Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T10:11:19.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micropolyspora faeni and farmer's lung disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. M. Fletcher  and
C. J. M. Rondle
S. M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, and Mycological Reference Laboratory of the Public Health Laboratory Service, both at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, W.C. 1
C. J. M. Rondle
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, and Mycological Reference Laboratory of the Public Health Laboratory Service, both at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, W.C. 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several methods were used to obtain serologically active materials from cultures of Micropolyspora faeni. From the results of immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis tests on these materials it is suggested that preparations for the laboratory diagnosis of farmer's lung disease (FLD) should contain concentrated culture supernatant (CS) and extracts of mycelium obtained by ultrasonic treatment (MU). Although CS and MU have many serological activities in common they also possess activities unique to each.

Extraction of mycelium with trichloracetic acid, boiling water or methanol yielded a product which gave simple patterns in immunodiffusion tests. The products contained little protein but were rich in carbohydrates, particularly arabinose, galactose and glucosamine. A similar material was obtained from a cell-wall preparation by treatment with lysozyme. Antibodies to the serologically active substances in these materials occurred more frequently in sera of patients with FLD than antibodies to any other M. faeni antigen.

Attempts to obtain serologically active materials from spores were unsuccessful. Moreover antibodies to M. faeni could not be removed from patients' sera by absorption with partially purified spore preparations. It is suggested that the hypersensitivity in FLD arises from exposure to mycelial antigens.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

References

REFERENCES

Fletcher, S. M., Rondle, C. J. M. & Murray, I. G. (1970). The extracellular antigens of Micropolyspora faeni: their significance in farmer's lung disease. Journal of Hygiene 68, 401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, J. E. (1968). Rapid and sensitive precipitm test for the diagnosis of farmer's lung using immuno-osmophoresis. Journal of Clinical Pathology 21, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, P. A. & Pepys, J. (1965). Fog fever. Precipitm (FLH) reactions to mouldy hay, Veterinary Record 77, 464.Google ScholarPubMed
Jermyn, M. A. & Isherwood, F. A. (1949). Improved separation of sugars on the paper partition chromatogram. Biochemical Journal 44, 402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, M., Starmann, M. A., Rankin, J. & Dickie, H. A. (1964). Antigens in mouldy hay as the cause of farmer's lung. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 113, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laberge, D. E. & Stahmann, M. A. (1966). Antigens from Thermopolyspora polyspora involved in farmer's lung. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 121, 463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacey, J. & Lacey, M. E. (1964). Spore concentrations in the air of farm buildings. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 47, 547.Google Scholar
Lowry, C. H., Rosebrougr, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randalj, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, S. M. (1948). Filter paper partition chromatography of sugars. Biochemical Journal 42, 238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepys, J., Jenkins, P. A., Fenstenstetr, G. N., Gregory, P. H., Lacey, M. E. & Skinner, F. A. (1963). Farmer's lung. Thermophilic actinomycetes as a source of ‘Farmer’s Lung Hay' antigen. Lancet ii, 607.Google Scholar
Pepys, J. & Jenkins, P. A. (1965). Precipitin (FLH) test in farmer's lung. Thorax 20, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Screidegger, J. J. (1955). Une micro-méthode de l'irnmuno-électrophor`se. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 7, 103.Google Scholar
Trevelyan, W. E., Proctor, D. P. & Harrison, J. S. (1950). Detection of sugars on paper chromatograms. Nature, London 166, 444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walbaum, S., Biguet, J. & Trar Van Ky, P. (1969). Structure antigénique de Thermopolyspoira polyspora. Répercussions pratiques sur le diagnostic du ‘poumon du fermier’. Annales di l'institut Pasteur 117, 673.Google Scholar
Wenzel, F. J., Emanuel, D. A., Lawton, B. R. & Magnin, G. E. (1964). Isolation of the causative agent of ‘farmer's lung’. Annals of Allergy 22, 533.Google ScholarPubMed