Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T18:40:21.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seroprevalence of brucella antibodies among persons in high-risk occupation in Lebanon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. F. Araj  and
R. A. Azzam
G. F. Araj*
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 113-6044, Beirut, Lebanon
R. A. Azzam
Affiliation:
Ministrty of Public Health, Office of Director General, Beirut – Lebanon
*
* Correspondence and requests for reprints.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prevalence of brucella-specific antibodies was measured in 597 persons in high-risk occupations living in 10 regions of Lebanon using the standard agglutination test (SAT), anti-human globulin (Coombs') test (AHGT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measuring immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM and IgA. The study population consisted of butchers (54%) farmers (35%), laboratory technicians (8%), abbatoir workers (2%) and veterinarians (1%), with 82% males and 18% females. The overall seroprevalence based on SAT and AHGT titres of ≥ 80 was 1·7% and 15%, respectively, but seroprevalence varied by region from 0–5% in SAT and from 3·4–34% for AHGT. The overall seroprevalence based on ELISA IgG (OD≥0·6), IgM (OD≥0·6) and IgA (OD≥0·3) was 57, 61 and 26%, respectively. The highest seroprevalence was noted in Biqaa (34%), Kisrwan (24%), Shouf (21%), Sidon (16%) and Aley (12) regions. Nineteen percent of those surveyed reported symptoms that could be associated with brucellosis. We conclude that exposure to brucellosis is high among persons in high-risk occupations from all surveyed regions in Lebanon. Such findings should be used to design control measures especially now that the 17 years of civil strife is over.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 117 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

1.Alausa, OK. Brucellosis: socio-economic problems and control in various countries. Trop Geog Med 1980; 32: 5–11.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Manes, G. Epidemiological situation of brucellosis in the Mediterranean countries. Develop Biol Stand 1983; 56: 739–47.Google Scholar
3.FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis. World Health Organization technical report series no. 740: 6th report Geneva, 1986.Google Scholar
4.Madkour, MM, Gargani, G. Epidemiological aspects. In: Madkour, MM, ed. Brucellosis. London: Butterworths, 1989: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Araj, GF. Brucellosis in the Arabian Peninsula: A continued saga that could end with optimistic rewards. Ann Saudi Med 1993; 13: 571–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Young, EJ. Serologic diagnosis of human brucellosis: Analysis of 214 cases by agglutination tests and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13: 359–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Dajani, YF, Masoud, AA, Barakat, HF. Epidemiology and diagnosis of human brucellosis in Jordan. J Trop Med Hyg 1989; 92: 209–14.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Dhar, R, Araj, GF, Kisswani, SM, Chugh, TD. In vitro activity of conventional and newer antimicrobial agents against Brucella melitensis clinical isolates from Kuwait. Med Principles Pract 1990; 2: 110–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Abramson, O, Rosenvasser, Z, Block, C, Dagan, R. Detection and treatment of brucellosis by screening a population at risk. Paed Infect Dis J 1991; 10: 434–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Al-Ballaa, SR.Al-Balla, SR, Al-Aska, A, Kambal, ASA, Al-Hedaithy, MA. Seasonal variation of culture positive brucellosis at a major teaching hospital. Ann Saudi Med 1994; 14: 12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Wise, RI. Brucellosis in the United States, past present and future. JAMA 1980; 244: 2318–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Lulu, AR, Araj, GF, Khateeb, MI, Mustafa, MY, Yusuf, AR, Fenech, FF. Human brucellosis in Kuwait: A prospective study of 400 cases. Q J Med 1988; 66: 39–54.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Araj, GF, Lulu, AR, Khateeb, MI, Saadah, MA, Shakir, RA. ELISA versus routine tests in the diagnosis of patients with systemic and neurobrucellosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1988; 96: 171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Arrighi, HM. Brucellosis surveillance in Saudi Arabia's eastern province. Ann Saudi Med 1986; 6 (Suppl): 5–10.Google Scholar
15.Buchanan, TM, Faber, LC, Feldman, RA. Brucellosis in the United States 1960–1972: an abattoir-associated disease. Part II. Diagnostic aspects. Medicine 1974; 53: 415–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Williams, E. Brucellosis in veterinary surgeons in Wales. JR Coll Physicians Lond 1976; 10: 351–62.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Stephen, LE. Brucellosis: A public health problem in Lebanon. Leb Med J 1957; 10: 259–74.Google ScholarPubMed
MAAR. Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources report: Investigation sur la brucellose des ruminants au Liban et recommendation plans (Unpublished internal study), 1982.Google Scholar
18.Seoud, M, Saade, G, Awar, G, Uwaydah, M. Brucellosis in pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1991; 369: 441–5.Google Scholar
19.Alton, GG, Jones, LM, Pietz, DE. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis, 2nd ed. World Health Organization Monograph Series no. 545, Geneva, 1975.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Araj, GF, Lulu, AR, Mustafa, MY, Khateeb, MI. Evaluation of ELISA in the diagnosis of acute and chronic brucellosis in human beings. J Hyg 1986; 97:457–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Al-Nasser, A, Al-Aska, A, Al Balla, S, Al-Mofleh, IA, Al-Sukait, M, Hassan, OS. Epidemiology of brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 1991; 11: 245.Google Scholar
22.Cooper, CW. Prevalence of antibody to brucella in asymptomatic well individuals in Saudi Arabia. J Trop Med Hyg 1992; 95: 140–2.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Poole, PM. A 6-year survey of human brucellosis in a rural area of north-western England and north Wales. Postgrad Med J 1975; 51: 433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Radwan, AI, Asmar, JA, Friechs, WM, Bekairi, SI, Al-Mukayel, AA. Incidence of brucellosis in domestic livestock in Saudi Arabia. Trop Animal Health Prod 1983; 15: 139–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Hellmann, E, Staak, C, Baumann, M. Bovine brucellosis among two different cattle populations in Bhar Ghazal province of Southern Sudan. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, 1984; 35: 123–6.Google Scholar
26.El-Sanousi, SM, Omer, EE. Serological survey of brucellosis in Benghazi cow project (Libya). Int J Zoon 1985; 12: 207–10.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Hosie, BD, A-Bakri, OM, Futter, RJ. Survey of brucellosis in goats and sheep in the Yemen Arab Republic: comparison of tests for Brucella melitensis infection in sheep. Trop Animal Health Prod 1985; 17: 93–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Yagoub, IA, Mohamed, AA, Salim, MO. Serological survey of Brucella abortus antibody prevalence in the one-humped camel (Camelus dormedarius) from eastern Sudan. Revue d'Elevage et de Medicine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux 1990; 43: 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Abo-Shehada, MN, Rabi, AZ, Abuharfeil, N. The prevalence of brucellosis among veterinarians in Jordan. Ann Saudi Med 1991; 11: 356–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Al-Zeftawi, NM, Al-Issa, M, Bekairi, SI, Radwan, AI, Hafez, SM. Epidemiology of brucellosis among abattoir workers in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 1986; 6 (suppl): 26–31.Google Scholar
31.Moyer, NP, Evins, GM, Pigott, NE, Hudson, JD, Farshy, CE, Feeley, JC, Hausler, W Jr. Comparison of serologic screening tests for brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1969–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Gilbert, GL, Hawes, LA. The antibody response to brucella: Immnunoglobulin response measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and conventional tests. Aust NZ J Med 1981; 11: 40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Pellicer, T, Ariza, J, Foz, A, Pallares, R, Gudial, F. Specific antibodies detected during relapse of human brucellosis. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 918–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Araj, GF. Profiles of brucella-specific immunoglobulin G subclasses in sera of patients with acute and chronic brucellosis. Serodiag immunother Infect Dis 1988; 2: 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Araj, GF, Dhar, R, Lastimoza, JL, Haj, M. Indirect fluorescent antibody test vs ELISA and agglutination tests in the serodiagnosis of patients with brucellosis. Serodiag Immunother Infect Dis 1990; 4: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Bettelheim, KA, Maskill, WJ, Pearce, J. Comparison of standard tube and microagglutination techniques for determining brucella antibodies. J Hyg 1983; 90: 33–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Araj, GF, Kaufmann, AF. Determination by ELISA of IgG, IgM and IgA to Brucella melitensis major outer membrane proteins and whole-cell heat-killed antigens in sera of patients with brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 1909–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Kiehl, FW, Khan, Y. Analysis of 506 consecutive positive serologic tests for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1384–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Heizmann, W, Botzenhart, K, Doller, G, Schanz, D, Hermann, G, Fleischmann, K. Brucellosis: Serological methods compared. J Hyg 1985; 95: 639–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Granfors, K, Viljanen, MK, Toivanen, A. Measurement of immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin A antibodies against Yersinia enterocalitica by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: Comparison of lipopolysaccharide and whole bacterium as antigen. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 6–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Goldbaum, FA, Rubbi, CP, Wallach, JC, Miguel, SE, Baldi, PC, Fossati, CA. Differentiation between active and inactive human brucellosis by measuring antiprotein humoral immune responses. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 604–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Venkatakrishna-Bhatt, H, Parikh, JR, Nigam, SK. Veterinarians and their distribution as a means to locate human brucellosis. Asian Med J 1985; 28: 641–50.Google Scholar