Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:12:50.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The isolation of salmonellas from British pork sausages and sausage meat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Diane Roberts
Affiliation:
Food Hygiene Laboratory
Karen Boag
Affiliation:
Food Hygiene Laboratory
Mary L. M. Hall
Affiliation:
Salmonella and Shigella Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Christine R. Shipp
Affiliation:
Salmonella and Shigella Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Between 1969 and 1974, 1467 packets (3309 samples) of pork sausages and sausage meat produced by two large and two medium sized manufacturers and several local butchers were examined for the presence of salmonellas. Of these, 435 packets (786 samples) were found to contain salmonellas, but there was a wide variation in the isolation rates according to the producer. The salmonella incidence in samples from several small and two medium sized producers was low (0–11%) while the results from the two large producers investigated showed a striking difference, the rate of salmonella contamination in the product of one was low (about 2%) and in that of the other consistently high (40–60%).

A comparison of liquid enrichment media, incubation temperatures and selective agar media was also carried out to determine the most efficient combination for the isolation of salmonellas from minced meat products. The results showed that (a) incubation of enrichment cultures at 43° C. yielded a consistently greater number of salmonella isolations than at 37° C., regardless of plating medium, (b) tetrathionate broth A (Rolfe) was superior to selenite broth as an enrichment medium at both 37 and 43° C. and (c) brilliant green agar gave better results than deoxycholate citrate sucrose agar and bismuth sulphite agar as a selective medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Bevan Jones, H., Farkas, G., Ghosh, A. C. & Hobbs, B. C. (1964). Salmonella brandenburg: an epidemiological study. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 23, 162.Google Scholar
Burns, C., Mair, N. S. & Hooper, W. L. (1965). An outbreak of Salmonella brandenburg infection caused by infected pork products. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 24, 9.Google ScholarPubMed
Buxton, A. (1957). In: Salmonellosis in animals. Review series No. 5 of the Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Health. Farnham Royal, Bucks, England. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Cowan, S. T. & Steel, K. J. (1970). Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1968). Comparative studies on Salmonella – isolation in eight European laboratories. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 487.Google ScholarPubMed
Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1969). Salmonella – isolation in nine European laboratories using a standardized technique. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 41, 297.Google ScholarPubMed
Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1970). Salmonella in mesenteric and portal lymph nodes and faeces from normal slaughter pigs. Zentralblatt für Veterinarmedizin, Reihe B 17, 875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, M. M., Lowery, W. D. & Hardy, A. V. (1954). Salmonella in fresh and smoked pork sausage. Journal of Infectious Diseases 95, 232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, M. M., Smith, W. V., Mcelrath, H. B. & Hardy, A. V. (1954). Salmonella in swine, cattle and the environment of abattoirs. Journal of Infectious Diseases 95, 236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967). The examination of samples infected with multiple salmonella serotypes. Journal of Hygiene 65, 423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1968). Elevated temperature incubation of enrichment for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. Journal of Hygiene 66, 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. (1961). Public health significance of salmonella carriers in livestock and birds. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 24, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, M. (1942). The isolation of intestinal pathogens by selective media. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 54, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, R., Gell, P. G. H. & Pollock, M. R. (1943). The selective action of tetrathionate in bacteriological media. Journal of Hygiene 43, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffmann, F. (1935). Weitere Erfahrungen mit dem kombinierten Anreicherungsverfahren fur Salmonellabacillen. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten 117, 26.Google Scholar
Liefson, E. (1935). New culture media based on sodium deoxycholate for the isolation of intestinal pathogens and for the enumeration of colon bacilli in milk and water. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 40, 58.Google Scholar
Liefson, E. (1936). New selenite enrichment media for the isolation of typhoid and paratyphoid (Salmonella) bacilli. American Journal of Hygiene 24, 423.Google Scholar
MacConkey, A. T. (1908). Bile salt media and their advantages in some bacteriological examinations. Journal of Hygiene 8, 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, G. K. & Dunn, C. G. (1970). Influence of incubation temperature and sodium heptadecyl sulphate (Tergitol No. 7) on the isolation of salmonellae from pork sausage. Applied Microbiology 20, 192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phls Working Group Skovgaard, N. & Nielsen, B. B. (1972). Salmonellas in pigs and animal feedingstuffs in the United Kingdom and in Denmark. Journal of Hygiene 70, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report (1947). The bacteriology of spray-dried egg, with particular reference to food poisoning. Special Report Series, Medical Research Council. No. 260.Google Scholar
Report (1955). Salmonella in carcass meat for human consumption. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 14, 132.Google Scholar
Rolfe, V. (1946). A note on the preparation of tetrathionate broth. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Emergency Public Health Laboratory Service 5, 158.Google ScholarPubMed
Savage, W. G. (1932). Some problems of Salmonella food poisoning. Journal of Preventive Medicine 6, 425.Google Scholar
Scott, W. M. (1940). Salmonellas in healthy pigs at slaughter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 33, 366.Google Scholar
Smith, H. V. (1959). The isolation of salmonellae from the mesenteric lymph nodes and faeces of pigs, cattle, sheep, dogs and cats and from other organs of poultry. Journal of Hygiene 57, 266.Google Scholar
Surkiewicz, B. F., Johnston, R. W., Elliott, R. P. & Simmons, E. R. (1972). Bacteriological survey of fresh pork sausages produced at establishments under federal inspection. Applied Microbiology 23, 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Oye, E. (Ed.) (1964). The World Problem of Salmonellosis. The Hague: Dr W. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. A. & Carpenter, J. A. (1969). Incidence of salmonellae in meat and meat products. Applied Microbiology 17, 899.Google Scholar
Williams, E. F. & Spencer, R. (1973). Abattoir practices and their effect on the incidence of salmonellae in meat. In The Microbiological Safety of Food, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Food Microbiology, Reading, Sept. (ed. Hobbs Betty, C. & Christian, J. H. B.). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. Jr. & Newell, K. W. (1970). Salmonella excretion in joy-riding pigs. American Journal of Public Health 60, 926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed