Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T12:25:42.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the loss of viability of stored bacterial aerosols*. II. Death rates of several non-pathogenic organisms in relation to biological and structural characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Ronald M. Ferry ,
William F. Brown  and
Edwin B. Damon
Ronald M. Ferry
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
William F. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Edwin B. Damon
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For several decades bacteriologists and epidemiologists have been interested in the survival of micro-organisms in the airborne state. Studies by many investigators, recently summarized by Wells (1955), have produced data concerning certain aspects of bacterial survival or death, but the information has not generally sufficed to permit quantitative analysis when a fluid environment was changed in the airborne state.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 1958 , pp. 125 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

References

REFERENCES

Archer, R. J. & La Mer, V. K. (1955). The evaporation of water through fatty acid mono-layers. J. Phys. Chem. 59, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselineau, J. (1951). Acides Mycoliques et Cires de Baeille Tuberculeux, 187 pp. Paris: Aruette, France.Google Scholar
Dunklin, E. W. & Puck, T. T. (1948). The lethal effect of relative humidity in airborne bacteria. J. exp. Med. 87, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, R. M., Farr, L. E. Jr, Rose, J. & Blau, M. (1951). A study of freshly generated aerosols. J. infect. Dis. 88, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, R. M. & Maple, T. G. (1954). Studies of the loss of viability of bacterial aerosols. I. M. Candidus. J. infect Dis. 95, 1942.Google ScholarPubMed
Fry, R. M. & Greaves, R. I. H. (1951). The survival of bacterial during and after drying. J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 220.Google Scholar
Griffin, C. W., Kantzes, H. L., Ludford, P. M. & Pelozar, M. J. Jr. (1956). Studies of aerosols with a simple cloud chamber technic. I. Appl. Microbiol. 4, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gucker, F. T., O'Konski, C. T., Pickard, H. B. & Pitts, J. N. Jr. (1947). A photoelectric instrument for comparing the concentrations of very dilute aerosols and measuring low light intensities. J. Atner. Chem. Soc. 69, 2422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, C., Dubos, R. J. & Middlebrook, G. (1947). Infection of mice with mammalian tubercle baeille from a tween-albumin liquid medium. J. exp. Med. 86, 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, W. F. (1955). Airborne Contagion and Air Hygiene, 421 pp., 85 figures, and 38 tables. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar