No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Rapid Gravimetric Method of Standardising Vaccines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2009
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1. A method is described of rapidly evaporating to dryness bacterial emulsions contained in tarred flasks and from the increase of weight determining the strength of the emulsion.
The same apparatus can be used for a variety of purposes, e.g. drying serum, estimating solids in water, milk etc.
2. A very rapid method of drying bacteria smeared on a tarred piece of platinum foil, and from the dried residue preparing a vaccine is described.
3. A correlation between the number and weight of bacteria in vaccines made from agar cultures of the B. typhosus, B. coli, B. pyocyaneus, Meningococcus (Weichselbaum), Pseudo-Gonococcus, Micrococcus melitensis, B. pneumoniae Friedlander, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus has been established.
4. The advantages of the gravimetric method are:
(a) That with a sensitive balance constant results are obtained.
(b) It is more rapid, and involves no strain ou the eyes.
(c) It can be applied to cultures of all bacteria growing on solid media, whether these form uniform emulsions or not, e.g. vaccines of Streptococci, Micrococcus catarrhalis, Diphtheroid organisms, B. tuberculosis, Streptothrices can be accurately standardised. Even small clumps in the vaccine considerably vitiate the results in Wright's method. The chief precaution to take in the gravimetric method is to remove the growth carefully, without breaking the surface of the medium and avoiding the condensation water.
(d) It brings into line the dosage of bacterio-proteins with that of other medical remedies.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912
References
Basseuge-Rimpau, , quoted by Friedberger in “Die Methoden der Schutzimpfung gegen Typhus, Darstellung der Impfstoffe”. Handbuch d. Technik u. Meth. d. Immunitätsforschung by Kraus and Levaditi, 1908, p. 723.Google Scholar
Bassett-Smith, (1908). Prevention and treatment of Mediterranean Fever. Journ. Royal Army Ned. Corps, X, p. 1.Google Scholar
Friedberger, and Moreschi, (1905). Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die aktive Immunisierung von Kaninchen gegen Cholera und Typhus. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. orig. XXXIX, p. 453.Google Scholar
Grattan, and Webb, (1909). Preparation of Anti-typhoid Vaccine. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, XIII, p. 62.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. S. (1905). On a modification of Wright's method for counting the Bacteria contained in a culture. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, IV, p. 313.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. S.(1907). Report on the results of experiments in connection with anti-typhoid Vaccination. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, VIII, p. 472.Google Scholar
Leishman, (1905). The blood changes following Typhoid Inoculations. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, V, p. 1.Google Scholar
Leishman, , Harrison, , Grattan, , and Archibold, (1908). Report on further experiments in connection with anti-typhoid inoculations. Journ. Royal Army Med. Corps, X, p. 583.Google Scholar
Löffler, , quoted by Friedberger in “Die Methoden der Schutzimpfung gegen Typhus ” (p. 723) and by Pick in “ Darstellung der Antigene mit chemischen und physikalischen Methoden ” (p. 331). Handbuch d. Technik u. Meth. d. Immunitätsforschung by Kraus and Levaditi, 1908.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, and Kolle, , quoted by Netter (1906) in “Les inoculations préventives contre la Fièvre typhoide”, Bull. Inst. Pasteur, IV, p. 873 and by Friedberger (p. 723) and Pick (p. 331) in Handbuch d. Technik u. Meth. d. Immunitatsforschung by Kraus and Levaditi, 1908.Google Scholar
Wright, (5. vii. 1902). On some new procedures for the examination of the blood and of bacterial cultures. Lancet, II p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access