Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:26:48.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation of phage type, biotype and source in strains of Salmonella typhimurium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. S. Anderson
Affiliation:
Enteric Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale Avenue, London
Linda R. Ward
Affiliation:
Enteric Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale Avenue, London
Maureen J. De Saxe
Affiliation:
Enteric Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale Avenue, London
D. C. Old
Affiliation:
Bacteriology Department, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
Ruth Barker
Affiliation:
Bacteriology Department, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
J. P. Duguid
Affiliation:
Bacteriology Department, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A series of 2092 cultures of Salmonella typhimurium isolated from human, animal and other sources in 57 countries were differentiated into 204 phage types and 19 primary and 147 full biotypes. Different biotypes belonged to the same phage type and different phage types to the same biotype, so the combination of typing methods differentiated strains more finely than either method alone: 574 different ‘phage type/biotypes’ were distinguished in 1937 cultures belonging to the 204 recognized phage types.

The combination of biotyping with phage-typing was valuable in studying the phylogeny and spread of epidemic strains by distinguishing clones of different biotype within the same phage type and by confirming the relationship between cultures isolated from widely dispersed clones and that between cultures isolated before and after a clone had undergone variation in phage type, biotype, colicin type or antibiotic-sensitivity pattern.

A widespread outbreak of infection with S. typhimurium phage type 141 in Scotland comprised independent dissemination of three clones of different biotypes, if, 9f and 31bd. During its epidemic spread in cattle in Britain between 1962 and 1969, another strain underwent variations in phage type (type 44 to type 29), biotype (type 26a to types 26d, 26bd, 26dgi, 26dz and 26i) and antibiotic sensitivity. A group of 275 non-fimbriate, non-inositol-fermenting and non-rhamnose fermenting (FIRN) strains, particularly associated with avian infections and thought to be clonal in origin, contained 27 phage types and 22 full biotypes in the primary biotypes 29–32.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Alfredsson, G. A., Barker, R. M., Old, D. C. & Duguid, J. P. (1972). Use of tartaric acid isomers and citric acid in the biotyping of Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Hygiene 70, 651.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. S. (1964). The phage typing of salmonellae other than S. typhi. In The World Problem of Salmonellosis (ed. van Oye, E.), p. 89. The Hague: Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. (1966). Influence of the Δ transfer factor on the phage sensitivity of salmonellae. Nature, London 212, 795.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. (1968a). The ecology of transferable drug resistance in the enterobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 22, 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. S. (1968b). Drug resistance in Salmonella typhimurium and its implications. British Medical Journal iii, 333.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. (1969a). Ecology and epidemiology of transferable drug resistance. In Ciba Foundation Symposium on Bacterial Episomes and Plasmids (ed. Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and O'Connor, Maeve), p. 102. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. (1969b). The use of bacteriophage typing in the investigation of outbreaks of salmonella food poisoning. In Bacterial Food Poisoning (ed. Taylor, J.), p. 47. London: The Royal Society of Health, 1969.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. (1971). The modern ecological study of Salmonella typhimurium infection. In Recent Advances in Microbiology (ed. Pérez-Miravete, A. and Peláez, D.), p. 381. Xth International Congress for Microbiology, Mexico City, 1970.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Lewis, M. J. (1965). Characterization of a transfer factor associated with drug resistance in Salmonella typhimurium. Nature, London 208, 843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. S., Threlfall, E. J., Carr, J. M., McConnell, M. M. & Smith, H. R. (1977). Clonal distribution of resistance plasmid-carrying Salmonella typhimurium, mainly in the Middle East. Journal of Hygiene 79, 425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. S., Threlfall, E. J., Carr, J. M. & Savoy, L. G. (1973). Bacteriophage restriction in Salmonella typhimurium by R factors and transfer factors. Journal of Hygiene 71, 619.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S., Ward, L. R., De Saxe, M. J. & De Sa, J. D. H. (1977). Bacteriophage-typing designations of Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Hygiene 78, 297.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Williams, R. E. O. (1956). Bacteriophage typing of enteric pathogens and staphylococci and its use in epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 94.Google Scholar
Callow, B. R. (1959). A new phage typing scheme for Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Hygiene 57, 346.Google Scholar
Duguid, J. P., Anderson, E. S., Alfredsson, G. A., Barker, R. & Old, D. C. (1975). A new biotyping scheme for Salmonella typhimurium and its phylogenetic significance. Journal of Medical Microbiology 8, 149.Google Scholar
Duguid, J. P., Anderson, E. S. & Campbell, I. (1966). Fimbriae and adhesive properties in salmonellae. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 92, 107.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. R. & Bruner, D. W. (1939). Further studies on biochemical and serological varieties of Salmonella typhimurium. American Journal of Hygiene (Section B) 29, 24.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1956). Phage typing of Salmonella typhimurium, its place in epidemiological and epizootiological investigations. Journal of General Microbiology 14, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. & Callow, B. R. (1943). Typing of paratyphoid B bacilli by means of Vi bacteriophage. British Medical Journal ii, 127.Google Scholar
Felix, A. & Callow, B. R. (1951). Paratyphoid B Vi-phage typing. Lancet ii, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. C. (1942). Die beim Hausgeflügel in Dänemark festgestellten Salmonellatypen. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abt. 1, Orig. 149, 222.Google Scholar
Harhoff, N. (1948). Gastroenteritisbaciller af Salmonellagruppen i Danmark. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Hohn, J. & Herrmann, W. (1936). Die Neuordnung der Typhus-Paratyphus-Enteritis Gruppe nach ihrem Verhalten zu den Ammonnährböden. Zeitschrift für Hygiene 118, 656.Google Scholar
Hohn, J. & Herrmann, W. (1937). Die Typen des Breslaubacteriums. Zeitschrift für Hygiene 119, 369.Google Scholar
Kallings, L. O. & Laurell, A. B. (1957). Relation between phage types and fermentation types of Salmonella typhimurium. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica 40, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, M., Bojlén, K. & Faarup, C. (1937). Bakteriologisk-Epidemiologiske Erfaringer om Infektioner med Gastroenteritisbaciller af Paratyphusgruppen. Bibliotek for Laeger, Copenhagen 129, 310.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. J. & Stocker, B. A. D. (1971). A biochemical subdivision of one phage type of Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Hygiene 69, 683.Google ScholarPubMed
Maclachlan, J. (1974). Salmonellosis in Midlothian and Peeblesshire. Public Health, London 88, 79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgenroth, A. & Duguid, J. P. (1968). Demonstration of different mutational sites controlling rhamnose fermentation in FIRN and non-FIRN rha-strains of Salmonella typhimurium: an essay in bacterial archaeology. Genetical Research, Cambridge 11, 151.Google Scholar
Old, D. C. (1972). Temperature-dependent utilization of meso-inositol: a useful biotyping marker in the genealogy of Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology 112, 779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rische, H. & Kretzschmar, W. (1962). Biochemotypen und Lysotypen von S. typhimurium. Archiv für Hygiene und Bakteriologie 146, 530.Google Scholar
Scholtens, R.Th. & Rost, J. A. (1972). Subdivision of Salmonella typhimurium into phage types and biotypes. Characterisation of transferable factors by means of phage typing. The increase of drug-resistance in salmonellas. Annali sclavo 14, 309.Google Scholar
Stocker, B. A. D. & Edgar, J. B. (1959). Annual Report of the Board of Governors of the Lister Institute, London, p. 13.Google Scholar