Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:27:34.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A simple method for the determination of bacterial sensitivity to sulphonamides by the use of blotting-paper disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. J. Evans
Affiliation:
From the Pathology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, E.C. 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A description is given of a simple method of determining the sensitivity of bacteria to sulphonamides by means of impregnated blotting-paper disks applied to nutrient agar prepared from broth freed from sulphonamide antagonists by incubation with lysed horse red blood cells.

With organisms sensitive to the selected sulphonamide, a zone of inhibition of growth will occur, the diameter of which is related to the concentration of the sulphonamide necessary to inhibit growth. Sensitivity to several sulphonamides can be determined simultaneously.

The impregnated disks can be stored without loss of potency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

References

REFERENCES

Epstein, J. A., Foley, E. J., Perrine, Isabel & Lee, S. W. (1944). J. Lab. clin. Med. 29, 319.Google Scholar
Frisk, A. R. (1943). Acta med. scand. (Suppl.), 142, 34.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. (1945). J. Path. Bact. 52, 457.Google Scholar
Harper, G. J. & Cawston, W. C. (1945). J. Path. Bact. 57, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatley, N. G. (1944). Biochem. J. 38, 61.Google Scholar
Kokko, U. P. (1947). Annales Medicinae Experimentalis et Biologiae Fenniae, 25, Fasc. 1, 79.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. M. (1940). J. exp. Med. 72, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, D. C. (1945). J. Path. Bact. 57, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. G. & Vincent, H. W. (1944). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 55, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar