Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:30:19.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the new clinical fashion in epidemiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. P. Vandenbroucke
J. P. Vandenbroucke
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The clinical application of the principles of epidemiological research has become fashionable. Three recent textbooks carry the words ‘Clinical Epidemiology’ in their titles (Feinstein, 1985; Sackett, Haynes & Tugwell, 1985; Weiss, 1986), and a venerable journal has recently changed its name to this effect (Feinstein & Spitzer, 1988). Deans of medical schools, Government Health Officials and editorialists pay tribute to the new science which is expected to steer the medical profession of the third millennium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 191 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

Ackerknecht, E. H. (1967). Medicine at the Paris Hospital 1794–1848. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. (1980). The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Michigan: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, J. D. & Colditz, G. A. (1983). Use of statistical analysis in the New England Journal of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 309, 709–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, A. R. (1985). Clinical Epidemiology. The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Feinstein, A. R. & Spitzer, W. O. (1988). Editorial: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: same wine, new label for the Journal of Chronic Diseases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 44, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1986). The Medical Dictator and Other Biographical Studies. London: the Keynes Press 73–88 (first edn 1936).Google Scholar
Lewis, TH. (1934). Clinical Science, Illustrated by Personal Experiences. London: Shaw and Sons.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, A. M. (Ed.) (1978). Times, Places and Persons. Aspects of the History of Epidemiology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, D. E. (1978). The greening of Epidemiology. Sanitary physicians and the London Epidemiological Society (1830–1870). Bulletins of the History of Medicine 52, 503–528.Google ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, J. (1919). The Future of Medicine. London: Frowde, Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1979). Advice to a Young Scientist. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pemberton, J. (1972). Will Pickles of Wensleydale. Newton Abbot: Country Book Club.Google Scholar
Pickles, W. N. (1983). Epidemiology in Country Practice. London: the Keynes Press.Google Scholar
Rahimtoola, S. H. (1987). Control of scientific research. In Cardiac Arrhythmics: Where to Go from Here? ed. Brugada, P.Wellens, H. J. J., pp. 689–98. Mount Kisco, NY: Future Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B. & Tugwell, P. (1985). Clinical Epidemiology, a Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Susser, M. (1985). Epidemiology in the United States after World War II: the evolution of technique. Epidemiologic Review 7, 147–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tröhler, U. (1978). Quantification in British medicine and surgery 1750–1830. with special reference to its introduction into therapeutics. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Weinstein, M. C. & Fineberg, H. V. (1980). Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Weiss, N. S. (1986). Clinical Epidemiology, the Study of the Outcome of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar