Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:28:01.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variations in the clinical pattern of experimentally induced colds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A.T. Roden
A.T. Roden
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An analysis has been made of the records of 5290 attendances at the Common Cold Research Unit, Salisbury, during the years 1946 to 1957. Materials prepared from the nasal washings of persons suffering from colds were administered to 993 volunteers, of whom 386 (38·9 %) showed definite evidence of infection within a few days. The attack rate of these experimentally induced colds was lower during the months October to March than from April to September. The difference was statistically significant as regards male but not as regards female volunteers.

Six strains of virus were propagated by passage from volunteer to volunteer, in one instance up to the eighth serial transfer from the original material, without apparent loss of pathogenic properties. Comparison of the clinical effects of these strains, and of a number of miscellaneous strains, revealed several differences which were minor in character but, statistically, highly significant. These comprised differences in attack rate, severity, incubation period, duration and relative frequency of symptoms, which could not be ascribed to seasonal or other influences.

It was concluded that the observed variations in the clinical pattern of the experimentally induced colds were attributable to qualitative differences in the strains of virus used.

I wish to thank Sir Christopher Andrewes, F.R.S., for his unfailing help and encouragement at every stage of this investigation and all my colleagues at the Common Cold Research Unit for much useful comment and discussion. I am indebted to the Statistics Department of the Ministry of Labour and National Service for processing the records and to Mr R. G. Carpenter for assistance with some of the statistical analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1963 , pp. 231 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

Andrewes, C.H. (1949). The natural history of the common cold. Lancet, i, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewes, C. H. (1950). Adventures among viruses. III. The puzzle of the common cold.. New Engl.J.Med., 242, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewes, C.H., Chaproniere, D.M., Gompels, A.E.H., Pereira, H.G. & Roden, A.T.(1953). Propagation of common-cold virus in tissue cultures. Lancet, ii, 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common Cold Research Unit (1947). Interim report on a transmission experiment. Brit.med.J., i, 650.Google Scholar
Dowling, H.F., Jackson, G.G., Spiesman, I.G. & Inouye, T. (1958). Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. III.The effect of chilling of the subjects upon susceptibility. Amer.J.Hyg., 68, 59.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, G.G. & Dowling, H.F. (1959). Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. IV.Specific immunity to the common cold.. J.Clin.Invest. 38, 762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, G.G., Dowling, H.F. & Anderson, T.O. (1958). Neutralization of common cold agents in volunteers by pooled human globulin. Science, 128, 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, G.G., Dowling, H.F., Spiesman, I.G. & Boand, A.V. (1958). Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. I. The common cold as a clinical entity. Arch.intern.Med., 101, 267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, H.O. (1951). Complex contingency tables treated by the partition of x 2. J.R.statist.Soc.B, 13, 242.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O.M. & Williams, R.E.O. (1961). The epidemiology of the common cold.II. Cross-infection and immunity.. J.Hyg., Camb. 59, 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovelock, J.E., Porterfield, J.S., Roden, A.T, Sommerville, T.,& Andrewes, C.H. (1952). Further studies on the natural transmission of the common cold. Lancet, ii, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D.D., Williams, R.E.O. & Hirch, A. (1953). Colds among office workers. An epidemiological study.. Lancet, ii, 1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roden, A.T. (1958). Clinical assessment of the common cold. Proc.R.Soc.Med., 51, 271.Google ScholarPubMed
Tyrrell, D.A.J. & Bynoe, M.L. (1961). Some further virus isolations from common colds. Brit. med. J. i, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, D.A.J., Bynoe, M.L., Buckland, F.E. & Hayflick, L. (1962). The cultivation in human-embryo cells of a virus (D.C.) causing colds in man. Lancet, ii, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, D.A.J., Bynoe, M.L., Hitchcock, G., Pereira, H.G., Andrewes, C.H. & Parsons, R. (1960). Some virus isolations from common colds. Lancet, i, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar