Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:20:40.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pyocine typing as an epidemiological marker in Pseudomonas aeruginosa mastitis in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Ziv ,
Rose Mushin  and
J. R. Tagg
G. Ziv
Affiliation:
Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, Israel
Rose Mushin
Affiliation:
School of Microbiology, University of Melbourne, Australia
J. R. Tagg
Affiliation:
School of Microbiology, University of Melbourne, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pyocine typing was used for the characterization of 134 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from bovine mastitis. The scheme of Gillies & Govan (1966) was adopted with some modifications, and the procedure gave 89·6% typability. Pyocine type 1 strains were most commonly encountered and were followed in frequency by types 10 and 3. The introduction of two additional indicator strains allowed for division of these types into subtypes.

In spite of some limitations, discussed in the paper, the pyocine typing scheme proved to be useful in ‘marking’ P. aeruginosa strains and in following their association with bovine mastitis in various herds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 171 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Cherrington, V. A. & Gildow, E. M. (1931). Bovine mastitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 79, 803.Google Scholar
Cone, J. F. (1939). Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bovine mastitis. Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 141.Google Scholar
Curtis, P. E. (1969). Pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination of a warm water system used for pre-milking udder washing. Veterinary Record 84, 476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darrell, J. H. & Wahba, A. H. (1964). Pyocine typing of hospital strains of Pseudomonas pyocyanea. Journal of Clinical Pathology 17, 236.Google Scholar
Gillies, R. R. & Govan, J. R. W. (1966). Typing of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by pyocine production. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 91, 339.Google Scholar
Govan, J. R. W. & Gillies, R. R. (1969). Further studies in the pyocine typing of Pseudomonas pyocyanea. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2, 17.Google Scholar
Kruiningen van, H. J. (1963). Successful treatment of a herd outbreak of Pseudomonas mastitis. Cornell Veterinarian 53, 240.Google Scholar
Mastitis Sub-Committee of the Technical Development Committee (1965). Controlling bovine mastitis. Veterinary Record 77, 612.Google Scholar
Nurmi, E. V. & Koiranen, L. (1967). Bacteriological review of milk samples from clinical mastitis. Nordisk Veterinaermedicin 19, 36.Google Scholar
Pickens, E. M. M., Welsh, F. & Poelma, L. J. (1926). Pyocyaneus bacillosis and mastitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cornell Veterinarian 16, 186.Google Scholar
Plastridge, W. (1958). Bovine mastitis – a review. Journal of Dairy Science 41, 1141.Google Scholar
Redaelli, G. & Perini, G. (1960). Contribute allo studio della mastite bovina da ‘Pseudomonas aeruginosa’. Archivio Veterinario Italiano 11, 273.Google Scholar
Schalm, O. W., Lasmanis, J. & Carroll, E. J. (1967). Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa mastitis in cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 28, 697.Google Scholar
Tucker, E. W. (1950). Pseudomonas infection of the bovine udder apparently contracted from contaminated equipment and materials. Cornell Veterinarian 40, 95.Google Scholar
Ziv, G. (1971). Mastitis control in the family-type dairy herd in Israel: I. Effects of milking hygiene and antibiotic treatment on new infections. Refuah veterinarith 28, 1.Google Scholar
Ziv, G. & Risenberg-Tirer, R. (1970). The in vitro activity of several antibiotics against Pseudomonas of bovine udder origin. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin B 17, 963.Google Scholar