Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T13:38:07.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new approach to development of live vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. A. Smorodintsev
Affiliation:
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences U.S.S.R., State Research Institute of Influenza, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
A. V. Dubov
Affiliation:
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences U.S.S.R., State Research Institute of Influenza, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
V. I. Ilyenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences U.S.S.R., State Research Institute of Influenza, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
V. G. Platonov
Affiliation:
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences U.S.S.R., State Research Institute of Influenza, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Investigations of the biological properties of tick-borne encephalitis viruses immediately after isolation from naturally infected Ixodes persulcatus from Western Siberia has revealed their different pathogenicity for monkeys and mice. Strains highly pathogenic for mice on extraneural inoculation and for rhesus monkeys on intracerebral inoculation have been isolated, but also strains with a low extraneural pathogenicity for mice and a complete non-pathogenicity or a mild pathogenicity for monkeys on intracerebral inoculation.

The viruses have been classified into three main groups by their virulence for mice and monkeys, and their ability to grow in tissue culture at 40° C. and the findings are summarized in Table 6. Group I included viruses highly virulent for mice by any route of inoculation, which caused fatal paralytic disease in monkeys, and which grew well in chick embryo culture at 40° C.

Group II strains also had a high virulence for mice, but in monkeys caused milder disease with a peculiar clinical course indicative of primary damage to the cerebellum. About half of the infected monkeys recovered completely or with mild sequelae (ataxia, pareses of the limbs). This group grew moderately well in chick embryo cultures at 40° C. Groups I and III differed essentially in their virulence for mice by subcutaneous inoculation, and virulence for monkeys decreased distinctly with transition from group I to group III. Group III strains showed a lower reproduction rate at 40° C. In chick embryo culture than group I. Groups I and II showed good correlation between extraneural pathogenicity for mice, pathogenicity for monkeys by IC inoculation, and growth rate in chick embryo cultures at 40° C.

Group I strains were isolated chiefly from foci with a high TBE morbidity and the strains of groups II and III in foci with sporadic cases. It is, however, highly probable that in any tick-borne encephalitis focus several variant strains of differing virulence exist.

Recent experience of vaccinating volunteers with naturally attenuated group III strains suggests that safe and effective live vaccines can be developed against tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccines against many other arbovirus diseases can probably also be derived from naturally occurring strains of virus isolated from arthropods in areas of low disease but high infection rate. This approach looks more promising than the usual approach of attempting to develop attenuated strains from highly virulent strains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

Smith, C. E. G. (1956). A virus resembling Russian spring-summer encephalitis virus from an ixodid tick in Malaya. Nature, Lond. 178, 581–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smorodintsev, A. A. & Ilyenko, V. I. (1961). Results of laboratory and epidemiological study of vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Proc. Symp.: Biology of Viruses of the Tick-borne Encephalitis Complex (ed. H. Libikova), pp. 332–43.Google Scholar
Smorodintsev, A. A., Kagan, N. W., Levkovitch, E. N. & Dankovsky, N. L. (1941). Experimenteller und epidemiologischer Beitrag zur activen Immunisierung gegen die Frühling-Sommer-Zechen-Encephalitis. Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 2, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smorodintsev, A. A., Levkovitch, E. N. & Dankovsky, N. L. (1940). Experience in preventing spring-summer encephalitis in the endemic areas with killed virus vaccine. Arch. biol. Sci. 59, 92104. (In Russian.)Google Scholar