Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T20:00:07.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of various milk feeds on numbers of Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium in the stools of new-born infants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. H. Hewitt  and
Janet Rigby
J. H. Hewitt
Affiliation:
From the Division of Hospital Infection, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3 UJ
Janet Rigby
Affiliation:
From the Division of Hospital Infection, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3 UJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Escherichia coli was found in a similar proportion of stool specimens from infants who were breast-fed and from others fed on three different artificial-milk preparations. When E. coli was present its mean colony count in the stools of breast-fed infants was within the range of the mean counts for infants receiving the artificial-milk feeds.

There was no consistent relation between high counts of bifidobacteria (Lacto-bacillus bifidus) and low counts of E. coli. This suggests that measures aimed at implanting or stimulating the growth of bifidobacteria in the large intestine of artificially fed infants may not greatly influence the E. coli population therein.

The results are discussed in relation to the protection of artificially fed infants from E. coli enteritis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 129 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Arbuckle, J. B. R. (1970). The location of Escherichia coli in the pig intestine. Journal of Medical Microbiology 3, 333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbero, G. J., Runge, G., Fischer, D., Craweord, Mary N., Torres, F. E., & György, P. (1952). Investigations on the bacterial flora, pH, and sugar content in the intestinal tract of infants. Journal of Pediatrics 40, 152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barness, L. A., Barker, D., Guilbert, P., Torres, F. E. & György, P. (1957). Nitrogen metabolism of infants fed human and cow's milk. Journal of Pediatrics 51, 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrie, H., Martin, E. & Ansell, Christine (1975). Milk for babies. Lancet i, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T. & Steel, K. J. (1965). Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosse, V.Mary, Waillis, Patricia, G., Low, Ann & Henly, A. A. (1960). The value of two new preparations of cow's milk in the feeding of premature babies. Nutrition 14, 65.Google Scholar
Delrove, P. (1932). Le Bacillus bifidus. Son antagonisme bactérien. Thèse médicale, Paris.Google Scholar
Drasar, B. S. & Crowther, J. S. (1971). The cultivation of human intestinal bacteria. In Isolation of Anaerobes(ed. Shapton, D. A. and Board, R. G.), p. 93. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giunta, A. & Rosaschino, F. (1970). Importanza della tecnica di intubazione ‘end-to-end’ per lo studio della colonizzazione batterica intestinale nel lattante. Minerva Pediatrica 22, 2011.Google Scholar
Gyöbgy, P., Norris, R. F. & Rose, C. S. (1954). Bifidus factor. I. A variant of Lactobacillus bifidus requiring a special growth factor. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 48, 193.Google Scholar
Haenel, H. (1970). Human normal and abnormal gastrointestinal flora. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 23, 1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homma, N., Nishihara, K. & Isoda, K. (1967). Antibifiduskokken, deren biologische Eigenschaften und klinische Bedeutung. Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde 115, 296.Google Scholar
Laboratoire du Lyo-Bifidus (1969). Handbook: Leproblème de I'implantation artificidle de Bifidibacterium bifidum. Laboratoire Etienne, Rumilly, France.Google Scholar
Macgillivray, P. C, Finlay, H. V. L. & Binns, T. B. (1959). Use of lactulose to create a preponderance of lactobacilli in the intestine of bottle fed infants. Scottish Medical Journal 4, 182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McWilliam, P. K. A. (1960). Further experiences in the use of lactulose to create a lacto-bacillary preponderance in the intestines of bottle-fed babies. Scottish Medical Journal 5, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata, L. J. & Urrutia, J. J. (1971). Intestinal colonization of breast-fed children in a rural area of low socioeconomic level. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 176, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata, L. J., Mejicanos, Maria L. & Jiménez, F. (1972). Studies on the indigenous gastrointestinal flora of Guatemalan children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 25, 1380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, J. B. (1966). Möglichkeiten einer physiologischen antibiotischen Therapie beim Säugling mit Bacterium bifidum (Lactobacillus bifidus). Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde 114, 67.Google ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S. & Irwin, J. O. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. T. & Simmons, L. E. (1959). The inhibition of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and other Gram positive organisms by Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of General Microbiology 21, 457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petuely, F. (1956). Über die Darmflora des gesunden und kranken Säuglings. Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde 104, 155.Google Scholar
Petuely, F. (1957). Bifidus flora bei Flaschenkindern durch bifidogene substansen (Bifidusfactor). Zeitschrift für Kinderheilkunde 79, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynaud, M. (1959). Le facteur bifidus 2. Annales de Pédiatrie, Paris 6, 8.Google Scholar
Ruschmann, E. (1958). Untersuchungen über den Bakterien – Antagonismus in Stühlen von gesunden und kranken Säuglingen mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des Verhaltens von B. bifidum und Dyspepsiecoli. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten 144, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneegans, E., Haarscher, A., Lutz, A., Levy-Silagy, J. & Schmittbuhl, J. (1966). Contribution à l'étude de Bifidibacterium bifidum. Essais d'implantation chez le nourrisson sain et chez le porteur d'Escherichia coli pathogènes. Annales de Pédiatrie 13, 457.Google Scholar
Svirsky-Gross, S. (1958). Pathogenic strains of coli (O111) among prematures and the use of human milk in controlling the outbreak of diarrhoea. Annales Paediatrici (Basel) 190, 109.Google Scholar
Tassovatz, B. & Kotsitch, A. (1961). Le lait de femme et son action de protection contre les infections intestinales chez le nouveau-né. Annales de Pédiatrie 8, 285.Google Scholar
Tassovatz, B. (1964). L'entéro-colite aiguë bactérienne chez le nourisson. Essai de traitement par le Baciile bifidus. Annales de Pédiatrie 11, 291Google Scholar
Tissier, H. (1899). La réaction chromophile d'escherich et le Bacterium coli. Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Société de Biologie 51, 943.Google Scholar
Tissier, H. (1905). Répartition des microbes dans l'intestin du nourrisson. Annales de I'lnstitut Pasteur 19, 109.Google Scholar
Tissier, H. (1906). Traitement des infections intestinales par la méthode de transformation de la flore bactérienne de l'intestin. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de la Société de Biologie 60, 359.Google Scholar
Wiel-Korstanje, J. A. A. & Winkler, K. C. (1970). A medium for differential count of the anaerobic flora in human faeces. Applied Microbiology 20, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, A. T., Bullen, C. L., Williams, K., Fagg, C. G., Bourne, A. & Vignon, M. (1973). Breast milk substitute: A bacteriological study. British Medical Journal iv, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyeth, J. & Brother, Ltd. (1970). Wyeth Technical Booklet on SMA, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire.Google Scholar