Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:41:30.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A novel method of oral fluid collection to monitor immunity to common viral infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2004

M. C. MORRIS-CUNNINGTON
Affiliation:
Immunisation Division, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC), Health Protection Agency (formerly Public Health Laboratory Service) Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
W. J. EDMUNDS
Affiliation:
Immunisation Division, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC), Health Protection Agency (formerly Public Health Laboratory Service)
E. MILLER
Affiliation:
Immunisation Division, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC), Health Protection Agency (formerly Public Health Laboratory Service)
D. W. G. BROWN
Affiliation:
Enteric, Neurological and Respiratory Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Serological surveys among representative population samples have proved rare given their reliance on invasive sample collection. We therefore completed the first population-based postal survey of immunity in England and Wales using new oral fluid technology. This paper examines the feasibility of this new methodological approach. Nearly 5500 oral fluid samples were collected, with individual demographic and social data via a questionnaire, from persons under 45 years of age recruited through general practices. Instructions were accurately followed with only 1% of samples returned without risk-factor data. The overall response rate was 40%. Response was independently associated with age, sex and location. Response was highest in children aged 5–14 years, adult females and in rural locations. This approach allowed the successful collection of comprehensive individual risk data, but response rates in adults must be improved if oral fluid surveys are to routinely complement serological surveillance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press