Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T18:18:38.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple plating from enrichment media as an aid to salmonella isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. H. Price
Affiliation:
Regional Public Health Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF4 4XW
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Faeces samples enriched for salmonellas in selenite F broth incubated at 43°C were subcultured to brilliant green MacConkey agar after 6 h. Four platings were made. As a control technique, each sample was enriched in selenite F incubated at 37°C for 24 h and subcultured once to brilliant green MacConkey agar. Of the specimens plated at 6 h, out of a total of 25 positive samples, 6 required more than a single subculture to reveal the presence of salmonellas. Twenty-four positive isolations were made from the selenite broths incubated at 37°C for 24 h and subcultured once only. All faecal samples positive by enrichment were also positive by direct plating. Nine samples seeded by 6 h produced only 1–2 salmonella colonies per plate. Convalescent specimens are, therefore, unlikely to be efficiently diagnosed by early subculture even if it is combined with multiple plating.

River Taff samples, after pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water, were enriched in Rappaport's medium at 37°C for 6 h. Subcultures were made to four plates of brilliant green MacConkey agar. A control subculture was made at 24 h to a single plate of brilliant green MacConkey. Although multiple subculture at 6 h improved salmonella isolation, the method was not as efficient as a single plating from the same enrichment culture at 24 h. There was no evidence that subculture at 6 h combined with multiple plating had a value either for faecal examination or for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage-polluted natural water.

Samples of other natural waters submitted routinely by Environmental Health Officers were pre-enriched in buffered peptone water before subculture to Rappa port's medium. The enrichment cultures were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and duplicate platings were made to brilliant green MacConkey agar. By double plating at 24 h, a gain of 16% in salmonella recovery was made. This compares favourably with the gain obtained by subculture from Rappaport after 24 and 48 h incubation. It also saves 24 h in examination time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1975). Meat and meatproducts: detection of Salmonellae (reference method) International Standard ISO 3565–1975 (E) Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. M. S. (1961). Rapid isolation of salmonellae from faeces. Journal of Clinical Pathology 14, 397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drigalski, von K. W. & Conradi, H. (1902). Über em Verfahren zum Nachweis der Typhus bazillen. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten, Medizinische Microbiologie. Immunologie und Virologie 39, 293.Google Scholar
Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1968). Comparative studies on Salmonella-isolation in eight European laboratories. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 487.Google ScholarPubMed
George, T. C. R., Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). The measurement of the duration of infection in paratyphoid fever. Journal of Hygiene 51, 532.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. (1956). Choice of a selective medium for the routine isolation of members of the salmonella group. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 15, 118.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, H. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1982 a). Influence of multiple plating from fluid media on salmonella isolation from animal feeding stuffs. Journal of Hygiene 88, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, H. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1982 b). Salmonella isolation and identification techniques alternative to the standard method. In Society for Applied Bacteriology Technical Series no. 17. Isolation and Identification Methods for Food Poisoning Organisms (ed. Corry, Roberts and Skinner). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H. & Xirouchaki, , Evanoelia, (1979). Comparison of selenite F, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and Rappaport's medium for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage-polluted natural water using a pre-enrichment technique. Journal of Hygiene 83, 451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149.Google ScholarPubMed
Kröger, E. (1951). Zur Bakterienausscheidung bei Typhus-Paratyphus Keimtragern. Archiv für Hygiene und Bakteriologie 135, 215.Google Scholar
Liefson, E. (1936). New selenite enrichment media for the isolation of typhoid and paratyphoid (salmonella) bacilli. American Journal of Hygiene 24, 423.Google Scholar
Loeffler, F. (1906). Der kulturelle Nachweiss der Typhusbazillen in Faeces, Erde und Wasser mit Hilfe des Malaehitgrüns. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 32, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. (1950). The detection of typhoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 9, 72.Google Scholar
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1965). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassiliadis, P., Trichopoijlos, D., Papadakis, J. & Politi, G. (1970). Salmonella isolations in abattoirs in Greece. Journal of Hygiene 68, 601.Google ScholarPubMed