Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T16:30:55.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal comfort during surgical operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. P. Wyon ,
O. M. Lidwell  and
R. E. O. Williams
D. P. Wyon
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London, N.W. 9 and Wright-Fleming Institute, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Paddington, London, W. 2
O. M. Lidwell
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London, N.W. 9 and Wright-Fleming Institute, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Paddington, London, W. 2
R. E. O. Williams
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London, N.W. 9 and Wright-Fleming Institute, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Paddington, London, W. 2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Visits have been made to thirty operating suites in the British Isles. Each suite was visited three times at approximately 4-month intervals and observations made on an average of five half-day working sessions on each occasion. Measurements were made of air temperature, humidity, air movement and radiation temperature and many details of the suites and working conditions recorded. At suitable intervals the operating room staff were questioned as to their feelings of thermal comfort using Bedford's 7-point scale. Over 2500 sets of replies were obtained. Visible sweating was also noted.

The effect on comfort and the extent of visible sweating of the many items recorded was then explored by means of a sequential multiple regression analysis. Although air temperature was by far the most important factor affecting thermal comfort, all the variables named above exerted a significant effect. In addition, a number of other conditions including age, sex and race produced minor differences.

Surgeons and anaesthetists were found to differ from other staff in their thermal preferences, the surgeons liking a cooler and the anaesthetists a warmer environment. Although most surgeons were comfortable at temperatures around 66·5°F. (19°C.), at 50% relative humidity and 25 ft./min. air movement with the average amount of thermal radiation from the operating room lamp, it would be necessary to keep the temperature down to 64·5°F. (18°C.) if no more than one surgeon in twenty was to be uncomfortably hot. At this temperature nearly half the anaesthetists, who mostly preferred temperatures around 71°F. (21·5°C.), would feel too cold. Variation in the clothing worn by different staff members seems to be the only way of resolving this difficulty.

The average temperature in the operating rooms visited was over 72°F. (22°C.), and 75°F. (24°C.) was exceeded on about 25% of occasions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 229 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Angus, T. C. (1959). Air conditions in operating theatres. Med. Press 242, 113.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. (1936). The warmth factor in comfort at work. Rep. Industr. Hlth Res. Bd., London, no. 76.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. (1964). Basic Principles of Ventilation and Heating, 2nd ed.London: H. K. Lewis and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. R., Speers, R., O'Grady, F. & Shooter, R. A. (1965). Reduction of dissemination of skin bacteria by modification of operating-room clothing and by ultra-violet irradiation. Lancet ii, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethune, D. W., Blowers, R., Parker, M. & Pask, E. A. (1965). Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus by patients and surgical staff. Lancet i, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biomedical Series (1965). Health Sciences Computing Facility, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Black, F. A. & Milroy, E. A. (1966). Building Research, Design Series, no. 51. Building Research Station, Garston, Watford, England.Google Scholar
Blowers, R. & McCluskey, M. (1965). Design of operating-room dress for surgeons. Lancet ii, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnley, J. (1965). Operating room conditions. Lancet ii, 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. E., McMillan, A. D. & Webb, C. G. (1965). Order in thermal comfort data. Building Research Station Note no. EN91/65 (unpublished). Garston, Watford, England.Google Scholar
Hickish, D. E. (1955). Thermal sensation of workers in light industry in summer. J. Hyg., Camb. 53, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghten, F. C. & Cook, W. L. (1939). Cooling requirements of operating room and recovery ward. Trans. Am. Soc. Heat. Vent. Engrs. 45, 161.Google Scholar
Koch, W., Jennings, B. H. & Humphreys, C. M. (1960). Is humidity important in the temperature comfort range? ASHRAE Jl 2, (4), 63.Google Scholar
Kuno, Y. (1956). Human Perspiration, pp. 103–7. Thomas, Springfield Ill. U.S.A.Google Scholar
Lee, D. H. K. (1958). Proprioclimate of man and domestic animals. Arid Zone Res. 10, 102.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. (1961). Multiple regression analysis applied to records of post-operative hospital sepsis. J. Hyg. Camb. 59, 259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidwell, O. M. & Wyon, D. P. (1968). A rapid response radiometer for the estimation of mean radiant temperature in environmental studies. J. scient. Instrum. (In the press.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, C. G. (1959). An analysis of some observations of thermal comfort in an equatorial climate. Br. J. Ind. Med. 16, 297.Google Scholar