Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T20:06:32.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular subtyping by genome and plasmid analysis of Campylobacter jejuni serogroups O1 and O2 (Penner) from sporadic and outbreak cases of human diarrhoea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Fayos ,
R. J. Owen ,
J. Hernandez ,
C. Jones  and
A. Lastovica
A. Fayos
Affiliation:
Departamento Biotecnologia, Universidad Politecnica, Valencia, Spain
R. J. Owen*
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK
J. Hernandez
Affiliation:
Departamento Biotecnologia, Universidad Politecnica, Valencia, Spain
C. Jones
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK
A. Lastovica
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ribosomal RNA gene patterns, randomly amplified polymorphic genomic DNA (RAPD) profiles and plasmid profiles were used to discriminate between 28 strains of Campylobacter jejuni serogroups O1 and O2 (Penner). Most isolates were biotype I (Lior). The strains were representative isolates from a UK school outbreak of enteritis (7 cases) and from 21 sporadic human cases of enteritis in 4 countries. The molecular techniques discriminated to various degrees between strains in each of the serogroups. The outbreak strains were homogeneous in most molecular features but a variety of types was detected amongst the isolates from the sporadic cases. Five groups of two or more strains with identical ribopatterns were identified and within each, strains from different patients were homogenous with respect to serogroup. RAPD profile typing based on numerical analysis generally matched ribotyping. Plasmid profiling overall gave least discrimination but was useful in separating some strains similar in other features. We concluded that optimal discrimination of C. jejuni could best be achieved using a combination of phenotypic and genotypic properties. Hae III ribotyping was the single most discriminatory and reproducible technique investigated. Several strains of C. jejuni from sporadic infections had similar molecular profiles which have potential for general typing purposes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , December 1993 , pp. 415 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

1.Fricker, CR, Park, RWA. A two-year study of the distribution of ‘thermophilic’ campylobacters in human, environmental and food samples from the Reading area with particular reference to toxin production and heat-stable serotype. J Appl Microbiol 1989; 66: 477–90.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Griffiths, PL, Park, RWA, Campylobacters associated with human diarrhoeal disease. J Appl Bacteriol 1990; 69: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Park, RWA, Griffiths, PL, Moreno, GS. Sources and survival of Campylobacters: relevance to enteritis and the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol Symp Suppl 1991; 70: 978–1068.Google Scholar
4.Skirrow, MB. A demographic survey of campylobacter, salmonella and shigella infections in England. Epidemiol Infect 1987; 99: 647–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Butzler, JP, Oosterom, J. Campylobacter: pathogenicity and significance in foods. Int J Fd Microbiol 1991; 12: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cover, TL, Blaser, MJ. The pathobiology of Campylobacter infections in humans. Ann Rev Med 1989; 40: 269–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Healing, TD, Greenwood, MH, Pearson, AD. Campylobacters and enteritis. Rev Med Microbiol 1992; 3: 159–67.Google Scholar
8.Penner, JL. The genus Campylobacter: a decade of progress. Clin Microbiol Rev 1988; 1: 157–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Skirrow, MB. Campylobacter, Helicobacter and other motile curved gram-negative rods. In: Parker, MT, Duerden, BI, eds. Topley & Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology, immunology, 8th ed, vol 2, Systematic bacteriology. London: Edward Arnold, 1992: 530–49.Google Scholar
10.Lior, H. New extended biotyping scheme for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter laridis. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20: 636–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Penner, JL, Hennessy, JN. Passive haemagglutination technique for serotyping Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on the basis of soluble heat stable antigens. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12: 732–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Lior, H, Woodward, DL, Edgar, JA, Laroche, LJ, Gill, P. Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by slide agglutination based on heat-labile antigenic factors. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 761–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Grajewski, BA, Kusek, JW, Gelfand, HM. Development of a bacteriophage typing system for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Patton, CM, Wachsmuth, IK, Evins, GM, et al. Evaluation of 10 methods to distinguish epidemic-associated Campylobacter strains. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 680–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Salama, SM, Bolton, FJ, Hutchinson, DN. Application of a new phage typing scheme to campylobacters isolated during outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 104: 405–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Bruce, D, Hookey, JV, Waitkins, SA. Numerical classification of campylobacters by DNA-restriction endonuclease analysis. Zbl Bacteriol Mikrobiol Hyg Ser A 1988; 269: 284–97.