Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T15:38:25.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Bacteriology of an Epidemic of Diphtheria in a School, with Special Reference to the Virulence of the Organisms which were Isolated from the Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Arkwright
J. A. Arkwright
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

(1) A localised epidemic of diphtheria of a clinically mild type (both as regards local and general symptoms) was associated with the prevalence in the fauces of patients and contacts of strains of B. diphtheriae of low pathogenicity for animals; 35% of these strains possessed moderate virulence for guinea-pigs, 30% low virulence and 35% were non-virulent.

(2) Prolonged nasal discharge after moderately severe diphtheria was in one case associated with a strain of B. diphtheriae which was non-virulent for guinea-pigs.

(3) Acid production in various carbohydrate media proved a valuable means of differentiating diphtheria-like bacilli, but the exact composition of the medium is of importance. Peptone water appears to be especially suitable for the basis as being least liable to variation.

(4) The agglutination test gave a fairly uniform result with most of the strains of virulent B. diphtheriae, but three virulent strains did not give a decided positive reaction to this test. Of the non-virulent strains half gave a slight, the remainder a negative result.

Bacillus pseudo-diphtheriae (Hofmann) and certain acid producing diphtheroids gave no reaction.

(5) B. fusiformis and spirochaetes occurred in large numbers on the fauces in this epidemic of diphtheria, in association with the B. diphtheriae.

(6) After all the boys had received prophylactic infections of antitoxin and after the carriers had been isolated the epidemic promptly ceased.

I have to thank Lieut.-Col. Sir Joseph Fayrer, Medical Officer of the Duke of York's School, who was at the time Acting Commandant, for his permission to publish this account.

I am very much indebted to Dr Boycott and Dr Marshall for the very large amount of help which they gave me, and to Dr Dean for his assistance throughout the investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1908 , pp. 48 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

References

Cobbett, L. (x. 1901). Observations on the recurrence of Diphtheria in Cambridge in the spring of 1901. Journ. of Hygiene, I. p. 485.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. H. (1902). Report on Bacillus diphtheriae and micro-organisms liable to be confounded therewith. 31st Annual Report of Local Government Board, 1901–2, p. 418.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1904). A study of the Virulence of the Diphtheria bacilli isolated from 113 persons, and of 11 species of Diphtheria-like organisms, together with the measures taken to check an outbreak of Diphtheria at Cambridge, 1903. Journ. of Hygiene, IV. p. 99.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1906). The action of Diphtheria and Diphtheria-like bacilli on various sugars and carbohydrates. Journ. of Hygiene, VI. p. 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, A. (1904). The differentiation of Bacillus diphtheriae, B. xerosis, and B. pseudo-diphtheriae by fermentation tests in Serum-water media of Hiss. Journ. of Med. Research, XII. p. 475.Google Scholar
Leiner, K. (1906). Ueber anaeroben Bakterien bei Diphtherie. Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. Abt. I. Orig. XLIII. p. 7.Google Scholar
Lubowski, R. (1900). Ueber einen atoxischen u. avirulenten Diphtheriestamm und über die Agglutination der Diphtheriebacillen. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, XXXV. p. 87.Google Scholar
Pennington, M. E. (1907). The Virulence of Diphtheria organisms in the throats of well school children and Diphtheria convalescents. Journ. of Infect. Dis. IV. p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J. (1906). History of a Diphtheria outbreak complicated with Vincent's Angina at the Lambeth Parochial Schools, West Norwood, May to July 1905. Practitioner, LXXVII. p. 372.Google Scholar
Richmond, B. A. and Salter, A. (1898). The ÆEtiological significance of the Diphtheria bacillus and its variants. Guy's Hospital Reports, LIII. p. 55.Google Scholar
Smith, T. and Walker, E. L. (1896). Comparative Study of 42 cultures of Diphtheria bacilli and four cultures of Pseudo-diphtheria bacilli from different localities in Massachusetts. 28th Ann. Rep. of the State Board of Health of Mass., p. 649.Google Scholar
Thomas, (1905). Reffered to by Kerr. Rep. of Medical Officer (Education) to the London Country Council for the year ended 31 March 1905, p. 26.Google Scholar
Ustvedt, Y. (1906). Die Diphtherieprophylaxe und die Bedeutung der gesunden Bacillenträger für die Verbreitung der Krankheit. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infektionskr. LIV. p. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar