Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T03:17:00.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the isolation of Salmonella dublin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. W. S. Harvey  and
T. H. Price
R. W. S. Harvey
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff
T. H. Price
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory Service, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Abattoir drain swabs, bovine faeces and a few other veterinary samples were examined for the presence of Salmonella dublin. Three selective agar media and four enrichment broths were investigated. The two most efficient plating media were deoxycholate citrate agar and brilliant green MacConkey agar. Wilson and Blair's bismuth sulphite agar (de Loureiro's modification) was least successful. Selenite F broth, whether incubated at 37 or 43° C., was better than the other enrichment broths used which contained a triphenyl methane dye as one of the selective ingredients.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 369 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Gibson, E. A. (1965). Reviews of the progress of dairy science. Section E. Diseases of dairy cattle. Salmonella infection in cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 32, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. (1956). Choice of a selective medium for the routine isolation of members of the salmonella group. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 15, 118.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. (1973). Salmonella contaminated animal feed in relation to infection in animals and man. In The Microbiological Safety of Food (ed. Hobbs, Betty C. and Christian, J. H. B.), p. 9. London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967). The examination of samples infected with multiple salmonella serotypes. Journal of Hygiene 65, 423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1974). Isolation of Salmonellas. Public Health Laboratory Service Monograph Series, no. 8. London: H.M.S.O. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, M. E. (1970). Salmonellosis and V.I.D.A., 1969, Veterinary Record 87, 275.Google Scholar
Magee, M. F. & Hinton, M. (1974). The growth of Salmonella dublin and Salmonella typhimurium on MacConkey media containing brilliant green. Medical Laboratory Technology 31, 175.Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. (1948). The detection of paratyphoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 7, 241.Google Scholar
Loureiro, J. A. De (1942). A modification of Wilson and Blair's bismuth sulphite agar (stabilized stock solutions). Journal of Hygiene 42, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. B. (1930). Notes on organisms serologically related to S. enteritidis Gärtner. I. The Dublin and Tokyo types of salmonella. Journal of Hygiene 29, 443.Google Scholar