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Hernandez, J, Owen, RJ, Costas, M, Lastovica, A. DNA-DNA hybridization and analysis of restriction endonuclease and rRNA gene patterns of atypical (catalase- weak/negative) Campylobacter jejuni from paediatric blood and faecal cultures. J Appl Bacteriol 1991; 70: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Owen, RJ, Beck, A. Evaluation of three procedures using a laser densitometer and microcomputer for estimating molecular sizes of restriction endonuclease digest fragments and application to Campylobacter jejuni chromosomal DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol 1987; 4: 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Owen, RJ, Costas, M, Dawson, C. Application of different chromosomal DNA restriction digest fingerprints to specific and subspecific identification of Campylobacter isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 2338–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Yan, W, Chang, W, Taylor, DE. Pulse field gel electrophoresis of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genomic DNA and its epidemiological application. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 1068–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Fayos, A, Owen, RJ, Desai, M, Hernandez, J. Ribosomal RNA gene restriction fragment diversity amongst Lior biotypes and Penner serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992; 95: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Geilhausen, B, Mauff, G, Vlaes, L, Goossens, H, Butzler, JP. Restriction fragment length polymorphism for identification of Campylobacter jejuni isolates. Zbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg Ser A 1990; 274: 366–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Hernandez, J, Fayos, A, Owen, RJ. Biotypes and DNA ribopatterns of thermophilic campylobacters from faeces and seawater in Eastern Spain. Lett Appl Microbiol 1991; 13: 207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Owen, RJ, Hernandez, J, Bolton, F. DNA restriction digest ribosomal RNA gene patterns of Campylobacter jejuni: a comparison with bio-, sero- and bacteriophage-types of United Kingdom outbreak strains. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105: 265–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Tenover, FC, Williams, S, Gordon, KP, Harris, N, Norlan, C, Plorde, . Utility of plasmid fingerprinting for epidemiological studies of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Infect Dis 1984; 149: 279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Mazurier, S, van de Giessen, A, Heuvelman, CJ, Wernan, K. RAPD analysis of Campylobacter isolates: DNA fingerprinting without the need to purify DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol 1992; 14: 260–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Owen, RJ, Hernandez, J. Ribotyping and arbitrary primer PCR-fingerprinting of campylobacters. In: Sussman, M, ed. Application of new techniques in food beverage microbiology. SAB Technical Ser. 31. London: Academic Press, 1993. In press.Google Scholar
28.Lastovica, AJ, Le, Roux E, Congi, RV, Penner, JL. Distribution of sero-biotypes of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli isolated from paediatric patients. J Med Microbiol 1986; 21: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Benjamin, J, Leaper, S, Owen, RJ, Skirrow, MB. Description of Campylobacter laridis, a new species comprising the nalidixic acid resistant thermophilic Campylobacter (NARTC) Group. Curr Microbiol 1983; 8: 231–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Pitcher, DG, Saunders, NA, Owen, RJ. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 1989; 8: 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Maniatis, T, Fritsch, EF, Sambrook, J. Molecular cloning – a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1982.Google Scholar
32.Pitcher, DG, Owen, RJ, Dyal, P, Beck, A. Synthesis of a biotinylated DNA probe to detect ribosomal RNA cistrons in Providencia stuartii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 48: 283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Sneath, PHA, Sokal, RR. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman Co, 1973.Google Scholar
34.Costas, M. Numerical analysis of sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic protein patterns for the classification, identification and typing of medically important bacteria. Electrophoresis 1990; 11: 382–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Kado, CI, Liu, S-T. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J Bacteriol 1981; 145: 1365–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Kwok, S, Higuchi, R. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature (London) 1989; 339: 237–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Wilson, K. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In: Ausubel, FM, Brent, R, Kingston, RE, Moore, DD, Smith, JA, Seidman, JG, Struhl, K, eds. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
38.Fraser, ADE, Brooks, BW, Garcia, MM, Lior, H. Molecular discrimination of Campylobacter coli serogroup 20 biotype I (Lior) strains. Vet Microbiol 1992; 30: 267–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Owen, RJ. Chromosomal DNA fingerprinting – a new method of species and strain identification applicable to microbial pathogens. J Med Microbiol 1989; 30: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Lind, L, Sjogren, E, Welinder-Olsson, C, Kaijser, B. Plasmids and serogroups in Campylobacter jejuni. APMIS 1989; 97: 11097–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed