Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T17:52:22.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A hospital outbreak of typhoid fever. Bacteriological and serological investigations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. C. Jones
A. C. Jones
Affiliation:
From the Public Health Laboratory, Royal Salop Infirmary, Shrewsbury
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. An account is given of the finding of 19 symptomless excreters of Salm. typhi and of 15 incubating cases (‘precocious carriers’) in the course of repeated examination of the faeces of 435 staff and patients at the hospital.

2. In a comparison of the frequency of isolation of Salm. typhi from the faeces it was found that the the selenite F enrichment method was more efficient than enrichement in Kauffmann 's tetrathionate broth, and that both methods were superior to direct plating on desoxycholate citrate agar.

3. Examination of sera from cases of typhoid fever showed that, in some cases, H- and O-agglutinin titres which would normally be regarded as ‘diagnostic’ may be reached well within the first week of illness.

4. Measures are described which were taken to exclude connexion between this outbreak and (a) a chronic carrier found during investigation of the hospital milk supply, and (b) the incidence of typhoid fever at another hospital.

5. A case of typhoid fever at Shrewsbury is described which was probably infected by an abortive missed case. Attempts to make a retrospective bacteriological or serological diagnosis of the latter were unsuccessful.

6. An account is given of the use of the sewage-pad method in an attempt to trace the source of infection in the case of a sewer worker who developed typhoid fever 14 months after the main epidemic and was probably infected by an intermittent carrier at the hospital.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 49 , Issue 2-3 , June 1951 , pp. 335 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

References

REFERENCES

Bradley, W. H., Evans, L. W. & Taylor, I. (1951). J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 324.Google Scholar
Conradi, H. (1907). Klin. Jb. 17, 297.Google Scholar
Craigie, J. & Yen, O. H. (1938). Canad. Publ. Hlth J. 29, 448, 484.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1924). J. Immunol. 9, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1930). Lancet, 1, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1938). Lancet, 2, 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. & Anderson, E. S. (1951). J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, R. M. (1944). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth & Emery. Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv., Lond., 3, 103–4.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. & Allison, V. D. (1945). Mon Bull. Minist. Hlth & Emery. Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv., Lond., 4, 12–19.Google Scholar
Klinger, P. (1909). Arb. ReichgesundhAmt. 30, 584.Google Scholar
Knox, R., Gell, P. H. G. & Pollock, M. R. (1943). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledingham, J. C. G. & Arkwright, J. A. (1912). The Carrier Problem in Infectious Diseases. London.Google Scholar
Lendon, N. C. & Mackenzie, R. D. (1951). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth & Emery. Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv., Lond., 10, 25.Google Scholar
Mayer, G. (1910). Zbl. Bakt. 53, 234.Google Scholar
MINISTRY OF HEALTH (1945). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth & Emery. Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv., Lond., 4, 224.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1948). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth& Emery. Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv., Lond., 7, 241.Google Scholar
Prigge, R. (1909). Klin. Jb. 22, 245.Google Scholar
Scott, W. M. (1941). Lancet, 1, 389.Google Scholar
Semple, D. & Greig, E. D. W. (1908). Sci. Mem. med. Sanit. Dep. India, no. 32.Google Scholar
Tsuzuki, J. (1910). Arch. Schiffs- u. Tropenhyg. 14, 147.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1938). j. Hyg., Camb., 38, no. 4, 504.Google Scholar