Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T11:23:30.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the 1967–8 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic: The relation of weather to the spread of disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. E. Hugh-Jones  and
P. B. Wright
M. E. Hugh-Jones
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, M.A.F.F., New Haw, Surrey
P. B. Wright
Affiliation:
Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berks.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An analysis of the 1967–8 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic with reference to the initial spread, the origin of outbreaks more than 60 km. from the main epidemic area, the series of outbreaks near Worcester, a specific case history and the daily rate of spread of the epidemic, strongly suggests that the weather played a major part in the spread of disease. The two main factors involved in this type of spread are wind and precipitation. It is noted that after the epidemic had been checked, following anticyclonic weather, the association between the weather and the spread of disease was less apparent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 253 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Burrows, R. (1968). Excretion of foot and mouth disease virus prior to the development of lesions. Veterinary Record 82, 385–7.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. C. (1955). Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Report No. HP/R 1261.Google Scholar
Fogedby, E. G., Malmquist, W. A., Osteen, O. L. & Johnson, M. L. (1960). Air-borne transmission of foot and mouth disease virus. Nordisk Veterinaermedicin 12, 490–8.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Milne, P. S. (1938). Aerial drift of insects. Nature, London 141, 602–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R. J. (1969). The outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Worcestershire. An epidemiological study: with special reference to spread of the disease by wind-carriage of the virus. Journal of Hygiene 67, 21–33.Google Scholar
Hurst, G. W. (1968). Foot and mouth disease, the possibility of continental sources of the virus in England in epidemics of October 1967 and several other years. Veterinary Record 81, 610–7.Google Scholar
Hyslop, N. St G. (1965 a). Secretion of foot and mouth disease virus and antibody in the saliva of infected and immunised cattle. Journal of Comparative Pathology 75, 111–17.Google Scholar
Hyslop, N. St G. (1965 b). Airborne infection with the virus of foot and mouth disease. Journal of Comparative Pathology 75, 119–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindyyakov, V. I. (1940). Investigation on the viability of foot and mouth disease virus outside the body. Sovyèt Vet. No. 10, 20–22 (Veterinary Bulletin, Weybridge 12, 532).Google Scholar
McLean, R. C. (1938). Carriers of foot and mouth disease. Nature, London 141, 828.Google Scholar
Mead, C. J. (1968). Birds as vectors of the foot and mouth virus. Veterinary Annual 9, 70–75.Google Scholar
Pasquill, F. (1961). The estimation of the deposition of wind-borne material. Meteorological Magazine, London 90, 33–49.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. & Hugh-Jones, M. E. (1969). The weather factor in foot and mouth disease epidemics. Nature, London 223, 712–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, P. B. (1969). Effects of wind and precipitation on the spread of foot-and-mouth disease. Weather, London 24, 204–13.Google Scholar