Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T18:13:31.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The occurrence of Weil's disease among miners in the west of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. D. Stuart
Affiliation:
From the Bacteriology Department, University of Glasgow, at the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Eleven cases of Weil's disease in miners from the west of Scotland have been encountered in the years 1937 and 1938. Only five showed jaundice.

Ten cases of infection previous to this period have been determined by serological means. Eight were jaundiced.

Information pointing to the occurrence of about eighteen more cases has been obtained from the Lanark public health authorities and from patients' statements.

The occurence of leptospiral infection appears limited at the moment but is quite serious in certain areas.

All available evidence points to the infectious being due to one specific strain of Leptospira.

I should like to thank the Physicians and Surgeons of the Royal Infirmary for permission to obtain sera from miners in their wards, and in particular Prof. A. W. Harrington, Dr J. C. Middleton and Dr J. N. Cruickshank for clinical details of cases. In addition, I would express my indebtedness to Dr J. M. Lang, Medical Officer of Health, Lanark, for the opportunity to investigate suspected cases, past and present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

References

REFERENCES

Alston, J. M. & Brown, H. C. (1937). Proc. R. Soc. Med. 30, 741.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. (1927). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 113.Google Scholar
Coppinger, C. J. (1936). J. R. Army med. Cps, 66, 82.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. S. P., Campbell, R. M., Rae, H. J. & Smith, J. (1934). Brit. med. J. 2, 1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. S. P. & Smith, J. (1936). Quart. J. Med. 5, 263.Google Scholar
Gulland, G. L. & Buchanan, G. (1924). Brit. med. J. 1, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inada, R., Ido, Y., Hoki, R., Kaneko, R. & Ito, H. (1916). J. exp. Med. 23, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, J. C. & McFadzean, A. J. S. (1938). Glasg. med. J. 12, 173.Google Scholar
Schlossberger, H., Grillo, J. & Scheele, L. (1935). Klin. Wschr. 14, 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüffner, W. (1934). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (1924). Report M.O.H. Aberdeen, p. 56 (quoted by Smith, 1938).Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 34.Google Scholar
Smith, J. & Davidson, L. S. P. (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 36, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A. C. (1922). Amer. J. trop. Med. 2, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, W. G. A. & McKeon, J. A. (1935). Lancet, 2, 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, W. G. A. & McKeon, J. A. (1938 a). Lancet, 1, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, W. G. A. & McKeon, J. A. (1938 b). Newc. med. J. 18, 71.Google Scholar
Wani, H. (1933). Z. ImmunForsch. 79, 1.Google Scholar