cooper, (1914). J. Hygiene, 14, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, (1923). J. Biol. Chem. 56, 895.Google Scholar
Damon, (1924). J. Path. Bact. 27, 163.Google Scholar
Durant, (1930). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 133.Google Scholar
Dutcher, & Francis, (1924). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 21, 189.Google Scholar
Fridericia, (1926). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 2. Abstracts of Communications to the 12th Int. Physiol. Congress p. 55.Google Scholar
Fridericia, , Freudenthal, , Gudjonnsson, , Johansen, & Schoubye, (1927). J. Hygiene, 27, 70.Google Scholar
Gaglio, (1919). Policlinico, 25, 1381.Google Scholar
Griffith, (1935). J. Nutrit. 10, 667.Google Scholar
Guerrant, & Dutcher, (1932). J. Biol. Chem. 98, 225.Google Scholar
Guerrant, & Dutcher, (1934). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 31, 796.Google Scholar
Guerrant, , Dutcher, & Tomey, (1935). J. Biol. Chem. 110, 233.Google Scholar
Heller, , McElroy, & Garlock, (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 65, 255.Google Scholar
Innes, & Nicolaysen, (1937). Biochem. J. 31, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, (1929). Unpublished work.Google Scholar
Kon, (1931). J. Hygiene, 31, 543.Google Scholar
Kon, & Watchorn, (1928). J. Hygiene, 27, 321.Google Scholar
Mattick, (1931). Unpublished work.Google Scholar
Mendel, & Vickery, (1929). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 26, 552.Google Scholar
Muckenfuss, (1918). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 40, 1606.Google Scholar
Nathan, (1935). Undersøgelser over Refektion. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Osborne, & Mendel, (1911). Publ. Carneg. Instn, 156, Part 2, 59.Google Scholar
Pacini, & Russell, (1918). J. Biol. Chem. 34, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, , Kelly, & Husseman, (1933). Proc. Amer. Soc. Biol. Chem., J. Biol. Chem. 100, lxxvi.Google Scholar
Portier, & Randoin, (1920). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 170, 478.Google Scholar
Roscoe, (1927). J. Hygiene, 27, 103.Google Scholar
Salmon, (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 65, 457.Google Scholar
Scheunert, & Schieblich, (1923). Biochem. Z. 139, 57.Google Scholar
Scheunert, & Schieblich, (1927). Biochem. Z. 184, 58.Google Scholar
Scheunert, & Schieblich, (1927 a). Liebigs Ann. 453, 249.Google Scholar
Schieblich, (1929). Biochem. Z. 207, 458.Google Scholar
Schieblich, (1930). Biochem. Z. 220, 394.Google Scholar
Schieblich, & Rodenkerchen, (1929). Biochem. Z. 213, 234 and 245.Google Scholar
Shohl, (1931). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 28, 770.Google Scholar
Smith, , Cowgill, , & Croll, (1925). J. Biol. Chem. 66, 15.Google Scholar
Steenbock, , Sell, & Jones, (1923 a). J. Biol. Chem. 55, 411.Google Scholar
Steenbock, ., Sell, & Nelson, (1923 b). J. Biol. Chem. 55, 399.Google Scholar
Taylor, & Thant, (1929). Indian J. Med. Res. 16, 747.Google Scholar
Van Der, Walle (1922). Biochem. J. 16, 713.Google Scholar