Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident Due to planned maintenance there will be periods of time where the website may be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
In this Journal (vol. VII. p. 501) Mr J. A. Craw has recently published a very sharp criticism of my calculations based on experiments by Madsen and Walbum regarding the so-called Danysz Effect.
page 1 note 1 Madsen, and Arrhenius, (1906), Meddelanden Nobel Instit. vol. I. No. 3.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Danysz, (1902), Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, vol. XVI. p. 311.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Dungern, von (1904), Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Nos. 8 and 9.Google Scholar
page 1 note 4 Sachs, H (1904), Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. XXXVI. Abt. I. 251.Google Scholar
page 2 note 1 Schwab, , in Études de dynamique chimique, by van't Hoff, 1883.Google Scholar
page 5 note 1 Immunochemie, übers. v. Finkelstein (Akad. Verlagsgesellsch. Leipzig, 1907); Immuno-chemistry (The MacMillan Co., New York, 1907).
page 5 note 2 Freundlich, H (1907), Zeitschr. f. Chemie u. Industrie der Kolloide, I. 325.Google Scholar
page 6 note 1 Festskrift ved indvielsen af statens serum-institut, No. 3, Copenhagen, 1902.Google Scholar
page 7 note 1 Cf. Immunochemie, p. 19, English ed. p. 28.
page 7 note 2 Festskrift, No. 4, Copenhagen, 1902; Immunochemie, p. 16, English ed. p. 25.Google Scholar
page 8 note 1 Zeitschr. f. Elektrochemie, 13, 1907.Google Scholar
You have
Access
