Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T09:13:21.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the levels of faecal indicator bacteria in water and human faeces in a rural area of a tropical developing country (Sierra Leone)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

R. C. Wright
Affiliation:
Analytical Laboratory, Njala University College, P.M.B., Freetown, Sierra Leone
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The levels of faecal coliforms (FC), indole-positive FC (presumptive Escherichia coli), faecal streptococci (FS), Streptococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens in the natural water sources used by 29 rural settlements in Sierra Leone were investigated. Levels of the same indicators in human faeces were also investigated. The incidence of Salmonella spp. in both habitats and the temperature, pH and conductivity of water sources were also recorded. All water sources were contaminated with the indicator bacteria, mean numbers of which occurred in the relationship FC > presumptive E. coli ≏ FS ≏ C. perfringens > S. faecalis. FC were also predominant in human faeces, the relationship of means being FC ≏ presumptive E. coli > FS > S. faecalis > C. perfringens. The need for confirmation of FC counts obtained from water sources was indicated by the large number of positive tubes produced in the FC multiple-tube dilution test from some samples which could not be confirmed as presumptive E. coli. Salmonella spp. were isolated from 13 water sources and 6% of faecal samples. Mean water temperature was high (26·2 °C), pH low (5·04) and conductivity low (34μS cm−1). Presumptive E. coli was considered the most appropriate indicator of faecal pollution of the types of water investigated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

A.P.H.A. (1981). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th edn.Washington: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association & Water Pollution Control Federation.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. A. E. & Rowland, M. G. M. (1979). The relationship between rainfall and well water pollution in a West African (Gambian) village. Journal of Hygiene 83, 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T. & Steel, K. J. (1965). Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
D.H.S.S. (1969). The Bacteriological Examination of Water Supplies, Report No. 71 of the Department of Health and Social Security, Welsh Office and Department of the Environment, 4th edn.London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Drasar, B. S. (1974). Some factors associated with geographical variations in the intestinal microflora. In The Normal Microbial Flora of Man (ed. Skinner, F. A. and Carr, J. G.), pp. 187196. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dutka, B. J. (1973). Coliforms are an inadequate index of water quality. Journal of Environmental Health 36 (1), 3946.Google Scholar
Evison, L. M. & James, A. (1973). A comparison of the distribution of intestinal bacteria in British and East African water sources. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 36, 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evison, L. M. & James, A. (1977). Microbiological criteria for tropical water quality. In Water, Wastes and Health in Hot Climates (ed. Feachem, R. G., McGarry, M.G., & Mara, D. D.), ch. 3. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Feachem, R. G. (1975). An improved role for the faecal coliform to faecal streptococci ratios in the differentiation between human and non-human pollution sources. Water Research 9, 689690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feachem, R. G. (1980). Bacterial standards for drinking water quality in developing countries. Lancet ii, 255256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geldreich, E. E. & Kenner, B. A. (1969). Concept of faecal streptococci in stream pollution. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 41, R 336352.Google ScholarPubMed
Lonsane, B. K., Parhad, N. M. & Rao, N. U. (1967). Effect of storage temperature and time on the coliforms in water samples. Water Research 1, 309316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mara, D. D. (1978). Bacterial analysis of drinking water. In Small Water Supplies, Ross Institute Bulletin No. 10 (ed. Cairncross, S. and Feachem, R.), appendix A. London: School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
Mead, G. C. (1963). A medium for the isolation of Streptococcus faecalis, sensu strictu. Nature 197, 13231324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W. E. C. & Holdkman, L. V. (1974). Human faecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. Applied Microbiology 27 (5), 961979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moussa, R. S. (1965). Type distribution of coliforms isolated from faecal and non-faecal habitats. Indian Journal of Medical Research 53 (7), 629637.Google ScholarPubMed
Muhammed, S. I. & Morrison, S. M. (1975). Water quality in Kiambu District, Kenya. East African Medical Journal 52 (5), 269276.Google ScholarPubMed
Rao, N. U., Parhad, N. M., Rao, C. S. G. & Rao, K. S. (1968). Coliforms as indicators of faecal pollution. Environmental Health 10, 2128.Google Scholar
Slanetz, L. W. & Bartley, C. H. (1957). Numbers of enterococci in water, sewage and faeces determined by membrane-filter technique with an improved medium. Journal of Bacteriology 74, 591595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, E. W. (1972). Report on the results of the bacteriological, chemical and biological examination of London waters, 1969–1970. Report of the Metropolitan Water Board 44, 2223.Google Scholar
W.H.O. (1971). International Standards for Drinking Water, 3rd edn.Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
W.H.O. (1973). Community water supply and sewage disposal in developing countries. World Health Statistics Report 26 (11), 720783.Google Scholar
Wright, R. C. (1982). A medium for the rapid enumeration of Escherichia coli in the presence of other faecal coliforms in tropical waters. Journal of Hygiene 88, 265273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed