Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T02:22:10.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacteriology of fresh water: III. The types of bacteria present in lakes and streams and their relationship to the bacterial flora of soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. B. Taylor
C. B. Taylor
Affiliation:
From the Freshwater Biological Association, Wray Castle, Ambleside, Westmorland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Approximately 800 cultures of bacteria have been isolated from samples of water taken from lakes and from some of their inflowing waters. The morphology and Gram-staining reaction of the cultures have been determined together with the reactions in nutrient gelatin, dextrose broth, nitrate broth, and litmus milk.

2. Many organisms grew poorly on artificial media, and were unable to grow in either dextrose or nitrate broth. In general the cultures showed weak physiological activity, particularly in litmus milk and in dextrose, though gelatin liquefaction was fairly common. Colonies produced on solid media were frequently pigmented, shades of yellow being particularly common. A significant feature was that most of the bacteria (95%) were rod-shaped, and though many cultures showed considerable variation in cell length and were consequently difficult to classify, short rods were in general more prevalent than long. Coccus forms made up less than 1 % of the toal number considered.

3. When the cultures were grouped according to their biochemical activities no consistent differences were observed between the types from near the surface and from near the bottom of a lake, nor between the lake and the inflow, but differences were observed in samples taken from the same lake on different occasions. Some types were common to both the lake and the inflows, while others occurred in only one of those habitats. Some types were found both near the surface of the lake and near the bottom, whilst others were confined to one depth.

4. A comparison of the types of bacteria isolated from waters with those found by other workers in soils shows that the main difference in the bacterial flora is the absence in water of the Gram-positive pleomorphic forms of the genera Mycobacterium and Corynebacterium and of Bact. globiforme Conn.;, all of which are common in soils of very widely different agricultural types.

5. In the discussion it is pointed out that, in common with soil types bacteria isolated from water cannot be adequately classified by the usual tests in carbohydrates; in dextrose broth, for instance, the reaction is often only a slight change in pH value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , May 1942 , pp. 284 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

References

REFERENCES

Bergey, D. H., (1939). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 5th ed.Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Boyce, R. W., & Hill, C. A., (1900). A classification of micro-organisms found in water. J. Path. Bact. 6,32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, H. J., Wolfe, G. E., & Ford, M., (1940). Taxonomic relationships of Alcaligenes spp. to certain soil saphrophytes and plant parasites. J. Bact. 39, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, G. W., & Johnson, G. A., (1899). On the differentiation and classification of water bacteria. J. Exp. Med. 4, 609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grouitch, (1918). Contribution à l'étude de la flore bactérienne du lac de Genève. Thesis, Institute of Botany of Geneva.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O., (1903). The kinds of bacteria found in river water. J. Hyg., Camb., 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavanchy, C. J., (1914). Contribution à l'étude de la flora bacterienne du lac de Genève. Thesis, Institute of Botany of Geneva.Google Scholar
Lochhead, A. G., & Taylor, C. B., (1938). Qualitative studies of micro-organisms. I. General introduction. Can. J. Res. C, 16, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marca, A. A., (1927). Contribution à l'éinide de la flore bacterienne du lac de Genève. Thesis, Institute of Botany of Geneva.Google Scholar
Mortimer, C. H., (1940). An apparatus for obtaining water from different depths for bacteriological examination. J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 641.Google ScholarPubMed
Snow, L. M., & Feed, E. B., (1926). Some characteristics of the bacteria of Lake Mendota. Trans. Wis. Acad. 8ci. Arts Lett. 22, 143.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B., (1938). Further studies of Bacterium globiforme and the incidence of this type of organism in Canadian soils. Soil Sci. 46, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. B., & Lochhead, A. G., (1937). A study of Bacterium globiforme in soils differing in fertility. Can. J. Res. C, 15, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. B., & Lochhead, A. G., (1938). Qualitative studies of soil micro-organisms. II. A survey of the bacterial flora of soils differing in fertility. Can. J. Res. C, 16, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topping, L. E., (1937). The predominant micro-organisms in soils. I. Description and classification of the organisms. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. 2, 97, 289.Google Scholar
Ward, H. M., (1897). Bacterial flora of the River Thames. Abstract from the fifth report to the Royal Society Water Research Committee, Proc. Roy. Soc. 61, 415.Google Scholar