Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T11:23:07.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. A. J. Ayliffe ,
J. R. Babb ,
Kim Bridges ,
H. A. Lilly ,
E. J. L. Lowbury ,
Janet Varney  and
M. D. Wilkins
G. A. J. Ayliffe
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
J. R. Babb
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
Kim Bridges
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
H. A. Lilly
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
E. J. L. Lowbury
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
Janet Varney
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
M. D. Wilkins
Affiliation:
MRC Burns Unit, Birmingham Accident Hospital, and Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A standard hand-wash sampling technique was compared with a simple fingerstreak sampling method in assessing the relative effectiveness of a number of alternative preparations used for disinfecting the surgeon's hands (alcoholic 0-5% chlorhexidine, alcoholic 0-1% tetrabrom-o-methyl phenol, a 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution, aqueous 0-5% chlorhexidine, 2% 'Irgasan' detergent solution and, as control, bar soap). There was a fairly good correlation between the results of assessment by the two methods after a single disinfection and after six disinfections, three on one day and three on the next. Significant differences were shown in 21 comparisons between treatments when the hand-wash sampling test was used, and 16 of these comparisons also showed a significant difference by the finger-streak test.

Staphylococcus aureus was found in hand samplings from 5 out of 8 nurses in the Burns Unit of Birmingham Accident Hospital by the hand-wash sampling method and from 2 of the same 8 nurses by the finger-streak method; the numbers were small, and no Staph. aureus were isolated from the same hands after 1 min. wash in 70 % ethyl alcohol. Similar sampling on 29 nurses in other wards showed Staph. aureus on 3 nurses (one in large numbers) by the hand-wash technique and on 1 nurse by the finger-streak test; in only 1 nurse whose hands showed Staph. aureus before disinfection was the organism found, by hand-wash sampling, after disinfection.

Parallel sampling of nurses' hands after washing with soap and water and after disinfection with 95 % ethanol showed larger numbers of Staph. aureus in a hospital for skin diseases than in a general hospital, and a lower incidence and somewhat lower density of Staph. aureus after ethanol treatment than after washing with soap and water; Gram-negative bacilli, on the other hand, were commoner on hands in the general than in the skin hospital, and present in much smaller numbers after disinfection with ethanol than after washing with soap and water.

Antibiotic sensitivity tests showed the frequent recurrence on the hands of some nurses of multi-resistant Staph. aureus with resistance patterns similar to those found in infective lesions in some of the patients; different sensitivity patterns were usually found in staphylococci isolated from the nose. Even in wards where many patients were infected, carriage by nurses' hands of a particular strain ofStaph. aureus did not seem to last for more than a few days.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 259 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Barber, M. & Kuper, S. W. A. (1951). Identification of Staph. pyogenes by the phosphatase reaction. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 63, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, J. C. & Lilly, H. A. (1972). A quantitative method for investigating the bacteriology of skin: its application to burns. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 53, 550.Google Scholar
Lilly, H. A. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1974). Disinfection of the skin with detergent preparations of Irgasan DP 300 and other antiseptics. British Medical Journal iv, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1973). Skin preparation for operation. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, November, p. 627.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1973). Use of 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection. British Medical Journal i, 510.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Ayliffe, G. A. J. (1974). Preoperative disinfection of surgeons' hands: use of alcoholic solutions and effects of gloves on skin flora. British Medical Journal iv, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1960). Disinfection of the skin of operation sites. British Medical Journal ii, 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1963). Disinfection of the hands: removal of resident bacteria. British Medical Journal i, 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1964 a). Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. British Medical Journal ii, 230.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1964 b). Methods for disinfection of hands and operation sites. British Medical Journal ii, 551.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S. & Irwin, J. O. (1938). Estimation of bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732.Google Scholar
Noy, M., Brightwell, K., Ayliffe, G. A. J., Cross, M. & Axtell, D. (1974). Handwashing: surgical wards. Nursing Times, August 29, Contact p. 4.Google Scholar
Price, P. B. (1938). The bacteriology of normal skin; a new quantitative test applied to a study of the bacterial flora and the disinfectant action of mechanical cleansing. Journal of Infectious Diseases 63, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, S. & Ellis, H. (1972). Skin bacteria and skin disinfection reconsidered. British Medical Journal i, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. B., Tomfohrde, K. M., Rhodes, D. L. & Balows, A. (1972). A.P.I. system: a multitube method for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Applied Microbiology 24, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smylie, H. G., Logie, J. R. C. & Smith, G. (1973). From Phisohex to Hibiscrub. British Medical Journal iv, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar