Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:22:22.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Varieties of Bacillus Coli associated with the House-fly (Musca Domestica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

William Nicoll
William Nicoll
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, London)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A study of the natural bacterial flora of the house-fly appears to be essential in forming a correct estimate of the part played by flies in transmitting pathogenic bacteria.

2. The house-fly may carry at least 27 varieties of Bacillus coli, by far the most frequent of which are B. coli communis and MacConkey's bacillus No. 71.

3. As far as can be judged from the character of these colon bacilli the house-fly derives its bacterial flora equally from excremental matter and from other sources.

4. Certain non-lactose fermenting bacilli appear to be capable of multiplying in the intestine of the house-fly. Of these Morgan's bacillus No. 1 is a not infrequent inhabitant of the fly's intestine and B. paratyphosus β has been found on two occasions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1911 , pp. 381 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

References

Faichnie, N. (1909a). Fly-borne enteric fever; the source of infection. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XIII. 580–584.Google Scholar
Faichnie, N. (1909b). Bacillus typhosus in flies. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XIII. 672–675.Google Scholar
Ficker, M.. (1903). Typhus und Fliegen. Arch. f. Hyg. XLVI. 274–283.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1909). Preliminary note on examination of flies for the presence of B. coli. Rep. to the L. G. B. on Publ. Health and Med. Subjects. New series No. 16, 9–13.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1910). Observations on the ways in which artifically infected flies (Musca domestica) carry and distribute pathogenic and other bacteria. Rep. to the L. G. B. on Publ. Health and Med. Subjects. New series No. 40, 1–41.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1911). Further observations on the ways in which artificially infected flies carry and distribute pathogenic and other bacteria. Rep. to the L. G. B. on Publ. Health and Med. Subjects. New series No. 53, 31–48.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1903). Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. 02. 28th.Google Scholar
Horrocks, W. H. (1903). The B. coli communis considered as an indicator of sewage contamination of water supplies. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, I. 362–376.Google Scholar
MacConkey, A. (1905). Lactose-fermenting bacteria in faeces. Journ. of Hyg. V. 333–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConkey, A. (1909). Further observations on the differentiation of lactose-fermenting bacilli, with special references to those of intestinal origin. Journ. of Hyg. IX. 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marpmann, G. (1884). Die Verbreitung von Spaltpilzen durch Fliegen. Arch. f. Hyg. II. 360–363.Google Scholar
Morgan, H.De, R., and Ledingham, J. C. G. (1909). The bacteriology of summer diarrhoea. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. II. Part II. 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar