Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T19:08:57.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Relationship between Bacillus pestis and Bacillus pseudotuberculosis rodentium (Pfeiffer)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Alfred T. MacConkey
Alfred T. MacConkey
Affiliation:
Bacteriologist-in-charge, Serum Department, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

(1) Morphologically and culturally the Bacillus pseudotuberculosis rodentium (Pfeiffer) bears a strong resemblance to B. pestis.

(2) The filtrate from an autolysed agar culture of B. pseudotuberculosis rodentium (Pfeiffer) and a similar filtrate from a B. pestis culture both gave a precipitin reaction with pest serum.

(3) It has been found possible to immunise both guinea-pigs and rats against plague by means of inoculations of cultures of B. pseudotuberculosis rodentium (Pfeiffer), and this immunity lasted in many cases at least six months.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , June 1908 , pp. 335 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

References

Galli-Valerio, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I Orig., Vol. XXXIII. pp. 321–330.Google Scholar
MacConkey, (1905). Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. V. p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibayama, G. (1905). Centralbl. f. Bakt., I Orig., Vol. XXXVIII. pp. 482–491.Google Scholar
Vourloud, . (1907). Centralbl. f. Bakt., Vol. XLV. p. 194.Google Scholar
Zlatogoroff, (1904). Centralbl. f. Bakt., Vol. XXXVII. p. 513.Google Scholar