Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T04:29:24.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tuberculin testing in hospital personnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Marguerite P. Holley  and
C. A. Bartzokas
Marguerite P. Holley
Affiliation:
David Lewis Northern Hospital, Leeds Street, Liverpool, L3 6AU
C. A. Bartzokas
Affiliation:
David Lewis Northern Hospital, Leeds Street, Liverpool, L3 6AU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tuberculin testing of 176 personnel in a Liverpool hospital showed a total incidence of 68 % negative reactors. This remarkably high percentage was similar for each of the various groups of workers tested. We did not find the Tine test to be a satisfactory method of screening for tuberculin sensitivity because 30% were doubtful reactors. In these, further tuberculin testing by the Mantoux reagent was always positive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 325 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, A. B., & White, J. E. W. (1965). An evaluation of a disposable tuberculin test in children. Tubercle, London 46, 126.Google Scholar
Atuk, N. O. & Hunt, E. H. (1971). Serial tuberculin testing and isoniazid therapy in general Hospital employees. Journal of the American Medical Association 218, 1795.Google Scholar
Ehrenkranz, N. J. & Kicklighter, J. L. (1972). Tuberculosis outbreak in a general hospital: evidence for airborne spread of infection. Annals of Internal Medicine 77, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, P. A. & Shaw, E. M. (1964). A comparison of the Heaf and the Tine disposable multiple puncture tuberculin tests. Tubercle, London 45, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, M. H., Furcolow, M. L., Chick, E. W., Bauman, D. S., Arik, M. (1972). Tuberculin skin test reactions. Effects of revised classification on comparative evaluations. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 106, 752.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. (1975). Tuberculin sensitivity in South London infant school children. Public Health, London 90, 5.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. H. & Kingsley, B. J. (1965). A comparison of the Heaf and Tine tuberculin tests. Tubercle, London 46, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Association (1969). Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis, p. 62. New York.Google Scholar
Noble, J. & Behnke, R. H. J. (1965). A comparison of the P.P.D. with the tuberculin Tine Test. Journal of the Indiana Medical Association 58, 423.Google Scholar
Rochester, W. R. & Shee, J. C. (1966). The Tine Test compared with standard Heaf Test in Africans. Medical Proceedings 12, 521.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. R. (1966). The Tuberculin Tine Test. General Practice 34, 116.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. R., McEnery, J. T., Nika, B., Thorne, M. G. (1969). A modified tuberculin Tine Test. New Products 1, 50.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. R., Nikurs, L., Yordy, E. & Williams, W. J. (1967). Tuberculin Tine Test in infection and disease. Southern Medical Association Journal 60, 1336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shee, J. C. & Rochester, W. R. (1966). The Tine Test compared with standard Mantoux Test in Africans. Medical Proceedings 12, 137.Google Scholar
Young, N. (1967). Tuberculin skin testing with special reference to the Tine Test. Delaware Medical Journal 39, 235.Google Scholar